Optimisation of the design of infrastructure components subject to progressive deterioration and extreme loads

Structure and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 655-667

  Sanchez Silva, Mauricio ^a   Klutke, Georgia Ann ^b   Rosowsky, David V ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

extreme loads; infrastructure; optimisation; progressive deterioration

Indexed keywords

ARRIVAL TIME; DESIGN AND OPERATIONS; DETERIORATION MODELS; EXTREME LOADS; IDENTICALLY DISTRIBUTED RANDOM VARIABLES; INFRASTRUCTURE; INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS; INTER-ARRIVAL TIME; LIFE CYCLE MODEL; LIFECYCLE COSTS; LIMIT STATE; OPTIMISATIONS; POINT PROCESS; RANDOM SHOCKS; REMAINING LIFE; SAFETY LEVEL; STRUCTURAL CONDITION; STRUCTURAL DETERIORATION; STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE; STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY; SUDDEN EVENTS;

BENCHMARKING; DETERIORATION; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

SHAPE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84859502674     PISSN: 15732479     EISSN: 17448980     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15732471003686157     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aven, T. J. and Jansen, U. 1999. Stochastic models in reliability Applications of mathematics: stochastic modelling and applied probability series Vol. 41. New York: Springer-Verlag
2. Barlow, R. E. and Poschan, F. 1965. Mathematical theory of reliability, New York: Wiley.
3. Bastidas, E. 2007. Integrated reliability model of biodeterioration and chloride ingress for reinforced concrete structures. Structural Safety, 30(2): 110-129.
4. Bastidas, E. 2009. Probabilistic lifetime assessment of RC structures subject to corrosion-fatigue deterioration. Structural Safety, 31: 84-96.
5. Bayer, S. 2003. Generation-adjusted discounting in long-term decision-making. International Journal of Sustainability Development, 6(1): 133-149.
6. Bremaud, P. 1981. Point processes and queues, Springer-Verlag: New York.
7. Corotis, R. B. Public versus private discounting for life-cycle cost. Proceedings of the ninth international conference on structural safety and reliability (ICOSSAR'05). June19-232005, Rome, Italy. Edited by: Augusti, G., Schuëller, G. I. and Ciampoli, M. Rotterdam: Millpress.
8. Esteva, L. 2002. Life-cycle optimization in the establishment of performance-acceptance parameters for seismic design. Structural Safety, 24(2-4): 187-204.
9. Feldman, R. M. 1977. Optimal replacement with semi-Markov shock models using discounted costs. Mathematical Operations Research, 2: 78-90.
10. Frangopol, D. M., Kallen, M.-J. and Noortwijk, M. 2004. Probabilistic models for life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: review and future directions. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 6(4): 197-212.
11. Hasofer, A. M. 1974. Design for infrequent overloads. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2(4): 387-388.
12. Johansson, P.-O. 2001. Is there a meaningful definition of the value of statistical life?. Health Economics, 20: 131-139.
13. Kleiner, Y. 2001. Scheduling inspection, renewal of large infrastructure assets. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 74: 136-143.
14. Klutke, G.-A. and Yang, Y. 2002. The availability of inspected systems subject to shocks and graceful degradation. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 51(3): 371-374.
15. Kubler, O. and Faber, M. H. Optimal design of infrastructure facilities subject to deterioration. Proceedings of the international conference on applied statistics and probability (ICASP'03). Edited by: Der Kiureighian, A., Madanat, S. and Pestana, J. M. pp.1031-1039. San Francisco: Millpress Science Publishers.
16. Mander, J. B. 2007. Incremental dynamic analysis applied to seismic financial risk assessment of bridges. Engineering Structures, 29(10): 2662-2672.
17. Mishalani, R. G. and Madanat, S. M. 2002. Computation of infrastructure transition probabilities using stochastic duration models. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 8(4): 139-148.
18. Mori, Y. and Ellingwood, B. 1994. Maintaining reliability of concrete structures-I: Role of inspection/repair. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 1203: 824-825.
19. Nakagawa, T. 1976. On a replacement problem of cumulative damage model. Operational Research Quaterly, 27(4, Part 1): 895-900.
20. Onoufriou, T. and Frangopol, D. M. 2002. Reliability based inspection optimization of complex structures: a brief retrospective. Computers and Structures, 80: 1133-1144.
21. Pandey, M. D. 1998. Probabilistic models for condition assessment of oil and gas pipelines. International Journal of Non-Destructive Testing and Evaluation, 31(5): 349-358.
22. Pate-Cornell, M. E. Discounting in risk analysis: capital vsersus human safety. Proceedings of the symposium on structural technology and risk, 1984, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON. Edited by: Grigoriu, M. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo Press.
23. Petcherdchoo, A. 2004. The NLCADS (New Life-Cycle Analysis of Deteriorating Structures) user's manual-a program to analyze the effects of multiple actions on reliability and condition profiles of groups of deteriorating structures Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics Research Series No. CU/SR-04/3, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 63
24. Rackwitz, R. 2000. Optimization-the basis for code making and reliability verification. Structural Safety, 22: 27-60.
25. Rackwitz, R., Lentz, A. and Faber, M. 2005. Socioeconomically sustainable civil engineering infrastructures by optimization. Structural Safety, 27: 187-229.
26. Rosemblueth, E. 1976. Optimum design for infrequent disturbances. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, 102(ST9): 1807-1825.
27. Rosemblueth, E. and Mendoza, E. 1971. Optimization in isostatic structures. ASCE Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 97(EM6): 1625-1642.
28. Sánchez-Silva, M., Klutke, G.-A. and Rosowsky, D. V. 2009. Life-cycle performance of structures subject to multiple deterioration mechanisms. Structural Safety, (under review)
29. Sánchez-Silva, M. and Rackwitz, R. 2004. Implications of the high quality index in the design of optimum structures to withstand earthquakes. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(6): 969-977.
30. Santander, C. F. and Sánchez-Silva, M. 2008. Design and maintenance-program optimization for large infrastructure systems. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 4(4): 297-309.
31. Streicher, H., Joanni, A. and Rackwitz, R. 2008. Cost-benefit optimization and risk acceptability for existing, aging but maintained structures. Structural Safety, 30: 375-393.
32. Val, D. and Stewart, M. 2003. "Life-cycle cost analysis as a tool for decision making". In Applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering, Edited by: Der Kiureighian, A., Madanat, S. and Pestana, J. M. 757-764. Rotterdam: Millpress.
33. Val, D. and Stewart, M. 2005. Decision analysis for deteriorating structures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 87(3): 377-385.
34. Valdez-Flores, C. and Feldman, R. M. 1989. A survey of preventive maintenance models for stochastically deteriorating single unit systems. Naval Research Logistics, 36: 419-446.
35. Wen, Y. K. and Kang, Y. J. 2001. Minimum building lifecycle cost design criteria-I: Methodology. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 127(3): 330-337.
36. Zuckerman, D. 1977. Replacement models under additive damage. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 24: 549-558.