Visual Argumentation in Scandinavian Political Advertising: A Cognitive, Contextual, and Reception Oriented Approach

Argumentation and Advocacy

Volumn 43, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 124-132

  Kjeldsen, Jens E ^a  

^a Study of Argumentation conference   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

argumentation; context; reception; rhetoric; visual

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859499601     PISSN: 10511431     EISSN: 25768476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00028533.2007.11821668     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adler, J. D., (2001, November 16). Med Venstre in muddergroften [With Venstre in the mud ditch]. B. T., p. 2.
2. Bakhtin, M. M., (1987). Speech genres and other late essays (C., Emerson & M., Holquist, Eds.; V. W., McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
3. Barthes, R., (1977). Image, music, text. London: Fontana Press.
4. Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L., (1996). Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 1–10.
5. Bitzer, L. F., (1959). Aristotle's enthymeme revisited. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 45, 399–408.
6. Bitzer, L. F., 1968. The rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1, 1–14.
7. Bitzer, L. F., (1980). Functional communication: A situational perspective. In E. E., White (Ed.), Rhetoric in transition: Studies in the nature and uses of rhetoric (pp. 21–38). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. Blair, J. A., (1996). The possibility and actuality of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 23–39.
9. Blair, J. A., (2004). The rhetoric of visual arguments. In C. A., Hill & M., Helmers (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 41–61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Brockriede, W., (1992). Where is argument? In W. L., Benoit, D., Hample, & P. J., Benoit (Eds.), Readings in argumentation (pp. 73–78). New York: Foris.
11. Cox, J. R., & Willard, C. A., (1982). Introduction: The field of argumentation. In J. R., Cox & C. A., Willard (Eds.), Advances in argumentation theory and research (pp. xiii–xlvii). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
12. Eco, U., (1979). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
13. Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., & Kruiger, T., (1987). Handbook of argumentation theory: A critical survey of classical backgrounds and modern studies. Providence, RI: Foris.
14. Ét budskap—men hvilket et [One message—but what a message]. (2001, November 16). Ekstra Bladet, p. 2.
15. Fleming, D., (1996). Can pictures be arguments? Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 11–22.
16. Groarke, L., (1996). Logic, art, and argument. Informal Logic, 18, 105–126.
17. Gronbeck, B. E., (1995). Unstated propositions: Relationships among verbal, visual, and acoustic languages. In S., Jackson (Ed.), Argumentation and values: Proceedings of the ninth SCA/AFA conference on argumentation (pp. 539–542). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
18. Hample, D., (1980). A cognitive view of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 17, 151–158.
19. Hample, D., (1992). A third perspective on argument. In W. L., Benoit, D., Hample, & P. J., Benoit (Eds.), Readings in argumentation (pp. 91–115). New York: Foris.
20. Hetz [Smear campaign], (2001, November 17). Politiken, p. 2.
21. Holquist, M., (1990). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. New York: Routledge.
22. Hughes, E. M. B. G., (1994). The logical choice: How political commercials use logic to win votes. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
23. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R., (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Jensen, C., & Bjerre, M., (2001, November 18). Grænser for gæstfrihed [Limited hospitality], Berlingske Tidende, p. 8.
25. Kassebeer, J., Thobo-Carlsen, J., & Termansen, J., (2001, November 15). V rykker grænsen for valgannoncer [V moves the boundary for campaign ads]. Berlingske Tidende, p. 2.
26. Kjeldsen, J. E., (2000). What the metaphor could not tell us about the Prime Minister's bicycle helmet: Rhetorical criticism of visual rhetoric. Nordicom Review, 21, 305–327.
27. Kjeldsen, J. E., (2001). The rhetorical power of pictures. In J., Gripsrud & F., Engelstad (Eds.), Power, aesthetics, media (pp. 132–157). Oslo: Unipub forlag.
28. Kjeldsen, J. E., (2002). Visuel retorik [Visual rhetoric. Bergen, Norway: Department of Media Studies, University of Bergen.
29. Kjeldsen, J. E., (2003). Talking to the eye—Visuality in ancient rhetoric. Word & Image, 19, 133–137.
30. Klarskov, K., (2001, November 16). Stærk reaktion over for Venstre annonce [Strong reaction toward Venstre ad], Politiken, p. 4.
31. Langager, M., (2001, November 16). Venstre-selvmål med annonce [Venstre scores an own-goal with advertisement]. Jyllands-Posten, p. 3.
32. Maressa, J. E., & Ditlev, N., (2001, November 15). Kritik af V-annonce [Critique of Venstre ad]. Jyllands-Posten, p. 4.
33. Megafon (2001, November 16). Hverken Venstre-annonce og Nyrups bog-angreb gav vœlgermedvind [Neither Venstre-advertisement nor the book-attack of Nyrup were successful]. Retrieved January 15, 2002, from http://folketingsvalg.tv2.dk/index.php?page-hgnews&od1248
34. Morris, P., (Ed.). (1994). The Bakhtin reader: Selected writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev, Voloshinov. London: Edward Arnold.
35. O'Keefe, D. J., (1982). The concepts of argument and arguing. In J. R., Cox & C. A., Willard (Eds.), Advances in argumentation theory and research (pp. 3–23). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
36. Østergaard-Nielsen, M., (2001, November 19). Fænomenet Fogh [The phenomenon Fogh]. Information, p. 8.
37. Schwartz, T., (1973). The responsive chord. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
38. Shelley, C., (1996). Rhetorical and demonstrative modes of visual argument: Looking at images of human evolution. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 53–68.
39. Skaaning, K., (2001, November 16). Sprinternes valgkamp [The campaign of the sprinters]. Erhvervs Bladet, n.p.
40. Toulmin, S., (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press. Usædvanlig ulækker [Extraordinarily repulsive]. (2001, November 19). Information, p. 4.
41. V-annonce splitter de borgerlige [V-ad divides the non-socialist parties]. (2001, November 16). B. T., p. 14.