International Comparative Planning Methodology: Introduction to the Theme Issue

Planning Practice and Research

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-5

  Nadin, Vincent ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859592771     PISSN: 02697459     EISSN: 13600583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2012.669928     Document Type: Editorial

References (20)

1. Alterman, R. 2010. Takings International: A Comparative Perspective on Land Use Regulations and Compensation Rights, Chicago: American Bar Association.
2. Böhme, K. and Waterhout, B. 2008. "The Europeanisation of planning". In European Spatial Research and Planning, Edited by: Faludi, A. 225-248. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
3. Booth, P. 2011. Culture, planning and path dependence: Some reflections on the problems of comparison. Town Planning Review, 82(1): 13-28.
4. Buitelaar, E. and Sorel, N. 2010. Between the rule of law and the quest for control: Legal certainty in the Dutch planning system. Land Use Policy, 27(3): 983-989.
5. CEC - Commission of the European Communities. 1997. The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies. Regional Development Studies, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
6. De Vries, J. and Van den Broeck, J. 1997. Belelux: A microcosm of planning cultures. Built Environment, 23(1): 58-69.
7. Dühr, S., Colomb, C. and Nadin, V. 2010. European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation, London: Routledge.
8. Dühr, S. and Nadin, V. 2007. Europeanization through transnational territorial cooperation? The case of INTERREG IIIB North-west Europe. Planning Practice and Research, 22(3): 373-394.
9. Faludi, A. 2005. "The Netherlands: A culture with a soft spot for planning". In Comparative Planning Cultures, Edited by: Sanyal, B. 285-307. London: Routledge.
10. Farinós Dasí, J. 2006. "ESPON Project 2.3.2: Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level". Esch-sur-Alzette: ESPON Coordination Unit. Final Report
11. Fürst, D. 2009. "Planning cultures en route to a better comprehension of 'planning processes'?". In Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, Edited by: Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 23-38. Aldershot: Ashgate.
12. Hantrais, L. 2009. International Comparative Research: Theory, Methods and Practice, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Howard, E. 1898. Tomorrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform, London: Swan Sonnenschein.
14. Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 2009. Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, Aldershot: Ashgate.
15. Kunzmann, K. R. Unconditional surrender: The gradual demise of European diversity in planning. keynote paper presented to the 18th AESOP Congress. July, Grenoble. Available at http://www.planum.net/topics/documents/kunzmann_epp_01.pdf (accessed 1 July 2009)
16. Masser, I. 1986. "Some methodological considerations". In Learning from Other Countries, Edited by: Masser, I. and Williams, R. H. 15-25. Norwich: Geo Books.
17. Nadin, V. and Stead, D. 2008. European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. Disp, 172: 35-47.
18. Stead, D. and Cotella, G. 2011. Differential Europe: Domestic actors and their role in shaping spatial planning systems. Disp, 186: 13-21.
19. Ward, S. 2002. Planning the Twentieth-century City: The Advanced Capitalist World, Chichester: John Wiley.
20. Zweigert, K. and Kötz, H. 1998. An Introduction to Comparative Law, 3rd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press.