Wildlife forensics. Genomics has become a powerful tool to inform conservation measures

EMBO Reports

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 308-312

  Wolinsky, Howard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL HUNTING; ARGENTINA; ARTICLE; BEAR; CYTOMEGALOVIRUS; DNA BARCODING; DNA DETERMINATION; DOG; DOLPHIN; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FORENSIC GENETICS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HUMPBACK WHALE; LANDSCAPE; LYMPHOCRYPTOVIRUS; MADAGASCAR; NONHUMAN; NORWAY; POLAR BEAR; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANDINAVIA; SHEEP; SIMIAN FOAMY VIRUS; SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE; TURTLE; WILDLIFE; WILDLIFE CONSERVATION; WOLF;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, WILD; AQUATIC ORGANISMS; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; FORENSIC GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMANS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84859419851     PISSN: 1469221X     EISSN: 14693178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/embor.2012.35     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Rosenbaum H et al (2009) Population structure of humpback whales from their breeding grounds in the south Atlantic and Indian oceans. PLoS ONE 4: e7318. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007318
2. Alacs EA, Georges A, FitzSimmons NN, Robertson J (2010) DNA detective: a review of molecular approaches to wildlife forensics. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 6: 180-194
3. Smith KM et al (2012) Zoonotic viruses associated with illegally imported wildlife products. PLoS ONE 7: e29505. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029505