Interactions-based clustering to assist project risk management

DS 58-3: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design

Volumn 3, Issue , 2009, Pages 145-156

  Vidal, Ludovic Alexandre ^a   Marie, Franck ^a   Bocquet, Jean Claude ^a  

^a LGI   (France)

Author keywords

Clustering; Complexity; Interactions; Project management; Risk

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATED TOOL; CLUSTERING; CLUSTERING METHODS; COMPLEX PROJECTS; COMPLEXITY; ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY; FINAL OBJECTIVE; INTERACTION RATE; LINEAR PROGRAMMING ALGORITHM; MATRIX REPRESENTATION; PROJECT RISK; PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT;

ALGORITHMS; BEAM PLASMA INTERACTIONS; COORDINATION REACTIONS; CRITICALITY (NUCLEAR FISSION); PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISKS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84859240485     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. PMI, S.C., (2004) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK). Newton Square, PA, USA. : Project Management Institute.
2. Vidal, L.A., Marie F. and Bocquet J.C. (2007). Modeling project complexity. International Conference on Engineering Design, Paris, France.
3. Raz, T. and Hillson, D., (2005) A comparative review of risk management standards. Risk Management: An international journal, 7 (4): p. 53-66.
4. Baccarini, D., (1996) The concept of project complexity - a review. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4): p. 201-204.
5. Edmonds, B., (1999) Syntactic measures of complexity, in faculty of arts. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Manchester: Manchester.
6. Laurikkala H., Puustinen E., Pajarre E. and Tanskanen K., (2001) Reducing complexity of modelling in large delivery projects. International Conference on Engineering Design. Glasgow, Scotland.
7. Phelan, S., (1995) From chaos to complexity in strategic planning. 55th meeting of Academy of Management. Vancouver
8. Earl C, Johnson J. and Eckert C.M.,(2001) Complexity in planning design processes. International Conference on Engineering Design. Glasgow, Scotland.
9. Marie, F., (2002) Modèle d'informations et méthodes pour aider à la prise de décision en management de projets, Ph.D. Thesis. Ecole Centrale Paris: Paris.
10. Simon, H., (1981) The Sciences of the artificial. Cambridge The MIT Press.
11. Le Moigne, J.-L., (1990) La théorie du systeme général. Théorie de la modélisation. Presses Universitaires de France.
12. Sinlia S., Thomson A.I, and Kumar B., (2001) A complexity index for the design process. International Conference on Engineering Design. Glasgow, Scotland
13. Aissa, A., (2004) Formalisation et quantification de processus de gestion des interactions des projets, Masters Thesis, Ecole Centrale Paris: Paris.
14. Marie F., (2002) Methods for helping decision-making in projects, PMI Europe Conference, Cannes, France
15. Steward, D., (1981) The Design Structure Matrix: a method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Transactions in Engineering Management, 28(3): p. 71-74.
16. Eppinger, S., Whitney, D., Smith R. and Gebala D., (1994) A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Research in Engineering Design, (6): p. 1-13.
17. Eppinger, S. and Salminen, V., (2001) Patterns of product development interactions. International Conference on Engineering Design. 2001. Glasgow, Scotland.
18. Sosa, M., Eppinger S. and Rowles C. (2004) The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product development. Management Science, 50(12): p. 1674-1689.
19. Danilovic, M. and Browning, T., (2007) Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices. International Journal of Project Management, 25: p. 300-314.
20. Sosa, M., (2008) A structured approach to predicting and managing technical interactions in software development. Research in Engineering Design.
21. Vidal, L.A. and Marie, F., (2008) Understanding project complexity: implications on project management. Kybernetes, the International Journal of Systems, Cybernetics and Management Science.
22. Saaty, T., (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, p. 234-281.
23. Saaty, T., (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill.
24. Chen, S.-J., and Lin, L., (2003) Decomposition of interdependent task group for concurrent engineering. Computers and industrial engineering.
25. Hartigan, J.A., (1975) Clustering Algorithms. Wiley
26. Fowlkes, E.B. and Mallows, C.L., (1983). A Method for Comparing Two Hierarchical Clusterings. Journal of the American Statistical Association 78 (383): 553-584.
27. Mahaianobis, P C (1936). On the generalised distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India 2 (1): 49-55.
28. Murtagh, F., (1983) A survey of recent advances in hierarchical clustering algorithms. The Computer Journal. Volume 26, Number 4, pp. 354-359
29. Kutsch, E. and Hall, M. (2005) Intervening conditions on the management of project risk: Dealing with uncertainty in information technology projects, International Journal of Project Management, Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 591-599.