Comparison of longitudinal unevenness of old and repaired highway lanes

Journal of Transportation Engineering

Volumn 138, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 371-380

  Múčka, Peter ^a   Granlund, Johan ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS AND MACHINE MECHANICS   (Slovakia)

^b Chief Technology Officer: Road Operation and Maintenance   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Highways and roads; Power spectral density; Surface roughness; Vibration; Wavelength

Indexed keywords

AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTIONS; COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; HIGH-SPEED; HIGHWAY LANES; HIGHWAYS AND ROADS; INTERNATIONAL ROUGHNESS INDEX; LONGITUDINAL ROAD PROFILE; PAPER DOCUMENTS; PAVING CONTRACTORS; POWER SPECTRAL DENSITIES (PSD); PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION (PDF); RIDE QUALITY; ROAD PROFILE; ROAD SURFACES; ROAD UNEVENNESS; ROAD USERS; VIBRATION; WEARING COURSE;

POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; WAVELENGTH;

ROADS AND STREETS;

AUTOCORRELATION; DENSITY; ELEVATION; MOTORWAY; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; ROAD; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; VIBRATION; WAVELENGTH;

EID: 84859332579     PISSN: 0733947X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000297     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ahlin K. Granlund N. O. J. Relating road roughness and vehicle speeds to human whole body vibration and exposure limits. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2002, 3(4):207-216. IJPEF7, 1029-8436, 10.1080/10298430210001701.
2. Andrén P. Power spectral density approximations of longitudinal road profiles. Int. J. Vehicle Des. 2006, 40(1/2/3):2-14. IJVDDW, 0143-3369, 10.1504/IJVD.2006.008450.
3. Standard practice for computing international roughness index of roads from longitudinal profile measurements. 2003, ASTM E1926-98, West Conshohocken, Pa.
4. Ayenu-Prah A.Y. Attoh-Okine N.O. Comparative study of Hilbert-Huang transform, Fourier transform and wavelet transform in pavement profile analysis. Vehicle Syst. Dyn. 2009, 47(4):437-456. VSDYA4, 0042-3114, 10.1080/00423110802167466.
5. Bendat J.S. Piersol A.G. Random data: Analysis and measurement procedures 2000, and Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.
6. Road and airfield surface characteristics. Test methods. Part 5. Determination of longitudinal unevenness indices. 2006, British Standards Institution (BSI), London BSEN 13036-5, Brussels.
7. Cebon D. Handbook of Vehicle-Road Interaction 1999, Swets and Zeitlinger B.V., Lisse, The Netherlands.
8. Measurement and evaluation of the road surface unevenness. 2009, Czech Normalization Institute CSN 736175, Prague, Czech republic.
9. 2008 Status of the nation's highways, bridges, and transit: conditions and performance. 2008, Federal Highway Administration, (November 2010).
10. Heath A.N. Application of the isotropic road roughness assumption. J. Sound Vib. 1987, 115(1):131-144. JSVIAG, 0022-460X, 10.1016/0022-460X(87)90495-0.
11. Mechanical vibration-road surface profiles-reporting of measured data. 1995, International Standards Organization ISO 8608, Geneva, Switzerland.
12. Characterization of pavement texture by use of surface profiles-Part 1: Determination of mean profile depth. 1997, ISO, (a). ISO 13473-1, Geneva, Switzerland.
13. Mechanical vibration and shock-evaluation of human response to whole-body vibration. Part I: General requirements. 1997, ISO, (b). ISO 2631-1, Geneva, Switzerland.
14. Mechanical vibration and shock-range of idealized values to characterize seated-body biodynamic response under vertical vibration. 2001, ISO ISO 5982, Geneva, Switzerland.
15. Kropáč O. Múčka P. Relations between characteristics of longitudinal unevenness of roads: review. Strojnícky Časopis 2003, 54(1&3):49-64 & 188-194
16. Kropáč O. Múčka P. Indicators of longitudinal unevenness of roads in the USA. Int. J. Vehicle Des. 2008, 46(4):393-415. IJVDDW, 0143-3369, 10.1504/IJVD.2008.020306.
17. Kropáč O. Múčka P. Non-uniqueness of single-number indicators of longitudinal road profile. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2009, 10(4):747-766. 1468-0629, 10.3166/rmpd.10.747-766.
18. Kropáč O. Múčka P. Specification of obstacles in the longitudinal road profile by median filtering. J. Transp. Eng. 2011, 137(3):214-226. JTPEDI, 0733-947X, 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000209.
19. Loizos A. Plati C. An alternative approach to pavement roughness evaluation. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2008, 9(1):69-78. IJPEF7, 1029-8436, 10.1080/10298430600949894.
20. Mitschke M. Wallentowitz H. Dynamik der Kraftfahrzeuge 2004, and 4th Ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
21. Praticò F. Nonstrictly-Ergodic signals in road roughness analyses: theoretical and experimental study. Proc. 2nd Int. Congress of the Società Italiana Infrastrutture Viarie (SIIV 2004) 2004 Univ. of Florence, Florence, Italy.
22. Sayers M.W. On the calculation of International Roughness Index from longitudinal road profile. 1995, 1-12. J. Trans. Res. Board, 1501
23. Sayers M.W. Karamihas S.M. Estimation of rideability by analyzing longitudinal road profile. 1996, 110-116. and J. Trans. Res. Board, 1536
24. Stein G. J. Múčka P. Theoretical investigation of linear planar model of passenger car with seated people. P. I. Mech. Eng. D-J Aut. 2003, 217(4):257-268. PMDEEA, 0954-4070, 10.1243/09544070360613228.
25. Sun L. Developing spectrum-based models for international roughness index and present serviceability index. J. Transp. Eng. 2001, 127(6):463-470. JTPEDI, 0733-947X, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:6(463).
26. Sun L. Zhang Z. Ruth J. Modeling indirect statistics of surface roughness. J. Transp. Eng. 2001, 127(2):105-111. JTPEDI, 0733-947X, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:2(105).
27. Willet M. Magnusson G. Ferne B.W. Filter experiment-Theoretical study of indices. 2000 FEHRL Tech. Note 2000/02, Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Bershire, UK.