Performance of a dry detention pond: Case study of Kota Damansara, Selangor, Malaysia

Urban Water Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 129-136

  Liew, Y S ^a   Selamat, Z ^a   Ghani, A Ab ^b   Zakaria, N A ^b  

^a National Hydraulic Research Institute of Malaysia (NAHRIM)   (Malaysia)

^b RIVER ENGINEERING AND URBAN DRAINAGE RESEARCH CENTRE REDAC   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

dry detention pond; InfoWorks CS, Best Management Practices (BMPs); Urban Stormwater Management Manual for Malaysia (MSMA)

Indexed keywords

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; HYDRAULICS; HYDROLOGY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POND; STORMWATER; URBAN PLANNING; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

MALAYSIA; SELANGOR; WEST MALAYSIA;

EID: 84859570485     PISSN: 1573062X     EISSN: 17449006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1573062X.2011.644567     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ahmad Nasir, B. 2008. Peak flow attenuation using dry pond for existing housing schemes, Universiti Sains Malaysia. Thesis (Master)
2. Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R. and Mays, L.W. 1988. Applied hydrology, Singapore: McGraw-Hill. 2-3, 108, 147-151, 213-214 and 385-388
3. Department of Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia (DID). 2000. Urban Stormwater Management Manual for Malaysia or MSMA. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Pencetakan National Malaysia Berhad (PNMB).
4. Ganendra, Ahmad and Associates. 1996. Computation of total runoff for the proposed sungai rumput and sungai tambul channel and flood routing for proposed flood detention ponds Consultant Report. Selangor, Malaysia: Ganendra, Ahmad and Associates
5. Hassan, J. 2005. River and floodplain modelling for the development of flood risk map: a case study of Sungai Selangor, Universiti Sains Malaysia. Thesis (Master)
6. Kannan, N. 2006. Hydrological modeling of a small catchment using SWAT-2000 - Ensuring correct flow partitioning for contaminant modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 334(1-2): 64-72.
7. Koehn, L., Brye, K.R. and Scarlat, C. 2011. Quantification of stormwater runoff using a combined GIS and curve number approach: a case study for an urban watershed in the Ozark Highlands, USA. Urban Water Journal, 8(4): 255-265.
8. Krishnappan, B.G. and Marselek, J. 2002. Modelling of flocculation and transport of cohesive sediment from an on-stream stormwater detention pond. Water Research, 36(15): 3849-3859.
9. Larm, T. 2000. Stormwater quantity and quality in a multiple pond-wetland system: Flemingsbergsviken case study. Ecological Engineering, 15(1-2): 57-75.
10. Leow, C.S. 2008. Modelling urban river catchment: a case study in Malaysia. Water Management, 162(1): 25-34.
11. Liew, Y.S. 2009. Performance of urban stormwater drainage system through dry detention pond (case study: Kota Damansara, Selangor), Universiti Sains Malaysia. Thesis (Master)
12. Liu, X.B. 2007. A coupled model of hydrodynamics and water quality for Yuqiao reservoir in Haihe river basin. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 20(5): 574-582.
13. Mann, P.S. 2005. Introductory statistics: using technology, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
14. Methods, H. 2003. Floodplain modeling using HEC-RAS, Waterbury, US: Haestad Press.
15. Mishra, P. and Babu, R.R. 2008. Hydrological modelling of Gayapaharinala watershed in Chotanagpur Plateau. Journal of Water Management, 16(1): 47-54.
16. Northern Virginia Planning District Commission and Engineers and Surveyors Institute. 1992. Northern Virginia BMP handbook: a guide to planning and designing best management practices in Northern Virginia
17. Semadeni-Davies, A. 2008. The impacts of climate change and urbanisation on drainage in Helsingborg, Sweden: suburban stormwater. Journal of Hydrology, 350(1-2): 114-125.
18. Somes, N.L.G., Fabian, J. and Wong, T.H.F. 2000. Tracking pollutant detention in constructed stormwater wetlands. Urban Water, 2(1): 29-37.
19. Sperling, M.V. 2010. Comparison between polishing (maturation) ponds and subsurface flow constructed wetlands (planted and unplanted) for the post-treatment of the effluent from UASB reactors. Water Science & Technology, 61(5): 1201-1209.
20. Tsheko, R. 2006. Comparison between the United States Soil Conservation Service (SCS) and the two models commonly used for estimating rainfall-runoff in south-eastern Botswana. Water Research Commission, South Africa, 32: 26-36.
21. Walker, D.J. 1998. Modelling residence time in stormwater ponds. Ecological Engineering, 10(3): 247-262.
22. Wallingford Software. 2008. InfoWorks CS (collection systems)-technical review, Wallingford, UK: Wallingford Software Ltd.
23. Xu, Z.Y., Godrej, A.N. and Grizzard, T.J. 2007. The hydrological calibration and validation of a complexly-linked watershed-reservoir model for the Occoquan Watershed, Virginia. Journal of Hydrology, 347(3-4): 167-183.
24. Yi, Q.T. 2010. Characteristics of nutrient retention in a stormwater wetland during dry and wet days. Water Science & Technology, 61(6): 1535-1545.
25. Yip, H.W. 2002. Flood runoff estimation of ungauged river catchments using soil conservation service method, Universiti Sains Malaysia. Thesis (Master)