Fusing telomeres with RNF8

Nucleus

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Jacobs, Jacqueline J L ^a  

^a NETHERLANDS CANCER INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

DNA damage; Genomic instability; RNF8; Telomeres; Ubiquitin

Indexed keywords

RNF168 ENZYME; RNF8 ENZYME; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL DIVISION; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; GENOME; HUMAN; NEOPLASM; NONHUMAN; TELOMERE;

EID: 84859530323     PISSN: 19491034     EISSN: 19491042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/nucl.3.2.19322     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011; 144:646-74; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
2. Artandi SE, DePinho RA. Telomeres and telomerase in cancer. Carcinogenesis 2010; 31:9-18; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgp268
3. Davoli T, de Lange T. The causes and consequences of polyploidy in normal development and cancer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2011; 27:585-610; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurevcellbio-092910-154234
4. de Lange T. How telomeres solve the end-protection problem. Science 2009; 326:948-52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1170633
5. de Lange T. How shelterin solves the telomere endprotection problem. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2010; 75:167-77; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2010.75.017
6. O'Sullivan RJ, Karlseder J. Telomeres: protecting chromosomes against genome instability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11:171-81; 14:2302-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.025
7. Jacobs JJ, de Lange T. Significant role for p16INK4a in p53-independent telomere-directed senescence. Curr Biol 2004; 14:2302-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.025
8. Jacobs JJ, de Lange T. p16INK4a as a second effector of the telomere damage pathway. Cell Cycle 2005; 4:1364-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.4.10.2104
9. Blasco MA. The epigenetic regulation of mammalian telomeres. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8:299-309; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2047
10. Lejnine S, Makarov VL, Langmore JP. Conserved nucleoprotein structure at the ends of vertebrate and invertebrate chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995; 92:2393-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.6.2393
11. Makarov VL, Lejnine S, Bedoyan J, Langmore JP. Nucleosomal organization of telomere-specific chromatin in rat. Cell 1993; 73:775-87; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90256-P
12. Tommerup H, Dousmanis A, de Lange T. Unusual chromatin in human telomeres. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14:5777-85; 369:1153-62; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2007.04.027
13. Pisano S, Marchioni E, Galati A, Mechelli R, Savino M, Cacchione S. Telomeric nucleosomes are intrinsically mobile. J Mol Biol 2007; 369:1153-62; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2007.04.027
14. Giraud-Panis MJ, Pisano S, Poulet A, Le Du MH, Gilson E. Structural identity of telomeric complexes. FEBS Lett 2010; 584:3785-99; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2010.08.004
15. Harley CB, Futcher AB, Greider CW. Telomeres shorten during ageing of human fibroblasts. Nature 1990; 345:458-60; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/345458a0
16. Polo SE, Jackson SP. Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications. Genes Dev 2011; 25:409-33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2021311
17. Lukas J, Lukas C, Bartek J. More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13:1161-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2344
18. Takai H, Smogorzewska A, de Lange T. DNA damage foci at dysfunctional telomeres. Curr Biol 2003; 13:1549-56; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00542-6
19. d'Adda di Fagagna F, Reaper PM, Clay-Farrace L, Fiegler H, Carr P, Von Zglinicki T, et al. A DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescence. Nature 2003; 426:194-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02118
20. van Attikum H, Fritsch O, Hohn B, Gasser SM. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 2004; 119:777-88; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.033
21. Tsukuda T, Fleming AB, Nickoloff JA, Osley MA. Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2005; 438: 379-83; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04148
22. Kruhlak MJ, Celeste A, Dellaire G, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Müller WG, McNally JG, et al. Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks. J Cell Biol 2006; 172:823-34; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200510015
23. Berkovich E, Monnat RJ, Jr., Kastan MB. Roles of ATM and NBS1 in chromatin structure modulation and DNA double-strand break repair. Nat Cell Biol 2007; 9:683-90; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1599
24. Wu P, de Lange T. No overt nucleosome eviction at deprotected telomeres. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28: 5724-35; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01764-07
25. Nakada S, Tai I, Panier S, Al-Hakim A, Iemura S, Juang YC, et al. Non-canonical inhibition of DNA damage-dependent ubiquitination by OTUB 1. Nature 2010; 466:941-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09297
26. Peuscher MH, Jacobs JJ. DNA-damage response and repair activities at uncapped telomeres depend on RNF 8. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13:1139-45; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2326
27. Huen MS, Grant R, Manke I, Minn K, Yu X, Yaffe MB, et al. RNF8 transduces the DNA-damage signal via histone ubiquitylation and checkpoint protein assembly. Cell 2007; 131:901-14; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.041
28. Mailand N, Bekker-Jensen S, Faustrup H, Melander F, Bartek J, Lukas C, et al. RNF8 ubiquitylates histones at DNA double-strand breaks and promotes assembly of repair proteins. Cell 2007; 131:887-900; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.040
29. Rai R, Li JM, Zheng H, Lok GT, Deng Y, Huen MS, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Rnf8 stabilizes Tpp1 to promote telomere end protection. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011; 18:1400-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2172
30. Dimitrova N, Chen YC, Spector DL, de Lange T. 53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility. Nature 2008; 456:524-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07433
31. Difilippantonio S, Gapud E, Wong N, Huang CY, Mahowald G, Chen HT, et al. 53BP1 facilitates longrange DNA end-joining during V(D)J recombination. Nature 2008; 456:529-33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07476
32. Acs K, Luijsterburg MS, Ackermann L, Salomons FA, Hoppe T, Dantuma NP. The AAA-ATPase VCP/p97 promotes 53BP1 recruitment by removing L3MBTL1 from DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011; 18:1345-50; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2188
33. Noon AT, Shibata A, Rief N, Löbrich M, Stewart GS, Jeggo PA, et al. 53BP1-dependent robust localized KAP-1 phosphorylation is essential for heterochromatic DNA double-strand break repair. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:177-84; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2017
34. Wu J, Chen Y, Lu LY, Wu Y, Paulsen MT, Ljungman M, et al. Chfr and RNF8 synergistically regulate ATM activation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011; 18:761-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2078
35. Denchi EL, de Lange T. Protection of telomeres through independent control of ATM and ATR by TRF2 and POT 1. Nature 2007; 448:1068-71; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06065
36. Konishi A, de Lange T. Cell cycle control of telomere protection and NHEJ revealed by a ts mutation in the DNA-binding domain of TRF 2. Genes Dev 2008; 22:1221-30; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1634008
37. Goodarzi AA, Noon AT, Deckbar D, Ziv Y, Shiloh Y, Löbrich M, et al. ATM signaling facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks associated with heterochromatin. Mol Cell 2008; 31:167-77; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.017
38. Moyal L, Lerenthal Y, Gana-Weisz M, Mass G, So S, Wang SY, et al. Requirement of ATM-dependent monoubiquitylation of histone H2B for timely repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell 2011; 41:529-42; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.02.015
39. Nakamura K, Kato A, Kobayashi J, Yanagihara H, Sakamoto S, Oliveira DV, et al. Regulation of homologous recombination by RNF20-dependent H2B ubiquitination. Mol Cell 2011; 41:515-28; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.02.002
40. Fierz B, Chatterjee C, McGinty RK, Bar-Dagan M, Raleigh DP, Muir TW. Histone H2B ubiquitylation disrupts local and higher-order chromatin compaction. Nat Chem Biol 2011; 7:113-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.501
41. Wu J, Huen MS, Lu LY, Ye L, Dou Y, Ljungman M, et al. Histone ubiquitination associates with BRCA1- dependent DNA damage response. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 29:849-60; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01302-08
42. Santos MA, Huen MS, Jankovic M, Chen HT, López-Contreras AJ, Klein IA, et al. Class switching and meiotic defects in mice lacking the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF 8. J Exp Med 2010; 207:973-81; http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20092308
43. Li L, Halaby MJ, Hakem A, Cardoso R, El Ghamrasni S, Harding S, et al. Rnf8 deficiency impairs class switch recombination, spermatogenesis, and genomic integrity and predisposes for cancer. J Exp Med 2010; 207:983-97; http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20092437
44. Chang W, Dynek JN, Smith S. TRF1 is degraded by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis after release from telomeres. Genes Dev 2003; 17:1328-33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1077103
45. Lee TH, Perrem K, Harper JW, Lu KP, Zhou XZ. The F-box protein FBX4 targets PIN2/TRF1 for ubiquitinmediated degradation and regulates telomere maintenance. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:759-68; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M509855200
46. Atanassov BS, Evrard YA, Multani AS, Zhang Z, Tora L, Devys D, et al. Gcn5 and SAGA regulate shelterin protein turnover and telomere maintenance. Mol Cell 2009; 35:352-64; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.015
47. Fujita K, Horikawa I, Mondal AM, Jenkins LM, Appella E, Vojtesek B, et al. Positive feedback between p53 and TRF2 during telomere-damage signalling and cellular senescence. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:1205-12; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2123
48. Bhanot M, Smith S. TIN2 stability is regulated by the E3 ligase Siah 2. Mol Cell Biol 2012; 32:376-84; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.06227-11
49. Verdun RE, Karlseder J. The DNA damage machinery and homologous recombination pathway act consecutively to protect human telomeres. Cell 2006; 127:709-20; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.034
50. Cesare AJ, Reddel RR. Alternative lengthening of telomeres: models, mechanisms and implications. Nat Rev Genet 2010; 11:319-30; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2763