Bayesian shared frailty models for regional inference about wildlife survival

Animal Conservation

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 127-128

  Heisey, D M ^a  

^a NATIONAL WILDLIFE HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859265976     PISSN: 13679430     EISSN: 14691795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00532.x     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. Bolker, B.M., Brooks, M.E., Clark, C.J., Geanger, S.W., Poulsen, J.R., Stevens, M.H.H. & White, J.S. (2008). Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 24, 127-135.
2. Efron, B. & Morris, C. (1977). Stein's paradox in statistics. Sci. Am. 236, 119-127.
3. Halstead, B.J., Wylie, G.D., Coates, P.S., Valcarcel, P. & Casazza, M.L. (2012). Bayesian shared frailty models for regional inference about wildlife survival. Anim. Conserv. 15, 117-124.
4. Hodges, J.S. & Reich, B.J. (2010). Adding spatially correlated errors can mess up the fixed effect you love. Am. Stat. 64, 325-334.
5. Lele, S.R. & Dennis, B. (2009). Bayesian methods for hierarchical models: are ecologists making a Faustian bargain? Ecol. Appl. 19, 581-584.
6. Paciorek, C.J. (2010). The importance of scale for spatial-confounding bias and precision of spatial regression estimators. Stat. Sci. 25, 107-125.
7. Ponciano, J.M., Taper, M.L., Dennis, B. & Lele, S.R. (2009). Hierarchical models in ecology: confidence intervals, hypothesis testing and model selection using data cloning. Ecology 90, 356-362.
8. Robinson, G.K. (1991). That BLUP is a good thing: the estimation of random effects. Stat. Sci. 6, 15-32.