Influences of encoding and retrieval on the steady-state visual evoked potential

NeuroReport

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 337-341

  Martens, Ulla ^a   Gert, Anna L ^a   Gruber, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

encoding; human electroencephalogram; retrieval; steady state visual evoked potentia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COGNITION; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STEADY STATE VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL CORTEX;

ADULT; COGNITION; ELECTRODES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PATHWAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859424463     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: 1473558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283516542     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kaspar K, Hassler U, Martens U, Trujillo-Barreto N, Gruber T. Steady-state visually evoked potential correlates of object recognition. Brain Res 2010; 1343:112-121.
2. Keil A, Moratti S, Sabatinelli D, Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Additive effects of emotional content and spatial selective attention on electrocortical facilitation. Cereb Cortex 2005; 15:1187.
3. Müller MM, Andersen SK, Attar CH. Attentional bias to briefly presented emotional distractors follows a slow time course in visual cortex. J Neurosci 2011; 31:15914-15918.
4. Müller MM, Picton TW, Valdes-Sosa P, Riera J, Teder- Sälejärvi WA, Hillyard SA. Effects of spatial selective attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28Hz range. Cognit Brain Res 1998; 6:249-261. (Pubitemid 28247552)
5. Andersen SK, Fuchs S, Müller MM. Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing. J Cognit Neurosci 2011; 23:238-246.
6. Sutoyo D, Srinivasan R. Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional 'eye' rivalry and interocular 'percept' rivalry. Brain Res 2009; 1251:245-255.
7. Müller MM, Malinowski P, Gruber T, Hillyard SA. Sustained division of the attentional spotlight. Nature 2003; 424:309-312. (Pubitemid 36899371)
8. Martens U, Trujillo Barreto N, Gruber T. Perceiving the tree in the woods: segregating brain responses to stimuli constituting natural scenes. J Neurosci 2011; 31:17713-17718.
9. Silberstein RB, Nunez PL, Pipingas A, Harris P, Danieli F. Steady state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) topography in a graded working memory task. Int J Psychophysiol 2001; 42:219-232. (Pubitemid 32928386)
10. Perlstein WM, Cole MA, Larson M, Kelly K, Seignourel P, Keil A. Steadystate visual evoked potentials reveal frontally-mediated working memory activity in humans. Neurosci Lett 2003; 342:191-195. (Pubitemid 36570350)
11. Vialatte F-B, Maurice M, Dauwels J, Cichocki A. Steady-state visually evoked potentials: focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives. Prog Neurobiol 2010; 90:418-438.
12. Green DM, Swets JA. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley; 1966.
13. Friedman D. Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: a selective review. Microsc Res Tech 2000; 51:6-28.
14. Otten LJ, Rugg MD. Electrophysiological correlates of memory encoding are task-dependent. Cognit Brain Res 2001; 12:11-18. (Pubitemid 32728276)
15. Wagner AD, Schacter DL, Rotte M, Koutstaal W, Maril A, Dale AM, et al. Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. Science 1998; 281:188-191.
16. Otten LJ, Henson RNA, Rugg MD. Depth of processing effects on neural correlates of memory encoding. Brain 2001; 124:399.
17. Otten LJ, Rugg MD. When more means less: neural activity related to unsuccessful memory encoding. Curr Biol 2001; 11:1528-1530. (Pubitemid 32931015)
18. Rugg MD, Curran T. Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends Cognit Sci 2007; 11:251-257. (Pubitemid 46809560)
19. Woollams AM, Taylor JR, Karayanidis F, Henson RN. Event-related potentials associated with masked priming of test cues reveal multiple potential contributions to recognition memory. J Cognit Neurosci 2008; 20: 1114-1129. (Pubitemid 351758665)
20. Konishi S, Wheeler ME, Donaldson DI, Buckner RL. Neural correlates of episodic retrieval success. Neuroimage 2000; 12:276-286.
21. Wiggs CL, Martin A. Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1998; 8:227-233. (Pubitemid 28247804)