Functional pleiotropy and mating system evolution in plants: Frequency-independent mating

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 957-972

  Jordan, Crispin Y ^a   Otto, Sarah P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Mixed mating; Pollen discounting; Prior selfing; Selfing rate; Viability

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; FITNESS; FLORAL TRAIT; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MORPHOLOGY; MUTATION; OUTCROSSING; PLEIOTROPY; POLLEN;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; PLANT; PLEIOTROPY; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION; SELF FERTILIZATION;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; GENETIC PLEIOTROPY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANTS; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION; SELF-FERTILIZATION;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 84859440882     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01513.x     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Aizen, M. A., and L. D. Harder 2007. Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality. Ecology 88:271-281.
2. Armbruster, W. S., C. P. H. Mulder, B. G. Baldwin, S. Kalisz, B. Wessa, and H. Nute 2002. Comparative analysis of late floral development and mating-system evolution in tribe Collinsieae (Scrophulariaceae S.L.). Am. J. Bot. 89:37-49.
3. Armbruster, W. S., C. Pélabon, T.F. Hansen, and C.P.H. Mulder 2004. Floral integration, modularity and accuracy: distinguishing complex adaptations from genetic constraints. Pp. 23-49 in M. Pigliucci and K. Preston, eds. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY
4. Barrett, S. C. H. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:274-284.
5. Brunet, J., and H. R. Sweet 2006. The maintenance of selfing in a population of the rocky mountain columbine. Int. J. Plant Sci. 167:213-219.
6. Byers, D. L., and D. M. Waller 1999 Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:479-513.
7. Chang, S.-M., and M. D. Rausher 1998. Frequency-dependent pollen discounting contributes to maintenance of a mixed mating system in the common morning glory Ipomoea purpurea. Am. Nat. 152:671-683.
8. Charlesworth, B. 1980. The cost of sex in relation to mating system. J. Theor. Biol. 84:655-671.
9. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth 1999. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet. Res. 74:329-340.
10. Charlesworth, D., M. T. Morgan, and B. Charlesworth 1990. Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution 44:1469-1489.
11. Charlesworth, D., and J. H. Willis 2009. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10:783-796.
12. Crnokrak, P., and S. C. H. Barrett 2002. Purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56:2347-2358.
13. Delph, L. F., J. L. Gehring, F. M. Frey, A. M. Arntz, and M. Levri 2004. Genetic constraints on floral evolution in a sexually dimorphic plant revealed by artificial selection. Evolution 58:1936-1946.
14. Eckert, C. G., and C. R. Herlihy 2004. Using a cost-benefit approach to understand the evolution of self-fertilization in plants: the perplexing case of Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae). Plant Species Biol. 19:159-173.
15. Elle, E.. 2004. Floral adaptations and biotic and abiotic selection pressures. Pp. 111-118 in Q. Cronk, J. Whitton, R. Ree, and I. Taylor, eds. Plant adaptation: molecular genetics and ecology. Proceedings of an International Workshop, December 11-13, 2002, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario
16. Epinat, G., and T. Lenormand 2009. The evolution of assortative mating and selfing with in- and outbreeding depression. Evolution 63:2047-2060.
17. Eshel, I. 1996. On the changing concept of evolutionary population stability as a reflection of a changing point of view in the quantitative theory of evolution. J. Math. Biol. 34:485-510.
18. Fenster, C. B., P. K. Diggle, S. Barrett, and K. Ritland 1995. The genetics of floral development differentiating two species of Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). Heredity 74:258-266.
19. Fisher, R. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann. Eugen. 11:53-63.
20. Fishman, L. 2000. Pollen discounting and the evolution of selfing in Arenariauniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 54:1558-1565.
21. Fishman, L., A. J. Kelly, and J. H. Willis 2002. Minor quantitative trait loci underlie floral traits associated with mating system divergence in Mimulus. Evolution 56:2138-2155.
22. Fishman, L., and D. A. Stratton 2004. The genetics of floral divergence and postzygotic barriers between outcrossing and selfing populations of Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 58:296-307.
23. Foxe, J. P., T. Slotte, E. A. Stahl, B. Neuffer, H. Hurka, and S. I. Wright 2009. Recent speciation associated with the evolution of selfing in Capsella. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106:5241-5245.
24. Friedman, J., and S. C. H Barrett 2009. Wind of change: new insights on the ecology and evolution of pollination and mating in wind-pollinated plants. Ann. Bot. 103:1515-1527.
25. Galen, C.. 1999. Why do flowers vary? BioScience 49:631640.
26. Galen, C., R. A. Sherry, and A. B. Carroll 1999. Are flowers physiological sinks or faucets? Costs and correlates of water use by flowers of Polemoniumviscosum. Oecologia 118:461-470.
27. Goodwillie, C., Kalisz, S. and Eckert, C. G. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36:47-79.
28. Guerrant, E.. 1989. Early maturity, small flowers, and autogamy: a developmental connection? Pp. 61-84 in J. Bock and Y. Linhart, eds. The evolutionary ecology of plants. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
29. Hainsworth, F. R., T. Mercier, and L. L. Wolf 1983. Floral arrangements and hummingbird feeding. Oecologia 58:225-229.
30. Harder, L. D., C. Y. Jordan, W. E. Gross, and M. B. Routley 2004. Beyond floricentrism: the pollination function of inflorescences. Plant Species Biol. 19:137-148.
31. Harder, L. D., S. A. Richards, and M. B. Routley 2008. Effects of reproductive compensation, gamete discounting and reproductive assurance on mating-system diversity in hermaphrodites. Evolution 62:157-172.
32. Harder, L. D., and W. G. Wilson 1998. A clarification of pollen discounting and its joint effects with inbreeding depression on mating system evolution. Am. Nat. 152:684-695.
33. Holsinger, K. E.. 1991. Mass-action models of plant mating systems: the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. Am. Nat. 138: 606-622.
34. Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54-70.
35. Iwasa, Y. 1990. Evolution of the selfing rate and resource allocation models. Plant Species Biol. 5:19-30.
36. Jarne, P., and J. R. Auld 2006. Animals mix it up too: the distribution of self-fertilization among hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 60:1816-1824.
37. Johnston, M. O. 1998. Evolution of intermediate selfing rates in plants: pollination ecology versus deleterious mutations. Genetica 102-103:267-278.
38. Johnston, M. O., E. Porcher, P.-O. Cheptou, C. G. Eckert, E. Elle, M. A. Geber, S. Kalisz, J. K. Kelly, D. A. Moeller, M. Vallejo-Marín, et al. 2009. Correlations among fertility components can maintain mixed mating in plants. Am. Nat. 173:1-11.
39. Jordan, C. Y., and L. D. Harder 2006. Manipulation of bee behavior by inflorescence architecture and its consequences for plant mating. Am. Nat. 167:496-509.
40. Kalisz, S., and E. M. Kramer 2007. Variation and constraint in plant evolution and development. Heredity 100:171-177.
41. Karron, J. D., R. T. Jackson, N. N. Thumser, and S. L. Schlicht 1997. Outcrossing rates of individual Mimulus ringens genets are correlated with anther-stigma separation. Heredity 79:365-370.
42. Kohn, J. R., and S. C. H. Barrett 1994. Pollen discounting and the spread of a selfing variant in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata: evidence from experimental populations. Evolution 48:1576-1594.
43. Lambrecht, S., and T. Dawson 2007. Correlated variation of floral and leaf traits along a moisture availability gradient. Oecologia 151:574-583.
44. Lande, R., and T. Price 1989. Genetic correlations and maternal effect coefficients obtained from offspring-parent regression. Genetics 122:915-922.
45. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40.
46. Lande, R., D. W. Schemske, and S. T. Schultz 1994. High inbreeding depression, selective interference among loci, and the threshold selfing rate for purging recessive lethal mutations. Evolution 48:965-978.
47. Lloyd, D. G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am. Nat. 113:67-79.
48. Lloyd, D. G. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self- fertilization. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153:370-380.
49. Lloyd, D. G., and D. J. Schoen 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153:358.
50. Mazer, S. J., H. Paz, and M. D. Bell 2004. Life history, floral development, and mating system in Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae): do floral and whole-plant rates of development evolve independently? Am. J. Bot. 91:2041-2050.
51. Mojica, J. P., and J. K. Kelly 2010. Viability selection prior to trait expression is an essential component of natural selection. Proc. R. Soc Lond. B. 277:2945-2950.
52. Morgan, M. T., and W. G. Wilson 2005. Self-fertilization and the escape from pollen limitation in variable pollination environments. Evolution 59:1143-1148.
53. Morgan, M. T., W. G. Wilson, and T. M. Knight 2005. Plant population dynamics, pollinator foraging, and the selection of self-fertilization. Am. Nat. 166:169-183.
54. Porcher, E., and R. Lande 2005a. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression under pollen discounting and pollen limitation. J. Evol. Biol. 18:497-508.
55. Porcher, E., and R. Lande 2005b. Reproductive compensation in the evolution of plant mating systems. New Phytol. 166:673-684.
56. Rausher, M. D., and S. Chang 1999. Stabilization of mixed mating systems by differences in the magnitude of inbreeding depression for male and female fitness components. Am. Nat. 154:242-248.
57. Ritland, K.. 1991. A genetic approach to measuring pollen discounting in natural plant populations. Am. Nat. 138:1049-1057.
58. Ronce, O., F. H. Shaw, F. Rousset, and R. G. Shaw 2009. Is inbreeding depression lower in maladapted populations? A quantitative genetics model. Evolution 63:1807-1819.
59. Runions, C. J., and M. A. Geber 2000. Evolution of the self-pollinating flower in Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae). I. Size and development of floral organs. Am. J. Bot. 87:1439-1451.
60. Sakai, S.. 1995. Evolutionarily stable selfing rates of hermaphroditic plants in competing and delayed selfing modes with allocation to attractive structures. Evolution 49:557-564.
61. Schemske, D. W., and R. Lande 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39: 41-52.
62. Schoen, D. J., and A. H. D. Brown 1991. Whole- and part-flower self-pollination in Glycine clandestina and G. argyrea and the evolution of autogamy. Evolution 45:1651-1664.
63. Schoen, D. J., and D. G. Lloyd 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. III. Methods for studying modes and functional aspects of self-fertilization. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153:381-393.
64. Schoen, D. J., M. T. Morgan, and T. Bataillon 1996. How does self-pollination evolve? Inferences from floral ecology and molecular genetic variation. Philos. Trans. 351:1281-1290.
65. Snell, R., and L. Aarssen 2005. Life history traits in selfing versus outcrossing annuals: exploring the 'time-limitation' hypothesis for the fitness benefit of self-pollination. BMC Ecol. 5:2.
66. Stebbins, G. L.. 1974. Flowering plants: evolution above the species level. Belknap, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA
67. Steets, J. A., D. E. Wolf, J. R. Auld, and T.-L. Ashman 2007. The role of natural enemies in the expression and evolution of mixed mating in hermaphroditic plants and animals. Evolution 61:2043-2055.
68. Strauss, S. Y. 1997. Floral characters link herbivores, pollinators, and plant fitness. Ecology 78:1640-1645.
69. Strauss, S. Y., D. H. Siemens, M. B. Decher, and T. Mitchell-Olds 1999. Ecological costs of plant resistance to herbivores in the currency of pollination. Evolution 53:1105-1113.
70. Strauss, S. Y., and J. B. Whittall 2006. Non-pollinator agents of selection on floral traits. Pp. 120-138 in L. D. Harder and S. C. H. Barrett, eds. Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford Univ. Press, New York
71. Uyenoyama, M. K. 1986. Inbreeding and the cost of meiosis: the evolution of selfing in populations practicing biparental inbreeding. Evolution 40:388-404.
72. Uyenoyama, M. K., K. E. Holsinger, and D. M. Waller 1993. Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 9:327-381.
73. Vallejo-Marín, M., and S. C. H. Barrett 2009. Modification of flower architecture during early stages in the evolution of self-fertilization. Ann. Bot. 103:951-962.
74. Wells, H.. 1979. Self-fertilization: advantageous or deleterious? Evolution 33:252-255.
75. Worley, A. C., and S. C. Barrett 2000. Evolution of floral display in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): direct and correlated responses to selection on flower size and number. Evolution 54:1533-1545.
76. Yahara, T. 1992. Graphical analysis of mating system evolution in plants. Evolution 46:557-561.
77. Yang, J. Y., and S. A. Hodges 2010. Early inbreeding depression selects for high outcrossing rates in Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens. Int. J. Plant Sci. 171:860-871.