메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 152-155

Content validity index in scale development

Author keywords

Chance agreement; Content validity; Content validity index; Scale

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

EID: 84859487631     PISSN: 16727347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (444)

References (11)
  • 2
    • 34548203767 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations [J]
    • Polit DF, Beck CT. Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations [J]. Res Nurs Health, 2007, 30(4):459-467.
    • (2007) Res Nurs Health , vol.30 , Issue.4 , pp. 459-467
    • Polit, D.F.1    Beck, C.T.2    Owen, S.V.3
  • 4
    • 0141541733 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity
    • DOI 10.1177/0193945903252998, Research Strategies in Nursing
    • Wynd CA, Schmidt B, Schaefer MA. Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity [J]. Western J Nurs Res, 2003, 25(5):508-518. (Pubitemid 38569354)
    • (2003) Western Journal of Nursing Research , vol.25 , Issue.5 , pp. 508-518
    • Wynd, C.A.1    Schmidt, B.2    Schaefer, M.A.3
  • 5
    • 0033147506 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A revised index of interrater agreement for multi-item ratings of a single target [J]
    • Lindell MK, Brandt CJ, Whitney DJ. A revised index of interrater agreement for multi-item ratings of a single target [J]. Appl Psychol Measurem, 1999, 23(2):127-135.
    • (1999) Appl Psychol Measurem , vol.23 , Issue.2 , pp. 127-135
    • Lindell, M.K.1    Brandt, C.J.2    Whitney, D.J.3
  • 6
    • 84986938722 scopus 로고
    • A quantitative approach to content validity [J]
    • Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity [J]. Personne Psychol, 1975, 28(4):563-575.
    • (1975) Personne Psychol , vol.28 , Issue.4 , pp. 563-575
    • Lawshe, C.H.1
  • 7
    • 84970245072 scopus 로고
    • Criterion-referenced testing and measurement: Review of technical issues and developments [J]
    • Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Algina J, et al. Criterion-referenced testing and measurement: Review of technical issues and developments [J]. Rev Educat Res, 1978, 48(1):11-22.
    • (1978) Rev Educat Res , vol.48 , Issue.1 , pp. 11-22
    • Hambleton, R.K.1    Swaminathan, H.2    Algina, J.3
  • 9
    • 0022970868 scopus 로고
    • Determination and quantification of content validity [J]
    • Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity [J]. Nursing Res, 1986, 35(6):382-385.
    • (1986) Nursing Res , vol.35 , Issue.6 , pp. 382-385
    • Lynn, M.R.1
  • 10
    • 58149208557 scopus 로고
    • Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel of experts [J]
    • Davis LL. Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel of experts [J]. Appl Nurs Res, 1992, 5(4):194-197.
    • (1992) Appl Nurs Res , vol.5 , Issue.4 , pp. 194-197
    • Davis, L.L.1
  • 11
    • 33750143276 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations
    • DOI 10.1002/nur.20147
    • Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations [J]. Res Nurs Health, 2006, 29(5):489-497. (Pubitemid 44594836)
    • (2006) Research in Nursing and Health , vol.29 , Issue.5 , pp. 489-497
    • Polit, D.F.1    Beck, C.T.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.