Homophily, selection, and influence in a longitudinal study of drugs in school population;Homofilia, selección e influencia en un estudio longitudinal de drogas en población escolar

Psykhe

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 101-114

  Valenzuela, Eduardo ^a   Ayala, Cristián ^a  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Adolescence; Drugs; Peer effect

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859373680     PISSN: 07170297     EISSN: 07182228     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4067/S0718-22282011000200009     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aguirre, E. (2010). Amistad y homogeneidad de pares en conductas de riesgo en niños de séptimo básico de la Región Metropolitana (Tesis de habilitación profesional no publicada), Instituto de Sociología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
2. Akers, J. F., Jones, R. M. & Coyl, D. D. (1998). Adolescent friendship pairs: Similarities in identity status development, behaviors, attitudes, and intentions. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13, 178-201. doi:10.1177/07435548981320 05
3. Aseltine Jr., R. H. (1995). A reconsideration of parental and peer influences on adolescent deviance. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 103-121.
4. Bauman, K. E. & Ennett, S. T. (1996). On the importance of peer influence for adolescent drug use: Commonly neglected considerations. Addiction, 91, 185-198. doi:0965-2140/96/020185-14
5. Bauman, K. E. & Fisher, L. A. (1986). On the measurement of the friend behavior in research on friend influence and selection: Findings from longitudinal studies of adolescent smoking and drinking. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 15, 345-353. doi:10.1007/BF02145731
6. Berscheid, E. & Walster E. H. (1985). Interpersonal attraction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7. Blanton, H. & Burkley, M. (2008). Deviance regulation theory: Applications to adolescent social influence. En M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 94-124). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
8. Brechwald, W. A. & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 166-179. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x
9. Burk, W. J., Kerr, M. & Stattin, H. (2008). The co-evolution of early adolescent friendship networks, school involvement, and delinquent behaviors. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49, 499-522.
10. Cohen, G. L. & Prinstein, M. J. (2006). Peer contagion of aggression and health risk behavior among adolescent males: An experimental investigation on affects on public conduct and private attitudes. Child Development, 77, 967-983. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00913.x
11. Denscombe, M. (2001). Peer group pressure, young people and smoking: New developments and policy implications. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 8, 7-32.
12. DeVries, H., Candel, M., Engels, R. & Mercken, L. (2006). Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: Results for 12-13 year olds from six European countries from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach Study. Tobacco Control, 15, 83-89. doi:10.1136/tc.2003.007237
13. De Vries, H., Engels, R., Kremers, S., Wetzels, J. & Mudde, A. (2003). Parents' and friends' smoking status as predictors of smoking onset: Findings from six European countries. Health Education Research, 18, 627-636. doi:10.1093/ her/cyg032
14. Ennett, S. T. & Bauman, K. E. (1994). The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: The case of adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 653-663.
15. Gaughan, M. (2006). The gender structure of adolescent peer influence on drinking. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47, 47-61. doi:10.1177/002214650604700104
16. Haselager, G. J. T., Hartup, W. W., van Lieshout, C. F. M. & Riksen-Walraven, J. M. A. (1998). Similarities between friends and nonfriends in middle childhood. Child Development, 69, 1198-1208. doi:0009-3920/98/6904-0004
17. Kandel, D. B. (1978a). Similarity in real-life adolescent friendship pairs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 306-312. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.3.306
18. Kandel, D. B. (1978b). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427-436.
19. Kandel, D. B. (1996). The parental and peer contexts of adolescent deviance: An algebra of interpersonal influences. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 289-315.
20. Kandel, D., Davies, M. & Baydar, N. (1990). The creation of interpersonal contexts: Homophily in dyadic relationships in adolescence and young adulthood. En L. Robins & M. Rutter, Straight and devious pathways from childhood to adulthood (pp. 221-241). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21. Kobus, K. (2003). Peers and adolescent smoking. Addiction, 98(Suppl. s1), 37-55. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.98.s1.4.x
22. Kupersmidt, J. B., DeRosier, M. E. & Patterson, C. P. (1995). Similarity as the basis for children's friendships: The roles of sociometric status, aggressive and withdrawn behavior, academic achievement and demographic characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 439-452. doi:10.1177/0265407595123007
23. Leenders, R. T. A. (1996). Evolution of friendship and best friendship choices. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21, 133-148. doi:10.1080/0022250X.1996.9990177
24. McIntosh, J., MacDonald, F. & McKeganey, N. (2006). Why do children experiment with illegal drugs? The declining role of peer pressure with increasing age. Addiction Research & Theory, 14, 275-287. doi:10.1080/160663505003 30465
25. Mercken, L., Candel, M., Willems, P. & De Vries, H. (2007). Disentangling social selection and social influence effects on adolescent smoking: The importance of reciprocity in friendships. Addiction, 102, 1483-1492. doi:10.1111/ j.1360-0443.2007.01905.x
26. Pilgrim, C., Luo, Q., Urberg, K. A. & Fang, X. (1999). Influence of peers, parents, and individual characteristics on adolescent drug use in two cultures. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 85-107.
27. Poulin, F., Kiesner, J., Pedersen, S. & Dishion, T. J. (2010). A short-term longitudinal analysis of friendship selection on early adolescent substance use. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 249-256. doi:10.1016j.2010.05.006
28. Prinstein, M. J. & Dodge, K. A. (2008). Current issues in peer influence research. En M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 3-16). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
29. Simons-Morton, B. G. & Farhat, T. (2010). Recent findings on peer group influences on adolescent smoking. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 31,191-208. doi:10.1007/s10935-010-0220-x
30. Tolson, J. M. & Urberg, K. A. (1993). Similarity between adolescent best friends. Journal of Adolescent Research, 8, 274-288. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.4.540
31. Urberg, K. A., Degirmencioglu, S. M. & Pilgrim, C. (1997). Close friend and group influence on adolescent cigarette smoking and alcohol use. Developmental Psychology, 33, 834-844. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.5.834
32. Urberg, K. A., Degirmencioglu, S. M. & Tolson, J. M. (1998). Adolescent friendship selection and termination: The role of similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 703-710. doi:10.1177/0265407598155008
33. Urberg, K. A., Luo, Q., Pilgrim, C. & Degirmencioglu, S. M. (2003). A two-stage model of peer influence in adolescent substance use: Individual and relationship-specific differences in susceptibility to influence. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 1243-1256. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00256-3
34. Weerman, F. M. (2011). Delinquent peers in context: A longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence effects. Criminology, 49, 253-286. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00223.x
35. Weerman, F. M. & Smeenk, W. H. (2005). Peer similarity in delinquency for different types of friends: A comparison using two measurement methods. Criminology, 43, 499-524. doi:10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00015.x