Effects of disodium fumarate on ruminal fermentation and microbial communities in sheep fed on high-forage diets

Animal

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 815-823

  Zhou, Y W ^a   McSweeney, C S ^b   Wang, J K ^a   Liu, J X ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

disodium fumarate; microbial community; ruminal metabolism; sheep

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; BUTYRIC ACID DERIVATIVE; FUMARIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RIBOSOME DNA;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL FOOD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DIET; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; DRUG EFFECT; FERMENTATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METAGENOME; MICROBIOLOGY; PH; PHYSIOLOGY; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RUMINANT STOMACH; SHEEP; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ACETATES; ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; BUTYRATES; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DIET; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; FERMENTATION; FUMARATES; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; METAGENOME; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RUMEN; SHEEP; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BUTYRIVIBRIO FIBRISOLVENS; CLOSTRIDIUM SP.; FIBROBACTER SUCCINOGENES; FUNGI; OVIS ARIES; PREVOTELLA; PREVOTELLA RUMINICOLA; PROTOZOA; RUMINOCOCCUS ALBUS; RUMINOCOCCUS FLAVEFACIENS; RUMINOCOCCUS SP.; SELENOMONAS DIANAE;

EID: 84859362321     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731111002102     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Arakaki LC, Gaggiotti MC, Cannillia ML, Valtorta S, Gallardo MR, Conti RG, Gregoret F, Quaino O, Kudo H and Takenaka A 2005. Evaluation of soybean silage in dairy cows under grazing conditions in Argentina: effects on rumen microorganisms. Proceedings of Japanese Society for Rumen Metabolism and Physiology 16, 87.
2. Asanuma N and Hino T 2000. Activity and properties of fumarate reductase in ruminal bacteria. The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology 46, 119-125.
3. Asanuma N, Iwamoto M and Hino T 1999a. The production of formate, a substrate for methanogenesis, from compounds related with the glyoxylate cycle by mixed ruminal microbes. Animal Science Journal 70, 67-73.
4. Asanuma N, Iwamoto M and Hino T 1999b. Effect of the addition of fumarate on methane production by ruminal microorganisms in vitro. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 780-787.
5. Carro MD and Ranilla MJ 2003. Influence of different concentrations of disodium fumarate on methane production and fermentation of concentrate feeds by rumen micro-organisms in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition 90, 617-623.
6. Castillo C, Benedito JL, Méndez J, Pereira V, López-Alonso M, Miranda M and Hernández J 2004. Organic acids as a substitute for monensin in diets for beef cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 115, 101-116.
7. Chen XL, Wang JK, Wu YM and Liu JX 2007. Effect of form of nitrogen on populations of fibre-associated ruminal microbes in pre-treated rice straw in vitro. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 16, 95-100.
8. Chen XL, Wang JK, Wu YM and Liu JX 2008. Effects of chemical treatments of rice straw on rumen fermentation characteristics, fibrolytic enzyme activities and populations of liquid-and solid-associated ruminal microbes in vitro. Animal Feed Science and Technology 141, 1-14.
9. Denman SE and McSweeney CS 2006. Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 58, 572-582.
10. Denman SE, Tomkins NW and McSweeney CS 2007. Quantitation and diversity analysis of ruminal methanogenic populations in response to the antimethanogenic compound bromochloromethane. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 62, 313-322.
11. Finlay BJ, Esteban G, Clarke KJ, Williams AG, Embley T and Hirt RP 1994. Some rumen ciliates have endosymbiotic methanogens. FEMS Microbiology Letters 117, 157-161.
12. Forsberg CW, Cheng KJ and White BA 1997. Polysaccharide degradation in the rumen and large intestine. In Gastrointestinal microbiology (ed. RI Mackie and BA White), pp. 319-379. Chapman and Hall, New York, USA.
13. García-Martínez R, Ranilla MJ, Tejido ML and Carro MD 2005. Effects of disodium fumarate onin vitrorumen microbial growth, methane production and fermentation of diets differing in their forage: concentrate ratio. British Journal of Nutrition 94, 71-77.
14. Hattori K and Matsui H 2008. Diversity of fumarate reducing bacteria in the bovine rumen revealed by culture dependent and independent approaches. Anaerobe 14, 87-93.
15. Henderson C 1980. The influence of extracellular hydrogen on the metabolism of Bacteroides ruminicola, Anaerovibrio lipolytica and Selenomonas ruminan-tium. Journal of General Microbiology 119, 485-491.
16. Hillman K, Lloyd D and Williams AG 1988. Interactions between the methanogen Methanosarcina barkeri and rumen holotrich ciliate protozoa. Letters in Applied Microbiology 7, 49-53.
17. Hu WL, Liu JX, Ye JA, Wu YM and Guo YQ 2005. Effect of tea saponin on rumen fermentation in vitro. Animal Feed Science and Technology 120, 333-339.
18. Hungate RE 1967. Hydrogen as an intermediate in the rumen fermentation. Archives of Microbiology 59, 158-164.
19. Ji YT, Qu CQ and Cao BY 2007. Optimized method of DNA silver staining in polyacylamide gels electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 28, 1173-1175.
20. Joblin KN, Naylor GE and Williams AG 1990. Effect of methanobrevibacter smithii on xylanolytic activity of anaerobic ruminal fungi. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56, 2287-2295.
21. Kocherginskaya SA, Cann IKO and Mackie RI 2005. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. In Methods in gut microbial ecology for ruminants (ed. HPS Makkar and CS McSweeney), pp. 119-128. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
22. Koike S and Kobayashi Y 2001. Development and use of competitive PCR assays for the rumen cellulolytic bacteria: Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus and Ruminococcusflavefaciens. FEMS Microbiology Letters 204, 361-366.
23. Krumholz LR, Forsberg CW and Veira DM 1983. Association of methanogenic bacteria with rumen protozoa. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 29, 676-680.
24. Makkar HPS and McSweeney CS 2005. Methods in gut microbial ecology for ruminants. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
25. Marvin-Sikkema FD, Richardson AJ, Stewart CS, Gottschal JC and Prins RA 1990. Influence of hydrogen-consuming bacteria on cellulose degradation by anaerobic fungi. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56, 3793-3797.
26. McAllister TA and Newbold CJ 2008. Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 7-13.
27. Ministry of Agriculture of China 2004. Feeding standard of meat-producing sheep and goats (NY/T 816-2004). China Agricultural Press, Beijing, China.
28. Morgavi DP, Forano E, Martin C and Newbold CJ 2010. Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Animal 4, 1024-1036.
29. Muyzer G, de Waal EC and Uitterlinden AG 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59, 695-700.
30. Pavlostathis SG, Miller TL and Wolin MJ 1990. Cellulose fermentation by continuous cultures of Ruminococcus albus and Methanobrevibacter smithii. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 33, 109-116.
31. Russell JB and Wallace RJ 1997. Energy-yielding and energy-consuming reactions. In The rumen microbial ecosystem, 2nd edition (ed. PN Hobson and CS Stewart), pp. 246-282. Blackie Academic and Professional, London, UK.
32. Searle LP 1984. The berthelot or indophenol reaction and its use in the analytical chemistry of nitrogen: a review. Analyst 109, 549-568.
33. SPSS 2006. SPSS Base 13.0 for Windows user's guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.
34. Stewart CS, Flint HJ and Bryant MP 1988. The rumen bacteria. In The rumen microbial ecosystem, 1st edition (ed. PN Hobson), pp. 21-75. Elsevier Applied Science, New York, USA.
35. Stumm CK, Gijzen HJ and Vogels GD 1982. Association of methanogenic bacteria with ovine rumen ciliates. British Journal of Nutrition 47, 95-99.
36. Ungerfeld EM and Kohn RA 2006. The role of thermodynamics in the control of ruminal fermentation. In Ruminant physiology. Digestion, metabolism and impact of nutrition on gene expression, immunology and stress (ed. K Sejrsen, T Hvelplund and MO Nielsen), pp. 55-85. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
37. Ungerfeld EM, Kohn RA, Wallace RJ and Newbold CJ 2007. A meta-analysis of fumarate effects on methane production in ruminal batch cultures. Journal of Animal Science 85, 2556-2563.
38. Ushida K and Jouany J 1996. Methane production associated with rumen-ciliated protozoa and its effect on protozoan activity. Letters in Applied Microbiology 23, 129-132.
39. Wallace RJ, Onodera R and Cotta MA 1997. Metabolism of nitrogen-containing compounds. In The rumen microbial ecosystem, 2nd edition (ed. PN Hobson and CS Stewart), pp. 283-328. Blackie Academic & Professiional, London, UK.
40. Williams AG and Coleman GS 1997. The rumen protozoa. In The rumen microbial ecosystem, 2nd edition (ed. PN Hobson and CS Stewart), pp. 73-139. Blackie Academic & Professiional, London, UK.
41. Williams AG, Withers SE and Joblin KN 1994. The effect of cocultivation with hydrogen-consuming bacteria on xylanolysis by Ruminococcusflavefaciens. Current Microbiology 29, 133-138.
42. Wolin MJ 1974. Metabolic interactions among intestinal microorganisms. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 27, 1320-1328.
43. Wolin MJ 1979. The rumen fermentation: a model for microbial interactions in anaerobic ecosystems. In Advances in microbial ecology (ed. M Alexander), Vol. 3 pp. 49-77. Plenum Press, New York.
44. Wolin M, Miller T and Stewart C 1997. Microbe-microbe interactions. In The rumen microbial ecosystem (ed. PN Hobson and CS Stewart), pp. 467-491. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK.
45. Wood TA, Wallace RJ, Rowe A, Price J, Yáñez-Ruiz DR, Murray P and Newbold CJ 2009. Encapsulated fumaric acid as a feed ingredient to decrease ruminal methane emissions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 152, 62-71.
46. Yu CW, Chen YS, Cheng YH, Cheng YS, Yang CMJ and Chang CT 2010. Effects of fumarate on ruminal ammonia accumulation and fiber digestion in vitro and nutrient utilization in dairy does. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 701-710.