Decrement of cellulose recalcitrance by treatment with ionic liquid (1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate) as a strategy to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 87, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 629-634

  Xiros, Charilaos ^a   Vafiadi, Christina ^a   Topakas, Evangelos ^a   Christakopoulos, Paul ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Biocatalysis; Biofuel; Biomass; Mathematical modelling; Pre treatment

Indexed keywords

BIOCATALYSIS; BIOCONVERSION PROCESS; BIOCONVERSION YIELDS; BIOPROCESSES; CELLULOSE CRYSTALLINITY; CRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; ENZYMATIC DEGRADATION; FUSARIUM OXYSPORUMS; GLUCOSE PRODUCTION; HIGH CONVERSIONS; HIGH CRYSTALLINITY; HYDROLYSIS RATE; IN-SITU; LIQUID TREATMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELLING; MOLECULAR SOLVENTS; PRE-TREATMENT; SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION AND FERMENTATION; STRUCTURAL CHANGE;

BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; CELLULOSE; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; GLUCOSE; RATE CONSTANTS; SUBSTRATES; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS;

IONIC LIQUIDS;

1 ETHYL 3 METHYLIMIDAZOLIUM ACETATE; 1 METHYLIMIDAZOLE; CELLULOSE; GLUCOSE; IONIC LIQUID; POLYMER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BIOTRANSFORMATION; CHEMICAL REACTION; CRYSTALLIZATION; FUSARIUM OXYSPORUM; HYDROLYSIS; NONHUMAN; REACTION ANALYSIS; SOLVATION;

FUSARIUM OXYSPORUM;

EID: 84859434895     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2756     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Himmel ME, Ding S-Y, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW et al, Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315: 804-807 (2007).
2. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink H-P and Bohn A, Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed 44: 3358-3393 (2005).
3. Zhang Y-HP and Lynd LR, Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 88: 797-824 (2004).
4. Harris PV, Welner D, McFarland KC, Re E, Navarro Poulsen JC, Brown K, et al, and Lo Leggio L, Stimulation of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis by proteins of glycoside hydrolase family 61: structure and function of a large, enigmatic family. Biochemistry 49: 3305-3316 (2010).
5. Xiros C, Katapodis P and Christakopoulos P, Evaluation of Fusarium oxysporum cellulolytic system for an efficient hydrolysis of hydrothermally treated wheat straw. Bioresource Technol 100: 5362-5365 (2009).
6. Xiros C, Katapodis P and Christakopoulos P, Factors affecting cellulose and hemicellulose hydrolysis of alkali treated brewers spent grain by F. oxysporum enzyme extract. Bioresource Technol 102: 1688-1696 (2011).
7. Percival Zhang Y-H, Himmel ME and Mielenz JR, Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol Adv 24: 452-481 (2006).
8. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M et al, Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technol 96: 673-686 (2005).
9. El Seoud OA, Koschella A, Fidale LC, Dorn S and Heinze T, Applications of ionic liquids in carbohydrate chemistry: a window of opportunities. Biomacromolecules 8: 2629-2647 (2007).
10. Feng L and Chen Z-l, Research progress on dissolution and functional modification of cellulose in ionic liquids. J Mol Liq 142: 1-5 (2008).
11. Jastorff B, Störmann R, Ranke J, Mölter K, Stock F, Oberheitmann B, et al, and Filser J, How hazardous are ionic liquids? Structure-activity relationships and biological testing as important elements for sustainability evaluation. Green Chem 5: 136-142 (2003).
12. Zhao H, Jones CL, Baker GA, Xia S, Olubajo O and Person VN, Regenerating cellulose from ionic liquids for an accelerated enzymatic hydrolysis. J Biotechnol 139: 47-54 (2009).
13. Heinze T, Schwikal K and Barthel S, Ionic liquids as reaction medium in cellulose functionalization. Macromol Biosci 5: 520-525 (2005).
14. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE Jr and Conrad CM, An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the x-ray diffractometer. Tex Res J 29: 786-794 (1962).
15. Desai SG and Converse AO, Substrate reactivity as a function of the extent of reaction in the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 56: 650-655 (1997).
16. Thygesen A, Oddershede J, Lilholt H, Thomsen AB and Ståhl K, On the determination of crystallinity and cellulose content in plant fibres. Cellulose 12: 563-576 (2005).
17. Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA and Johnson DK, Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3: 10 (2010).
18. Jørgensen H, Vibe-Pedersen J, Larsen J and Felby C, Liquefaction of lignocellulose at high-solids concentrations. Biotechnol Bioeng 96: 862-870 (2006).
19. Dadi AP, Schall CA and Varanasi S, Mitigation of cellulose recalcitrance to enzymatic hydrolysis by ionic liquid pretreatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 137-140: 407-421 (2007).
20. Drissen RET, Maas RHW, van der Maarel MJEC, Kabel MA, Schols HA, Tramper J et al, A generic model for glucose production from various cellulose sources by a commercial cellulase complex. Biocatal Biotransform 25: 419-429 (2007).
21. Jørgensen H, Kristensen JB and Felby C, Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 1: 119-134 (2007).