Susceptibility assessment of earthquake-induced landslides using Bayesian network: A case study in Beichuan, China

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 42, Issue , 2012, Pages 189-199

  Song, Yiquan ^a,b   Gong, Jianhua ^a   Gao, Sheng ^c   Wang, Dongchuan ^d   Cui, Tiejun ^b   Li, Yi ^a   Wei, Baoquan ^e  

^a INSTITUTE OF REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS   (China)

^b TIANJIN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Department of Natural Resources   (Canada)

^d TIANJIN INSTITUTE OF URBAN CONSTRUCTION   (China)

^e NATIONAL MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING CENTER   (China)

Author keywords

Bayesian network; Landslide; Susceptibility assessment; Wenchuan earthquake

Indexed keywords

10-FOLD CROSS-VALIDATION; A-POSTERIORI PROBABILITIES; HIGH PROBABILITY; HIGHLY SENSITIVE; HYBRID METHOD; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; KEY TECHNIQUES; LANDSLIDE DETECTION; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAJOR FACTORS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; STUDY AREAS; WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; EARTHQUAKES; LITHOLOGY; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RATING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

LANDSLIDES;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; DATA ACQUISITION; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; LANDSLIDE; MODEL VALIDATION; PROBABILITY; SICHUAN EARTHQUAKE 2008;

BEICHUAN; CHINA; SICHUAN;

ANAS;

EID: 84859438995     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aguilera P., Fernández A., Reche F., Rumí R. Hybrid Bayesian network classifiers: application to species distribution models. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010, 25:1630-1639.
2. Aguilera, P.A., Fernández, A., Fernández, R., Rumí, R., Salmerón, A. Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, In press. http://10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.06.004.
3. Alpaydin E. Introduction to Machine Learning 2010, The MIT Press. 2nd ed.
4. Arias A. A measure of earthquake intensity. Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants 1970, 438-489. MIT Press, Cambridge. R.J.E. Hansen (Ed.).
5. Ayalew L., Yamagishi H. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 2005, 65:15-31.
6. Carrara A. Multivariate models for landslide hazard evaluation. Mathematical Geology 1983, 15:403-426.
7. Chung C.-J. Using likelihood ratio functions for modeling the conditional probability of occurrence of future landslides for risk assessment. Computers & Geosciences 2006, 32:1052-1068.
8. Cooper G.F., Herskovits E. A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Machine Learning 1992, 9:309-347.
9. Dempster A.P., Laird N.M., Rubin D.B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 1977, 39:1-38.
10. Dougherty, J., Kohavi, R., Sahami, M., 1995. Supervised and unsupervised discretization of continuous features. In: Prieditis, A., Russell, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning, Tahoe City, California, USA, pp. 194-202.
11. Fayyad, Irani, 1993. Multi-interval discretization of continuous-valued attributes for classification learning. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Uncertainty in AI, pp. 1022-1027.
12. Fell R. Landslide risk assessment and acceptable risk. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 1994, 31:261-272.
13. Guzzetti F., Carrara A., Cardinali M., Reichenbach P. Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study. Central Italy. Geomorphology 1999, 31:181-216.
14. Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982, 143:29-36.
15. Harp E.L., Wilson R.C. Shaking intensity thresholds for rock falls and slides: evidence from 1987 Whittier Narrows and superstition hills earthquake strong-motion records. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1995, 85:1739-1757.
16. Hirano A., Welch R., Lang H. Mapping from ASTER stereo image data: DEM validation and accuracy assessment. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2003, 57:356-370.
17. Jensen F.V. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs 2001, Springer-Verlag Inc., New York.
18. Jibson R.W. Predicting earthquake-induced landslide displacements using Newmark's sliding block analysis. Transportation Research Record 1993, 9-17.
19. Jibson R.W., Harp E.L., Michael J.A. A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps. Engineering Geology 2000, 58:271-289.
20. Keefer D. Landslides caused by earthquakes. Geological Society of America Bulletin 1984, 95:406-421.
21. Lauritzen S.L., Spiegelhalter D.J. Local Computations with Probabilities on Graphical Structures and Their Application to Expert Systems, Readings in Uncertain Reasoning 1990, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., (pp. 415-448).
22. Lee C., Huang C., Lee J., Pan K., Lin M., Dong J. Statistical approach to earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility. Engineering Geology 2008, 100:43-58.
23. Marcot B.G., Steventon J.D., Sutherland G.D., McCann R.K. Guidelines for developing and updating Bayesian belief networks applied to ecological modeling and conservation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2006, 36:3063-3074.
24. Murphy K. The Bayes Net Toolbox for MATLAB. Computing Science and Statistics 2001, 33:1024-1034.
25. Newmark N.M. Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique 1965, 15:139-159.
26. Nilaweera N.S., Nutalaya P. Role of tree roots in slope stabilisation. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 1999, 57:337-342.
27. Pearl J. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference 2000, Cambridge University Press.
28. Quinlan J.R. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning 1993, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
29. Regmi N.R., Giardino J.R., Vitek J.D. Assessing susceptibility to landslides: using models to understand observed changes in slopes. Geomorphology 2010, 122:25-38.
30. Regmi N.R., Giardino J.R., Vitek J.D. Modeling susceptibility to landslides using the weight of evidence approach: Western Colorado, USA. Geomorphology 2010, 115:172-187.
31. Russell S.J., Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach 2003, Pearson Education. 2nd ed.
32. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 1978, 6:461-464.
33. Stone M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 1974, 111-147.
34. Uusitalo L. Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Ecological Modelling 2007, 203:312-318.
35. van Westen C.J., Castellanos E., Kuriakose S.L. Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: an overview. Engineering Geology 2008, 102:112-131.
36. van Westen C.J., Rengers N., Terlien M.T.J., Soeters R. Prediction of the occurrence of slope instability phenomenal through GIS-based hazard zonation. Geologische Rundschau 1997, 86:404-414.
37. van Westen C.J., van Asch T.W.J., Soeters R. Landslide hazard and risk zonation-why is it still so difficult?. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 2006, 65:167-184.
38. Wang X., Nie G., Wang D. Relationships between ground motion parameters and landslides induced by Wenchuan earthquake. Earthquake Science 2010, 23:233-242.
39. Witten I.H., Frank E. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques 2011, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
40. Yilmaz I. Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey). Computers & Geosciences 2009, 35:1125-1138.
41. Yin Y., Wang F., Sun P. Landslide hazards triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan, China. Landslides 2009, 6:139-152.