Identifying the global core-periphery structure of science

Scientometrics

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 601-615

  Zelnio, Ryan ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Core periphery structure; Global science; Network centrality; Power law analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859432419     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0598-0     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Amaral, L. A. N., & Ottino, J. M. (2004). Complex networks: Augmenting the framework for the study of complex systems. European Physical Journal B, 38, 147-162.
2. Barabasi, A. L., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A, 311, 590-614.
3. Ben-David, J. (1971). The scientist's role in society. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1999). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21, 375-395.
5. Cioffi-Revilla, C. (Eds.). Power laws in the social sciences: Discovering complexity and non-equilibrium dynamics in the social universe. Publication forthcoming.
6. De Solla, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510-515.
7. Georghiou, L. (1998). Global cooperation in research. Research Policy, 27, 611-626.
8. Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69-115.
9. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistis in studies of S& T systems (pp. 257-276). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
10. Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., & Mayer, M. (2008). 'Triad' or 'tetrad'? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics, 74(1), 71-88.
11. Hill, C. T. (2007). The post-scientific society. Issues in Science and Technology, 24(1).
12. Holland, J. (1998). Emergence: From chaos to order. New York: Helix Books.
13. Hwang, K. (2008). International collaboration in multilayered center-periphery in the globalization of science and technology. Science Technology Human Values, 33, 101-133.
14. Jeong, H., Neda, A., & Barabasi, A. L. (2001). Measuring preferential attachment for evolving networks. arXiv: cond-mat/0104131 v1, 7 April 2001.
15. Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541-554.
16. King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 432.
17. Lall, S. (2001). Competitiveness indices and developing countries: An economic evaluation of the global competitiveness report. World Development, 29(9), 1501-1525.
18. Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 317-325.
19. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317-324.
20. Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 404-409.
21. Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Co-authorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(Suppl. 1), 5200-5205.
22. Ohmae, K. (1985). Triad Power: The Coming Shape of Global Competition. New York: Free Press.
23. Oldham, G. (2005). Policy brief: International scientific collaboration: a quick guide, science and development network.
24. Schott, T. (1993). World science: Globalization of institutions and participation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 18, 196-208.
25. Schott, T. (1998). Ties between center and periphery in the scientific world system. Journal of World-Systems Research, 4, 112-144.
26. Serrano, M. A. (2008). Rich-club vs. rich-multipolarization phenomena in weighted networks. Physical Review E, 78, 026101.
27. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Wagner, C. S. (2005). Six case studies of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics, 62(1), 3-26.
29. Wagner, C. S. (2008). The new invisible college: Science for development. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
30. Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608-1618.
31. Wagner-Döbler, R. (2001). Continuity and discontinuity of collaboration behaviour since 1800-from a bibliometric point of view. Scientometrics, 52, 503-517.
32. Zelnio, R. (2011). Structure of international scientific collaboration. In E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, J. Leta (Eds), Proceedings of ISSI 2011-the 13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Durban, South Africa (pp. 898-913).
33. Zhou, S., & Mondragón, R. J. (2004). The rich-club phenomenon in the internet topology. IEEE Communication Letters, 8(3), 180-181.