Publication: In whose interests?

Nursing in Critical Care

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 3-6

  Scholes, Julie ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; LITERATURE; NURSING CARE; PUBLICATION; STANDARD;

APHORISMS AND PROVERBS AS TOPIC; CRITICAL CARE; HUMANS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; NURSING CARE; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84859229960     PISSN: 13621017     EISSN: 14785153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2011.00484.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (11)

1. Bekhradnia B. (2009). Proposals for the research excellence framework - a critique. (accessed 14/11/11).
2. Dunleavy P. (2011). The research excellence framework is lumbering and expensive. For a fraction of the cost, a digital census of academic research would create unrivalled and genuine information about UK universities' research performance. (accessed 14/11/11).
3. HEFCE. (2010). Units of assessment and recruitment of expert panels. (accessed 14/11/11).
4. HEFCE. (2011). Research excellence framework REF 2014 timetable. (accessed 14/11/11).
5. Ketefian S, Dai Y, Hanucharunkul S, Mendes I, Norman I. (2010). Environments for nursing scholarship and journal impact factor in five countries. International Nursing Review, 57: 343-351.
6. Polit D, Northam S. (2011). Impact factors in nursing. Nursing Outlook, 59: 18-28.
7. Science Watch. (2010). Sci bytes - what's new in research journals ranked by impact factor Sci bytes 03·28·2010. (accessed 14/11/11).
8. Thomson-Reuters. Journal citation reports. (accessed 14/11/11).
9. Whetstone G. (1582). Heptameron of civil discourses. The dashe of a Pen, is more greevous than the counterbuse of a Launce.
10. Shakespeare W. (1602). Hamlet. Many wearing rapiers are afraid of goose-quills and dare scarce come thither.
11. Burton R. (1621). The anatomy of melancholy. From this it is clear how much more cruel the pen may be than the sword.