Automatic recognition of conceptualization zones in scientific articles and two life science applications

Bioinformatics

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 991-1000

  Liakata, Maria ^a,b   Saha, Shyamasree ^b   Dobnik, Simon ^c   Batchelor, Colin ^d   Rebholz schuhmann, Dietrich ^b  

^a ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^d ROYAL SOCIETY OF CHEMISTRY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; PUBLICATION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; INTERNET; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; SOFTWARE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84859229402     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts071     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ananiadou, S. et al. (2010) Event extraction for systems biology by text mining the literature. Trends Biotechnol., 28, 381-390.
2. Beigman Klebanov, B. and Beigman, E. (2009) From annotator agreement to noise models. Comput. Linguist., 35, 495-503.
3. Brandow, R. et al. (1995) Automatic condensation of electronic publications by sentence selection. Inform. Process. Manag., 31, 675-685.
4. Chang, C.-C. and Lin, C.-J. (2011) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., 2, 27:1-27:27.
5. Ciccarese, P. et al. (2008) The swan biomedical discourse ontology. J. Biomed. Inform., 41, 739-751.
6. Cohen, A.M. and Hersh, W.R. (2005) A survey of current work in biomedical text a survey of current work in biomedical text mining. Brief. Bioinform., 6, 57-71.
7. Cohen, J. (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas., 20, 37-46.
8. Curran, J. et al. (2007) Linguistically motivated large-scale nlp with c&c and boxer. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Companion Volume Proceedings of the Demo and Poster Sessions. Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 33-36.
9. de Waard, A. et al. (2009) Identifying the epistemic value of discourse segments in biology texts. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Computational Semantics, IWCS-8 '09, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 351-354.
10. deWaard, A. (2007)Apragmatic structure for research articles. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on PragmaticWeb, ICPW '07, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 83-89.
11. Fan, R.-E. et al. (2008) LIBLINEAR: a library for large linear classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 9, 1871-1874.
12. Guo, Y. et al. (2010) Identifying the information structure of scientific abstracts: an investigation of three different schemes. In Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 99-107.
13. Guo, Y. et al. (2011) A comparison and user-based evaluation of models of textual information structure in the context of cancer risk assessment. BMC Bioinform., 12:69, doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-69.
14. Hirohata, K. et al. (2008) Identifying sections in scientific abstracts using conditional random fields. In Proceedings of the IJCNLP 2008.
15. Kilicoglu, H. and Bergler, S. (2008) Recognizing speculative language in biomedical research articles: a linguistically motivated perspective. BMC Bioinform., 9 (Suppl. 11), S10.
16. Kim, J.-D. et al. (2011) Overview of BioNLP shared task 2011. In Proceedings of BioNLP Shared Task 2011 Workshop, Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, Oregon, USA, pp. 1-6.
17. Kummerfeld, J.K. et al. (2010) Faster parsing by supertagger adaptation. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '10, pp. 345-355.
18. Kupiec, J. et al. (1995) A trainable document summarizer. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '95, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 68-73.
19. Liakata, M. and Soldatova, L. (2008) Guidelines for the annotation of general scientific concepts. Technical report, JISC Project Report 88, Aberystwyth University, http://ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/88/.
20. Liakata, M. and Soldatova, L. (2009) The ART Corpus. Technical report, Aberystwyth University, http://hdl.handle.net/2160/1979.
21. Liakata, M. et al. (2009) Semantic annotation of papers: interface & enrichment tool (SAPIENT). In Proceedings of BioNLP-09, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 193-200.
22. Liakata, M. et al. (2010) Corpora for the conceptualization and zoning of scientific papers. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'10), European Language Resources Association, Valletta, Maltapp, pp. 2054-2061.
23. Light, M. et al. (2004) The language of bioscience: facts, speculations, and statements in between. In Hirschman, L. and Pustejovsky, J. (eds), HLT-NAACL 2004 Workshop: BioLINK 2004, Linking Biological Literature, Ontologies and Databases, Association for Computational Linguistics, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 17-24.
24. Lin, J. et al. (2006) Generative content models for structural analysis of medical abstracts. In Proceedings of theWorkshop on Linking Natural Language Processing and Biology: Towards Deeper Biological Literature Analysis, BioNLP '06, Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA, pp. 65-72.
25. McKnight, L. and Srinivasan, P. (2003) Categorization of sentence types in medical abstracts. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, pp. 440-444.
26. Medlock, B. and Briscoe, T. (2007) Weakly supervised learning for hedge classification in scientific literature. In 45th Annual Meeting of the ACL, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 23-30.
27. Merity, S. et al. (2009) Accurate argumentative zoning with maximum entropy models. In Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Text and Citation Analysis for Scholarly Digital Libraries, NLPIR4DL '09, Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA, pp. 19-26.
28. Minnen, G. et al. (2001) Applied morphological processing of english. Nat. Lang. Eng., 7, 207-223.
29. Mizuta, Y. et al. (2006) Zone analysis in biology articles as a basis for information extraction. Int. J. Med. Inform., 75, 468-487.
30. Mullen, T. et al. (2005) A baseline feature set for learning rhetorical zones using full articles in the biomedical domain. SIGKDD Explor., 7, 52-58.
31. Nawaz, R. et al. (2010) Meta-knowledge annotation of bio-events. In LREC, pp. 2498-2507.
32. Okazaki, N. (2007) CRFsuite: a fast implementation of Conditional Random Fields (CRFs), http://www.chokkan.org/software/crfsuite/, (20 February 2012, date last accessed).
33. Rimell, L. and Clark, S. (2009) Porting a lexicalized-grammar parser to the biomedical domain. J. Biomed. Inform., 42, 852-865.
34. Ruch, P. et al. (2007) Using argumentation to extract key sentences from biomedical abstracts. Int. J. Med. Inform., 76, 195-200.
35. Shatkay, H. et al. (2008) Multi-dimensional classification of biomedical text: toward automated, practical provision of high-utility text to diverse users. J. Bioinform., 24:18, 2086-2093.
36. Silva, J.F.d. et al. (1999) Using localmaxs algorithm for the extraction of contiguous and non-contiguous multiword lexical units. In Proceedings of the 9th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Progress in Artificial Intelligence, EPIA '99, Springer, London, UK, pp. 113-132.
37. Soldatova, L. and King, R. (2006) An ontology of scientific experiments. J. Roy. Soc. Interf., 3, 795-803.
38. Soldatova, L. and Liakata, M. (2007) An ontology methodology and cisp-the proposed core information about scientific papers. Technical Report. JISC Project Report 137, Aberystwyth University, http://ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/137/.
39. Teufel, S. and Moens, M. (2002) Summarizing scientific articles: experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Comput. Linguist., 28, 409-445.
40. Teufel, S. et al. (1999) An annotation scheme for discourse-level argumentation in research articles. In Proceedings of EACL, pp. 110-117.
41. Teufel, S. et al. (2009) Towards discipline-independent argumentative zoning: evidence from chemistry and computational linguistics. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 3 -Volume 3, EMNLP '09, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 1493-1502.
42. Teufel, S. (2000) Argumentative Zoning: Information Extraction from Scientific Text. PhD Thesis, School of Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
43. Teufel, S. (2010) The Structure of Scientific Articles: Applications to Citation Indexing and Summarization. Stanford: CSLI Publications, CSLI Studies in Computational Linguistics, Stanford, California, United States.
44. Thompson, P. et al. (2011) Enriching a biomedical event corpus with meta-knowledge annotation. BMC Bioinform., 12, 393.
45. White, E. et al. (2011) Hypothesis and evidence extraction from full-text scientific journal articles. In Proceedings of BioNLP 2011 Workshop, Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, Oregon, USA, pp. 134-135.
46. Wilbur, W.J. et al. (2006) New directions in biomedical text annotations: definitions, guidelines and corpus construction. BMC Bioinform., 7, 356.