Direct benefits of genetic mosaicism and intraorganismal selection: Modeling coevolution between a long-lived tree and a short-lived herbivore

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1091-1113

  Folse, Henry J ^a,b   Roughgarden, Joan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coevolution; Herbivory; Intraorganismal selection; Mosaicism; Plant defense

Indexed keywords

PHEROMONE;

ALLELE; COEVOLUTION; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FITNESS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HERBIVORE; HETEROGENEITY; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MUTATION; PLANT DEFENSE; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SELECTION;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HERBIVORY; INSECT; LONGEVITY; METABOLISM; MOSAICISM; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; TREE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; GENETIC FITNESS; HERBIVORY; INSECTS; LONGEVITY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOSAICISM; MUTATION; PHEROMONES; SELECTION, GENETIC; TREES;

EID: 84859443155     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01500.x     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Abrams, P. A. 2000. The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31:79-105.
2. Agrawal, A., and C. M. Lively 2002. Infection genetics: gene-for-gene versus matching alleles models and all points in between. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4:79-90.
3. Aker, C. L. 1982. Regulation of flower, fruit and seed production by a monocarpic perennial, Yucca whipplei. J. Ecol. 70:357-372.
4. Alstad, D. N. 1998. Population structure and the conundrum of local adaptation. Pp. 3-21 in S. Mopper, and S. Y. Strauss, eds. Genetic structure and local adapation in natural insect populations: effects of ecology, life history, and behavior. Chapman & Hall, New York
5. Antolin, M. F., and C. Strobeck 1985. The population genetics of somatic mutation in plants. Am. Nat. 126:52-62.
6. Augspurger, C. K. 1985. Demography and life history variation of Puya dasylirioides, a long-lived rosette in tropical subalpine bogs. Oikos 45:341-352.
7. Bergelson, J., G. Dwyer, and J. J. Emerson 2001. Models and data on plant-enemy coevolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35:469-499.
8. Buss, L. W. 1982. Somatic cell parasitism and the evolution of somatic tissue compatibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 79:5337-5341.
9. Buss, L. W. 1987. The evolution of individuality. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
10. Clarke, E. 2010. Plant individuality and multilevel selection theory. Pp. 227-250 in B. Calcott, and K. Sterelny, eds. The major transitions in evolution revisited. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
11. Cloutier, D., D. Rioux, J. Beaulieu, and D. J. Schoen 2003. Somatic stability of microsatellite loci in Eastern white pine, Pinus strobus L. Heredity 90:247-252.
12. Cook, R. E., and E. E. Lyons 1983. The biology of Viola fimriatula in a natural disturbance. Ecology 64:654-660.
13. Damuth, J., and I. L. Heisler 1985. Alternative formulations of multilevel selection. Biol. Philos. 3:407-430.
14. Dawkins, R. 1982. The extended phenotype: the gene as the unit of selection. W. H. Freeman and Company, Oxford
15. Dieckmann, U., P. Marrow, and R. Law 1995. Evolutionary cycling in predator-prey interactions: population dynamics and the Red Queen. J. Theor. Biol. 176:91-102.
16. Doebeli, M. 1996. An explict genetic model for ecological character displacement. Ecology 77:510-520.
17. Dudash, M. R. 1991. Plant size effects on female and male function in hermaphroditic Sabatia angularis (Gentianaceae). Ecology 72:1004-1012.
18. Edmunds, G. F., and D. N. Alstad 1978. Coevolution in insect herbivores and conifers. Science 199:941-945.
19. Edwards, P. B., W. J. Wanjura, and W. V. Bron 1990. Mosaic resistance in plants. Nature 347:434.
20. Egan, S. P., and J. R. Ott 2007. Host plant quality and local adaptation determine the distribution of a gall-forming herbivore. Ecology 88:2868-2879.
21. Fagerstrom, T. 1992. The meristem-meristem cycle as a basis for defining fitness in clonal plants. Oikos 63:449-453.
22. Feeny, P. P. 1976. Plant apparency and chemical defense. Recent Adv. Phytochem. 10:1-40.
23. Flor, H. H. 1956. The complementary genetics systems in flax and flax rust. Adv. Genet. 8:29-54.
24. Folse, H., and J. Roughgarden 2010. What is an individual organism? A multilevel selection perspective. Q. Rev. Biol. 85:447-472.
25. Frank, S. A. 1993. Coevolutionary genetics of plants and pathogens. Evol. Ecol. 9:45-75.
26. Frank, S. A. 1996. Statistical properties of polymorphism in host-parasite genetics. Evol. Ecol. 10:307-317.
27. Gassmann, A. J., D. W. Onstad, and B. R. Pittendrigh 2009. Evolutionary analysis of herbivorous insects in natural and agricultural environments. Pest Manage. Sci. 65:1174-1181.
28. Gavrilets, S. 1997. Coevolutionary chase in exploiter-victim systems with polygenic characters. J. Theor. Biol. 186:527-534.
29. Gill, D. E., L. Chao, S. L. Perkins, and J. B. Wolf 1995. Genetic mosaicism in plants and clonal animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:423-444.
30. Grant, M. W., and S. A. Archer 1983. Calculation of selection coefficients against unnecessary genes for virulence from field data. Phytopathology 73:547-551.
31. Grosberg, R. K., and R. R. Strathmann 1998. One cell, two cell, red cell, blue cell: the persistence of a unicellular stage in multicellular life histories. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3:112-116.
32. Gross, K. L. 1981. Prediction of fate from rosette size in four biennial plant species: Verbascum thapsus, Oenothera biennis, Daucus carota, and Tragopogon dubius. Oecologia 48:209-213.
33. Hadany, L. 2001. A conflict between two evolutionary levels in trees. J. Theor. Biol. 208:507-521.
34. Hamilton, W. D., R. Axelrod, and R. Tanese 1990. Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:3566-3573.
35. Hanks, L. M., and R. F. Denno 1994. Local adapation in the armored scale insect Pseudaulacaspis pentagona (Homoptera: Diaspididae). Ecology 75:2301-2310.
36. Hanzawa, F. M., and S. Kalisz 1993. The relationship between age, size, and reproduction in Trillium grandiflorum (Liliaceae).
37. Harper, J. L. 1980. Plant demography and ecological theory. Oikos 35:244-253.
38. Harper J.L. 1988. An apophasis of plant population biology. Pp. 435-452 in A. J. Davy, M. J. Hutchings, and A. R. Watkinson, eds. Plant population biology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, U.K
39. Hastings, I. M. 1991. Germline selection: population genetic aspects of the sexual/asexual life cycle. Genetics 129:1167-1176.
40. Hirose, T., and N. Kachi 1982. Critical plant size for flowering in biennials with special reference to their distribution in a sand dune system. Oecologia 55:281-284.
41. Hoeksema, J. D., and S. E. Forde 2008. A meta-analysis of factors affecting local adaptation between interacting species. Am. Nat. 171:275-290.
42. Hutchings, M. J., and D. Booth 2004. Much ado about nothing... so far? J. Evol. Biol. 17:1184-1186.
43. Innouye, D. W., and O. R. Taylor, Jr. 1980. Variation in generation time in Frasera speciosa (Gentianaceae), a long-lived perennial monocarp. Oecologia 47:171-174.
44. Ives, A., P. Glaum, N. Ziebarth, and D. Andow 2011. The evolution of resistance to two-toxin pyramid transgenic crops. Ecol. Appl. 21:503-515.
45. Janzen, D. H. 1977. What are dandelions and aphids. Am. Nat. 111:586-589.
46. Kawecki, T. J., and D. Ebert 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7:1225-1241.
47. Keen, N. T. 1990. Gene for gene complementarity in plant-pathogen interactions. Annu. Rev. Genet. 24:447-463.
48. Klekowski, E. J., and N. Kazarinova-Fukshansky 1984. Shoot apical meristems and mutation: selective loss of disadvantageous cell genotypes. Am. J. Bot. 71:28-34.
49. Klekowski, E. J., N. Kazarinova-Fukshansky, and H. Mohr 1985. Shoot apical meristems and mutation: stratified meristems and angiosperm evolution. Am. J. Bot. 72:1788-1800.
50. Klinkhamer, P. G. L., and T. J. De Jong 1987. Plant size and seed production in the monocarpic perennial Cynoglossum officinale L. New Phytol. 106:773-783.
51. Klinkhamer, P. G. L., E. Meelis, T. J. De Jong, and J. Weiner 1992. On the analysis of size-dependent reproductive output in plants. Funct. Ecol. 6:308-316.
52. Leonard, K. J. 1977. Selection pressures and plant pathogens. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 287:207-222.
53. Luria, S. E., and M. Delbrük 1943. Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics 28:491-511.
54. Maillette, L. 1982. Structural dynamics of silver birch II. A matrix model of the bud population. J. Appl. Ecol. 19:219-238.
55. Michod, R. E. 2005. On the transfer of fitness from the cell to the multicellular organism. Biol. Philos. 20:967-987.
56. Michod, R. E., and D. Roze 2001. Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of multicellularity. Heredity 86:1-7.
57. Monro, K., and A. G. Poore 2009. The potential for evolutionary responses to cell-lineage selection on growth form and its plasticity in a red seaweed. Am. Nat. 173:151-163.
58. Mopper, S. 1996. Adaptive genetic structure in phytophagous insect populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:235-238.
59. Mopper, S., M. Beck, D. Simberloff, and P. Stiling 1995. Local adaptation and agents of selection in a mobile insect. Evolution 49:810-815.
60. Mopper, S., P. Stiling, K. Landau, D. Simberloff, and P. A. Van Zandt 2000. Spatiotemporal variation in leafminer population structure and adaptation to individual oak trees. Ecology 81:1577-1587.
61. Nuismer, S. L., and M. Doebeli 2004. Genetic correlations and the coevolutionary dynamics of three-species systems. Evolution 58:1165-1177.
62. Nuismer, S. L., M. Doebeli, and D. Browning 2005. The coevolutionary dynamics of antagonistic interactions mediated by quantitative traits with evolving variances. Evolution 59:2073-2082.
63. O'Connell, L. M., and K. Ritland. 2004. Somatic mutations at microsatellite loci in Western Redcedar (Thuja plicata: Cupressaceae). J. Hered. 95:172-176.
64. Okasha, S. 2006. Evolution and the levels of selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford
65. Orive, M. E. 2001. Somatic mutations in organisms with complex life hisories. Theor. Popul. Biol. 59:235-249.
66. Otto, S. P., and I. M. Hastings 1998. Mutation and selection within the individual. Genetica 102/103:507-524.
67. Otto, S. P., and M. E. Orive 1995. Evolutionary consequences of mutation and selection within an individual. Genetics 141:1173-1187.
68. Pan, J. J., and J. S. Price 2002. Fitness and evolution in clonal plants: the impact of clonal growth. Evol. Ecol. 15:583-600.
69. Parker, M. A. 1994. Pathogens and sex in plants. Evol. Ecol. 8:560-584.
70. Peterson, D. L., and F. A. Bazzaz 1978. Life cycle characteristics of Aster pilosus in early succesional habitats. Ecology 59:1005-1013.
71. Pineda-Krch, M., and T. Fagerstrom 1999. On the potential for evolutionary change in meristematic cell lineages through intraorganismal selection. J. Evol. Biol. 12:681-688.
72. Pineda-Krch, M., and K. Lehtilä 2002. Cell lineage dynamics in stratified shoot apical meristems. J. Theor. Biol. 219:495-505.
73. Pineda-Krch, M., and K. Lehtilä 2004. Costs and benefits of genetic heterogeneity within organisms. J. Evol. Biol. 17:1167-1177.
74. Poore, A. G. B., and T. Fagerstrom 2001. A general model for selection among modules in haplo-diploid life histories. Oikos 92:256-264.
75. Queller, D. C. 2000. Relatedness and the fraternal major transitions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 355:1647-1655.
76. Reinartz, J. A. 1984. Life history variation of common mullein (Verbascum thapsus): I. Latitudinal differences in population dynamics and timing of reproduction. J. Ecol. 72:897-912.
77. Roslin, T., A.-L. Laine, and S. Gripenberg 2007. Spatial population structure in an obligate plant pathogen colonizing oak Quercus robur. Funct. Ecol. 21:1168-1177.
78. Santelices, B. 1999. How many kinds of individual are there? Trends Ecol. Evol. 14:152-155.
79. Sasaki, A. 2000. Host-parasite coevolution in a multilocus gene-for-gene system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:2183-2188.
80. Schmid, B., F. A. Bazzaz, and J. Weiner 1995. Size dependency of sexual reproduction and of clonal growth in two perennial plants. Can. J. Bot. 73:1831-1837.
81. Seger, J. 1988. Review of the evolution of individualiy by L. W. Buss. Q. Rev. Biol. 63:336-337.
82. Solbrig, O. T. 1981. Studies on the population biology of the genus Viola. II. The effect of plant size on fitness in Viola sororia. Evolution 35:1080-1093.
83. Szabo, L. 1992. Interleaf and intraleaf distribution of gall formers on Quercus cerris; the organization of the leaf-galling community. Oecologia 13:269-277.
84. Tabashnik, B., A. J. Gassmann, D. W. Crowder, and Y. Carrière 2008. Insect resistance to Bt crops: evidence versus theory. Nat. Biotechnol. 26:199-202.
85. Thompson, J. N., and J. J. Burdon 1992. Gene-for-gene coevolution between plants and parasites. Nature 360:121-125.
86. Tuomi, J., and T. Vuorisalo 1989. What are the units of selection in modular organisms? Oikos 54: 227-233.
87. Tyutyunov, Y., E. Zhadanovskaya, D. Bourguet, and R. Arditi 2008. Landscape refuges delay resistance of the European corn borer to Bt-maize: a demo-genetic dynamic model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 74:138-146.
88. van der Meijden, E., and R. E. van der Waals-Kooi 1979. The population ecology of Senecio jacobaea in a sand dune system: I. Reproductive strategy and the biennial habit. J. Ecol. 67:131-153.
89. Van Zandt, P. A., and S. Mopper 1998. A meta-analysis of adaptive deme formation in phytophagous insect populations. Am. Nat. 152:595-604.
90. Werner, P. A. 1975. Predictions of fate from rosette size in teasel (Dipsacus fullonum L.). Oecologia 20:197-201.
91. Werner, P. A., and H. Caswell 1977. Population growth rates and age versus stage-distribution models for teasel (Dipsacus sylvestris Huds.). Ecology 58:1103-1111.
92. White, J. 1979. The plant as metapopulation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10:109-145.
93. Whitham, T. G., and C. N. Slobodchikoff 1981. Evolution by individuals, plant-herbivore interactions, and mosaics of genetic variability: the adaptive significance of somatic mutations in plants. Oecologia 49:287-292.
94. Young, T. P. 1984. The comparative demography of semelparous Lobelia telekii and iteroparous Lobelia keniensis on Mount Kenya. J. Ecol. 72:637-650.