The effect of sutureless wound closure on postoperative pain and swelling after impacted mandibular third molar surgery

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 256-258

  Hashemi, Hamid Mahmood ^a   Beshkar, Majid ^b   Aghajani, Reihaneh ^c  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Pain; Surgical wound; Swelling; Third molar

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; AMOXICILLIN; CHLORHEXIDINE; LIDOCAINE; PARACETAMOL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOLAR TOOTH; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE; SUTURELESS WOUND CLOSURE; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WOUND CLOSURE; WOUND HEALING;

EDEMA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MOLAR, THIRD; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PERIODONTAL POCKET; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; SURGICAL FLAPS; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH, IMPACTED; WOUND CLOSURE TECHNIQUES; WOUND HEALING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859438029     PISSN: 02664356     EISSN: 15321940     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.04.075     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Eming SA, KriegT,Davidson JM. Inflammation inwound repair: molecular and cellular mechanisms. J Invest Dermatol 2007;127:514-25.
2. Danda AK, Krishna Tatiparth M, Narayanan V, Siddareddi A. Influence of primary and secondary closure of surgical wound after impacted mandibular third molar removal on postoperative pain and swelling-a comparative and split mouth study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:309-12.
3. Waite PD, Cherala S. Surgical outcomes for suture-less surgery in 366 impacted third molar patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:669-73.
4. Dubois DD, Pizer ME, Chinnis RJ. Comparison of primary and secondary closure techniques after removal of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1982;40:631-4. (Pubitemid 13186586)
5. Pasqualini D, Cocero N, Castella A, Mela L, Bracco P. Primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34:52-7. (Pubitemid 40089730)
6. Cerqueira PR, Vasconcelos BC, Bessa-Nogueira RV. Comparative study of the effect of a tube drain in impacted lower third molar surgery.JOral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:57-61. (Pubitemid 38056131)
7. Saglam AA. Effects of tube drain with primary closure technique on postoperative trismus and swelling after removal of fully impacted mandibular third molars. Quintessence Int 2003;34:143-7. (Pubitemid 37158096)
8. Chukwuneke FN, Oji C, Saheeb DB. A comparative study of the effect of using a rubber drain on postoperative discomfort following lower third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:341-4. (Pubitemid 351446100)
9. Rakprasitkul S, Pairuchvej V. Mandibular third molar surgery with primary closure and tube drain. Int JOral Maxillofac Surg 1997;26:187-90.
10. de Brabander EC, Cattaneo G. The effect of surgical drain together with a secondary closure technique on postoperative trismus, swelling and pain after mandibular third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;17:119-21.