State of the art: Urologic surgery;État de l'art: chirurgie urologique

Journal of Visceral Surgery

Volumn 148, Issue 5, 2011, Pages e27-e29

  Piechaud, P ^a  

^a CLINIQUE SAINT AUGUSTIN   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYSTECTOMY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; NEPHRECTOMY; PROSTATECTOMY; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

CYSTECTOMY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; NEPHRECTOMY; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84859523657     PISSN: 18787886     EISSN: 18787878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Ficarra V, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radial prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2009;55:1037–63.
2. Comité de cancérologie AFU. Critical analysis of the morbidity, functional and carcinologic results after radical prostatectomy according to surgical approach. Prog Urol 2010;20(8):547–52.
3. Ficarra, V., et al. A prospective non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int 104:4 (2009), 534–539.
4. Benway BM, Bhayani SB. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an international experience. Eur Urol 2010; in press.
5. Scoll, B.J., et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a large single-institutional experience. Urology 75:6 (2010), 1328–1334.
6. Gupta, N.P., et al. Outcome analysis of robotic pyeloplasty: a large single-centre experience. BJU Int 105:7 (2010), 980–983.
7. Kuehhas, F., Hohenfeliner, M., Robotic surgery in urology. Eur Urol Rev 5 (2010), 69–77.