The effects of narrow-bandwidth multipoint videoconferencing on group decision making and turn distribution

Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration, WACC 1999

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 109-116

  Takao, Shinji ^a,b  

^a NTT Advance Technology Corporation   (Japan)

^b KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Decision making; Group; Turn taking; Videoconferencing

Indexed keywords

NASA; STUDENTS; VIDEO CONFERENCING;

FACE-TO-FACE MEETINGS; GROUP; GROUP DECISION MAKING; MULTIPLE COMPARISON TEST; MULTIPOINT VIDEOCONFERENCING; NARROW BANDWIDTH; TURN-TAKING; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84859563654     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/295665.295678     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Buxton, W.A.S., Sellen, A.J., and Sheasby, M.C. Interfaces for multiparty videoconferences, in Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., Wilbur, S.B. (Eds.), Video-Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997, 385-400.
2. Crowcroft, J. Supporting videoconferencing on the Internet, in Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., Wilbur, S.B. (Eds.), Video-Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997, 519-540.
3. Culnan, M.J., and Markus, M.L. Information technologies, in Jablin, F., Putnam, L., Roberts, K., and Porter, L. (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Sage, Newbury Park CA 1987, 420-443.
4. Hall, J., and Watson, W.H. The effects of a normative intervention on group decision-making performance. Human Relations 23A (1970), 299-317.
5. Harmon, J., Schneer, J.A., and Hoffman, L.R. Electronic meetings and established decision groups: Audioconferncing effects on perfomance and structural stability. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 61, 2 (1995), 138-147.
6. Innami, I. The quality of group decisions, group verbal behavior, and intervention. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 60, 3 (1994), 409-430.
7. Isaacs, E.A., and Tang, J.C. Studying video-based collaboration in context From small workgroups to large organizations, in Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., Wilbur, S.B. (Eds.), Video-Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997, 173-197.
8. Kathleen, E.F. Introduction: An overview of video- mediated communication literature, in Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., Wilbur, S.B. (Eds.), Video-Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997, 3-21.
9. Kiesler, S., and Sproull, L. Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 52 (1992), 96-123.
10. Lane, D.M. HyperStat: Rice virtual lab in statistics home page. Available at http://www.ruf.rice.edu/-lane/hyperstat/
11. Mane, A. Group space: The role of video in multipoint videoconferencing and its implications for design, in Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., Wilbur, S.B. (Eds.), Video- Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997, 401-414.
12. McGrath, J.E. Groups: Interaction and performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1984.
13. Olson, J.S., Olson, G.M., and Meader, D. Face-to-face group work compared to remote group with and without video, in Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., Wilbur, S.B. (Eds.), Video-Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997, 157-172.
14. Radford, G.P., Morganstern, B.F., McMickle, C.W., and Lehr, J.K. The impact of four conferencing formats on the efficiency and quality of small group decision making in a labolatory experiment setting. Telematics and Informatics 11, 2(1994), 97-109.
15. Telecommunication standardization sector of International Telecommunication Union. ITU-T Recommendation H.231: Multipoint control units for audiovisual sysytems using digital channels up to 2 Mbit/s. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, 1996.
16. Telecommunication standardization sector of International Telecommunication Union. ITU-T Recommendation H.243: Procedures for establishing communication between three or more audiovisual terminals using digital channels up to 2 Mbit/s. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, 1996.
17. vie - Video Conferencing Tool. Available at http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/vic/
18. Whittaker, S., and O'Conaill, B. The role of vision in face-to-face and mediated communication, in Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., Wilbur, S.B. (Eds.), Video-Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997, 23-49.
19. Williams, E. Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin 84, 5(1977), 963-976.