Sexual, fecundity, and viability selection on flower size and number in a sexually dimorphic plant

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1154-1166

  Delph, Lynda F ^a,b   Herlihy, Christopher R ^a,b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dioecy; Experimental arrays; Sexual dimorphism; Silene latifolia; Siring success

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; DIOECY; FECUNDITY; FLOWER; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; TRADE-OFF; VIABILITY;

ARTICLE; FLOWER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SILENE;

FLOWERS; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SILENE;

SILENE; SILENE LATIFOLIA;

EID: 84859443378     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01510.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
2. Arnold, S. J. 1994. Bateman's principal and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. Am. Nat. 144:S126-S149.
3. Badyaev, A.V., and T. E. Martin 2000. Sexual dimorphism in relation to current selection in the house finch. Evolution 54:987-997.
4. Bell, G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 224:223-265.
5. Blanckenhorn, W. U. 2007. Case studies of the differential-equilibrium hypothesis of sexual size dimorphism in two dung fly species. Pp. 106-114 in D. J. Fairbairn, W. U. Blanckenhorn, and T. Székely, eds. Sex, size, and gender roles. Evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
6. Boyko, A. R., R. M. Gibson, and J. R. Lucas 2004. How predation risk affects the temporal dynamics of avian leks: greater sage grouse versus golden eagle. Am. Nat. 163:154-165.
7. Bond, W. J., and K. E. Maze 1999. Survival costs and reproductive benefits of floral display in a sexually dimorphic dioecious shrub, Leucadendron xanthoconus. Am. Nat. 131:901-910.
8. Bonduriansky, R., A. Maklakov, F. Zajitschek, and R. Brooks 2008. Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and life span. Funct. Ecol. 22:443-453.
9. Carroll, S. B., and L. F. Delph 1996. The effects of gender and plant architecture on allocation to flowers in dioecious Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 157:493-500.
10. Charlesworth, D., D. Schemske, and V. L. Sork 1987. The evolution of plant characters; sexual versus natural selection. Pp. 317-335 in S. C. Stearns, ed. The evolution of sex and its consequences. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland
11. Darwin C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London
12. Delph, L. F. 2007. The genetic integration of sexually dimorphic traits in the dioecious plant, Silene latifolia. Pp. 115-123 in D. J. Fairbairn, W. U. Blanckenhorn, T. Székely, eds. Sex, size, and gender roles. Evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
13. Delph, L. F., and T.-L. Ashman 2006. Trait selection in flowering plants: how does sexual selection contribute?Int. Comp. Biol.46:465-472.
14. Delph, L. F., and D. Bell 2008. A test of the differential-plasticity hypothesis for variation in the degree of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifoliaEvol. Ecol. Res.10:61-75.
15. Delph, L. F., L. F. Galloway, and M. L. Stanton 1996. Sexual dimorphism in flower size. Am. Nat.148:299-320.
16. Delph, L. F., F. N. Knapczyk, D. R. Taylor 2002. Among-population variation and correlations in sexually dimorphic traits of Silene latifolia. J. Evol. Biol.15:1011-1020.
17. Delph, L. F., J. L. Gehring, F. M. Frey, A. M. Arntz, and M. Levri 2004. Genetic constraints on floral evolution in a sexually dimorphic plant revealed by artificial selection. Evolution58:1936-1946.
18. Delph, L. F., J. L. Gehring, A. M. Arntz, M. Levri, and F. M. Frey 2005. Genetic correlations with floral display lead to sexual dimorphism in the cost of reproduction. Am. Nat.166:S31-S41.
19. Delph, L. F., A. M. Arntz, C. Scotti-Santiagne, and I. Scotti 2010. Quantitative trait loci and genomic architecture of sexual dimorphism in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Evolution64:2873-2886.
20. Delph, L. F., J. Andicoechea, J. C. Steven, C. R. Herlihy, S. V. Scarpino, and D. L. Bell 2011. Environment-dependent intralocus sexual conflict in a dioecious plant. New Phytol. 192:542-552.
21. Emlen, S. T. 1976. Lek organization and mating strategies in the bullfrog. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1:282-313.
22. Emms, S. K., D. A. Stratton, and A. A. Snow 1997. The effect of inflorescence size on male fitness: experimental tests in the andromonoecious lily, Zigadenus paniculatus. Evolution 51:1481-1489.
23. Fairbairn, D. J., W. U. Blanckenhorn, and T. Székely 2007. Sex, size and gender roles. Evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
24. Frey, F. M., L. F. Delph, B. Dinneen, and C. Twomey 2007. The evolution of sexually dimorphic flower production under sexual, fertility, and viability selection. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9:1-19.
25. Geber, M. A., T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph 1999. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin
26. Gehring, J. L., and L. F. Delph 1999. Fine-scale genetic structure and clinal variation in Silene acaulis despite high gene flow. Heredity 82:628-637.
27. Herlihy, C. R., and L. F. Delph 2009. Differential response of floral attractiveness and gametophyte production to stress in flower-size selection lines of Silene latifolia (Caryophyllsaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 170:1103-1108.
28. Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292-305.
29. Meagher, T. R. 1999. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphim. Pp. 275-294, in M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson and L. F. Delph, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin
30. Murphy, C. G. 1998. Interaction-independent sexual selection and the mechanisms of sexual selection. Evolution 52:8-18.
31. Preziosi, R. F., and D. J. Fairbairn 2000. Lifetime selection on adult body size and compoenents of body size in a waterstrider: opposing selection and maintenance of sexual size dimorphism. Evolution 54:558-566.
32. Price, T. D. 1984. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in Darwin's finches. Am. Nat. 123:500-518.
33. Purrington, C. B., and J. Schmitt 1998. Consequences of sexually dimorphic timing of emergence and flowering in Silene latifolia. J. Ecol. 86:397-404.
34. Ralls, K. 1976. Mammals in which females are larger than males. Quart. Rev. Biol. 51:245-276.
35. Shykoff, J. A., and E. Bucheli 1995. Pollinator visitation patterns, floral rewards and the probability of transmission of Microbotryum violaceum, a venereal disease of plants. J. Ecol. 83:189-198.
36. Stanton, M. L. 1984. Developmental and genetic sources of seed weight variation in Raphanus raphanistrum L. (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 71:1090-1098.
37. Steven, J. C., L. F. Delph, and E. D. Brodie III. 2007. Sexual dimorphism in the quantitative-genetic architecture of floral, leaf, and allocation traits in Silene latifolia. Evolution 61:42-57.
38. Travers, S. E., and S. J. Mazer 2001. Trade-offs between male and female reproduction associated with allozyme variation in phosphoglucoisomerase in an annual plant (Clarkia unguiculata: Onagraceae). Evolution 55:2421-2428.
39. Wilkelski, M., and F. Trillmich 1997. Body size and sexual size dimorphism in marine iguanas fluctuate as a result of opposing natural and sexual selection: an island comparison. Evolution 51:922-936.
40. Yu, Q., E. D. Ellen, M. J. Wade, and L. F. Delph 2011. Genetic differences among populations in sexual dimorphism: evidence for selection on males in a dioecious plant. J. Evol. Biol. 24:1120-1127.
41. Zhang, Y. H., V. S. Di Stilio, F. Rehman, A. Avery, D. Mulcahy, and R. Kesseli 1998. Y chromosome specific markers and the evolution of dioecy in the genus Silene. Genome 41:141-147.