The shadowy side of innovation: Unmaking and sustainability

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 363-375

  Shove, Elizabeth ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cycling; disappearance; innovation; reinvention; revival; sociotechnical systems

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; INNOVATION; PLANNING THEORY; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84859583720     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2012.663961     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aldred, R. 2010. 'On the outside': Constructing cycling citizenship. Social and Cultural Geography, 11: 35-52.
2. Abernathy, W. and Clark, K. 1985. Innovation-mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14: 3-22.
3. Blickstein, S. and Hanson, S. 2001. Critical mass: Forging a politics of sustainable mobility in the information age. Transportation, 28: 347-362.
4. Berkers, E. and Geels, F. W. 2011. System innovation through stepwise reconfiguration: The case of technological transitions in Dutch greenhouse horticulture (1930-1980). Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 23: 227-248.
5. Berkhout, F., Smith, A. and Stirling, A. 2004. "Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts". In System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy, Edited by: Elzen, B., Geels, F. W. and Green, K. 48-75. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
6. Bijker, W. 1997. Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Borg, K. L. 2007. Auto mechanics: Technology and expertise in twentieth-century America, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. Cabinet Office Strategy Unit. 2009. "Urban transport analysis". http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/308292/urbantransportanalysis.pdf
9. City of Berlin. 2003. Urban transport in Berlin: Focus on bicycling, Berlin: Senatsverwaltung fuer Stadtentwicklung.
10. Cyclists Touring Club. n.d. Cycling statistics.http://www.ctc.org.uk/resources/Campaigns/Cycling_Statistics.pdf
11. De la Bruheze, A. 2000. "Bicycle use in twentieth century Western Europe: The comparison of nine cities". http://www.velomondial.net/velomondiall2000/PDF/BRUHEZE.PDF
12. De la Bruheze, A. and Veraart, F. C.A. 1999. "Fietsverkeer in praktijk en beleid in de twintigste eeuw. Overeenkomsten en verschillen in fietsgebruik (Cycling in practice and policy in the twentieth century". Agreements and differences in bicycle use) in Amsterdam, Eindhoven, Enschede, Zuidoost-Limburg, Antwerpen, Manchester, Copenhagen en Basel. Den Haag: Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Rijkswaterstaat-serie, no. 63
13. Dutch Bicycling Council. 2006. Continuous and integral: The cycling policies of Groningen and other European cities, Amsterdam: Fietsberaad.
14. Elzen, B., Geels, F. W. and Green, K. 2004. System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
15. Geels, F. W. 2005. The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860-1930). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(4): 445-476.
16. Geels, F. W. 2002. Understanding the dynamics of technological transitions: A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis, Enschede: Twente University Press.
17. Geels, F. W. 2004. "Understanding system innovations: A critical literature review and a conceptual synthesis". In System innovation and the transition to sustainability, Edited by: Elzen, B., Geels, F. W. and Green, K. 19-47. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
18. Geels, F. W. and Schot, J. 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36: 399-417.
19. Geels, F. W. and Schot, J. 2010. "Part 1: The dynamics of socio-technical transitions: A sociotechnical perspective". In Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change, Edited by: Grin, J., Rotmans, J. and Schot, J. 11-104. London: Routledge.
20. Hommells, A. 2005. Studying obduracy in the city: Toward a productive fusion between technology studies and urban studies. Science Technology Human Values, 30: 323-351.
21. Horton, D. 2006. Environmentalism and the bicycle. Environmental Politics, 15: 41-58.
22. Lumsdon, L. and Tolley, R. 2001. The national cycle strategy in the UK: To what extent have local authorities adopted its model strategy approach?. Journal of Transport Geography, 9: 293-301.
23. Pantzar, M. 2003. Tools or toys: Inventing the need for domestic appliances in postwar and postmodern Finland. Journal of Advertising, 32: 83-93.
24. Pooley, C. and Turnbull, J. 2000. Modal choice and modal change: The journey to work in Britain since 1890. Journal of Transport Geography, 8: 11-24.
25. Pucher, J. and Buehler, R. 2008. Making cycling irresistible: Lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews, 28: 495-528.
26. Shove, E. and Pantzar, M. 2006. Fossilisation. Ethnologia Europaea: Journal of European Ethnology, 35: 59-63.
27. Sustrans. 2008. "Why cycle?". http://www.sustrans.org.uk/assets/files/leaflets/sustrans_whycycle_March08.pdf
28. The Times. 2008. Ian Hibell, cyclist who pedalled world, killed by hit-and-run driver. The Times online.http://www.lonelyplanet.com/thorntree/thread.jspa?threadID=1661499
29. Urry, J. 2004. The system of automobility. Theory, Culture and Society, 21(4-5): 25-39.
30. Urry, J. 2008. Governance, flows, and the end of the car system?. Global Environmental Change, 18: 343-349.
31. Voß, J.-P., Bauknecht, D. and Kemp, R. 2006. Reflexive governance for sustainable development, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.