Personalized Genomic Educational Testing: What Do the Undergrads Think?

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 43-45

  Austriaco, Nicanor Pier Giorgio ^a  

^a PROVIDENCE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ARTICLE; DNA SEQUENCE; EDUCATION; ETHICS; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

DNA; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EDUCATION, PHARMACY, GRADUATE; GENETIC RESEARCH; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; NONTHERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84859563478     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656818     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Austriaco, N. P. G. Submitted. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the college classroom: Knowledge, attitudes, and concerns of introductory biology students.
2. Baars, M. J., Henneman, L. and Ten Kate, L. P. 2005. Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: A global problem. Genetics in Medicine, 7(9): 605-610.
3. Callier, S. L. 2012. Swabbing students: Should universities be allowed to facilitate educational DNA testing?. American Journal of Bioethics, 12(4): 32-40.
4. Goddard, K. A., Robitaille, J.Dowling, N. F. 2009. Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic tests: A public health assessment and analysis of practices related to Internet-based tests for risk of thrombosis. Public Health Genomics, 12(2): 92-104.
5. Jabr, F. 2011. Exposing the student body: Stanford joins U.C. Berkeley in controversial genetic testing of students. Scientific American., Available at: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id = exposing-the-student-body (accessed December 28, 2011)
6. Kolor, K., Liu, T., Pierre, J. St. and Khoury, M. J. 2009. Health care provider and consumer awareness, perceptions, and use of direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests. Genetics in Medicine, 11(8): 595
7. McGuire, A. L. and Burke, W. 2008. An unwelcome side effect of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: Raiding the medical commons. Journal of the American Medical Association, 300(22): 2669-2671.
8. McGuire, A. L., Diaz, C. M., Wang, T. and Hilsenbeck, S. G. 2009. Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(6-7): 3-10.
9. Ormond, K. E., Hudgins, L., Ladd, J. M., Magnus, D. M., Greely, H. T. and Cho, M. K. 2011. Genetics in Medicine, 13(5): 400-408.
10. Sanders, R. 2010. Tempest in a spit cup. UC Berkeley News, Available at: http://berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2010/09/10_tempest_over_DNA_testing.shtml (accessed December 28, 2011)