The structuring of GMO release and evaluation in EU law

Biotechnology Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 569-581

  von Kries, Caroline ^a   Winter, Gerd ^b  

^a LLM ^*  (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biosafety; Genetically modified organisms; GMO regulation; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; COST; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUROPE; GENETIC ENGINEERING; HEALTH; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LAW; MORALITY; NONHUMAN; NOTE; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIOECONOMICS; STANDARDIZATION; TRANSGENIC ORGANISM;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; EUROPEAN UNION; HUMANS; ORGANISMS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84859263251     PISSN: 18606768     EISSN: 18607314     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/biot.201100321     Document Type: Note

References (13)

1. Morrow, K., Genetically modified organisms and risk, in: Bodiguel, L., Cardwell, M. (eds.), The regulation of genetically modified organisms: comparative approaches, Oxford University Press 2010, pp 54-76.
2. Charlier, C., Valschecini, E., The importance and limits of cost-benefit analysis in the regulation of genetically modified organisms, in: Bodiguel, L., Cardwell, M. (eds.), The regulation of genetically modified organisms: comparative approaches, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010, pp 37-5.
3. Spök, A., Assessing socio-economic impacts of GMOs, Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, Wien 2010. http://www.bmg.gv.at/cms/site/attachments/2/7/6/CH0808/CMS1287125505520/assessing_socio-economic_impacts_of_gmos, _band_2010.pdf, (visited 27.12.2010.
4. Winter, G., Nature protection and the introduction into the environment of genetically modified organisms: Risk analysis in EC multilevel governance. RECIEL, 2008, 17, 205-220.
5. Lee, M., Multi-level governance of genetically modified organisms in the European Union: Ambiguity and hierarchy, in: Bodiguel, L., Cardwell, M. (eds.), The regulation of genetically modified organisms: comparative approaches, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010, pp 101-122.
6. Dolezel, M., Miklau, M., Eckerstorfer, M., Hilbeck, A. et al., Standardising the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants in the EU, Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn, BfN-Skripten 259/ 2009.
7. Breckling, B., Dolek, M., Lang, A., Reuter, H., Verhoeven, R., Die ökologischen Organisationsebenen als Kriterium der Übersicht und Vollständigkeit im GVO Monitoring, in: Breckling, B. Dolek, M., Lang, A., Reuter, H., Verhoeven R. (eds.), GVO Monitoring vor der Umsetzung. Naturschutz und biologische Vielfalt 49/2007, pp 227-24.
8. OECD, Safety evaluation of foods derived by modern biotechnology. Concepts and principles, 1993.
9. Breckling, B., Naturwissenschaftliche Grundlagen der Gentechnik als Ausgangspunkt zur Risikoabschätzung gentechnisch veränderter Organismen, in: Umweltbundesamt (ed.) Fortschreibung des Konzepts zur Bewertung von Risiken bei Freisetzungen und dem Inverkehrbringen von GVO, Berichte 3/04, E. Schmidt Verlag Berlin 2004, pp 52-59.
10. Breckling, B. et al., A Modular Concept for the Step-by-Step-Principle, Final Report of the StepKo Project, commissioned by Bundesamt für Naturschutz (FKZ 350789050), Draft of June 2011, on file with authors, ch. 2.2.and 2.3.
11. Züghart, W., Raps, A., Wust-Saucy, A.-G., Dolezel, M., Eckerstorfer, M., Monitoring of genetically modified organisms, A policy paper representing the view of the National Environment Agencies in Austria and Switzerland and the Federal Agency for Nature Conservation in Germany, Environment Agency Austria, Report REP 0305, Vienna 2011.
12. US National Research Council, Risk assessment models: Environmental effects of transgenic plants - The scope and adequacy of regulation, National Academy Press, Washington DC, pp 93-100.
13. Hill, R. A. Conceptualizing risk assesment methodology for genetically modified organisms, Environ. Biosafety Res. 2005, 4, 67-70.