When Common Identities Reduce Between-Group Helping

Social Psychological and Personality Science

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 259-265

  van Leeuwen, Esther ^a   Mashuri, Ali ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Meta stereotypes; Outgroup helping; Prosocial behavior; Strategic motives

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859227471     PISSN: 19485506     EISSN: 19485514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1948550611417315     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Dovidio J. F.,Gaertner S. L.,Shnabel N.,Saguy T.,Johnson J.The psychology of prosocial behavior: Group processes, intergroup relations, and helping. Stürmer S.Snyder M., ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010:191-208.
2. Dovidio J. F.,Gaertner S. L.,Validzic A.,Motoka K.,Johnson B.,Frazier S.Extending the benefits of recategorization: Evaluations, self-disclosure, and helping.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1997;33:401-420.
3. Gaertner S. L.,Dovidio J. F.Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2000:.
4. Gaertner S. L.,Dovidio J. F.,Bachman B. A.Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity.International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 1996;20:271-290.
5. Gaertner S. L.,Dovidio J. F.,Johnson G.Race of victim, nonresponsive bystanders, and helping behavior.The Journal of Social Psychology. 1982;117:69-77.
6. Gaertner S. L.,Mann J.,Murrell A.,Dovidio J. F.Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989;57:239-249.
7. Gilbert D. T.,Silvera D. H.Overhelping.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996;70:678-690.
8. Hopkins N.,Reicher S.,Harrison K.,Cassidy C.,Bull R.,Levine M.Helping to improve the group stereotype: On the strategic dimension of prosocial behavior.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2007;33:776-788.
9. Hornsey M. J.,Hogg M. A.Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2000;4:143-156.
10. Jetten J.,Spears R.,Postmes T.Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A meta-analytic integration.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004;86:862-879.
11. Kamans E.,Gordijn E. H.,Oldenhuis H.,Otten S.What I think you see is what you get: Influence of prejudice on assimilation to negative meta-stereotypes among Dutch Moroccan teenagers.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2009;39:842-851.
12. Levine M.,Prosser A.,Evans D.,Reicher S.Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2005;31:443-453.
13. Morton T. A.,Postmes T.Moral duty or moral defence? The effects of perceiving shared humanity with the victims of ingroup perpetrated harm.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2011;41:127-134.
14. Nadler A.,Harpaz-Gorodeisky G.,Ben-David Y.Defensive helping: Threat to group identity, ingroup identification, status stability, and common group identity as determinants of intergroup help-giving.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009;97:823-834.
15. Rosenberg A. S.,Treviño L. K.A proposed model of between-group helping: An identity-based approach.Journal of Managerial Issues. 2003;15:154-174.
16. Saucier D. A.,Miller C. T.,Doucet N.Differences in helping whites and blacks: A meta-analysis.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2005;9:2-16.
17. Sidanius J.,Pratto F.Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.
18. Stürmer S.,Snyder M.The psychology of prosocial behavior: Group processes, intergroup relations, and helping. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010:.
19. Tajfel H.,Turner J. C.The social psychology of intergroup relations. Austin W. G.Worchel S., ed. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole; 1979:33-47.
20. van Leeuwen E.Restoring identity through outgroup helping: Beliefs about international aid in response to the December 2004 tsunami.European Journal of Social Psychology, 671. 2007;:661-671.
21. van Leeuwen E.,Täuber S.The psychology of prosocial behavior: Group processes, intergroup relations, and helping. Stürmer S.Snyder M., ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010:81-99.
22. van Leeuwen E.,Täuber S.Demonstrating knowledge: The effects of group status on outgroup helping.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2011a;47:147-156.
23. van Leeuwen E.,Täuber S.Outgroup helping as a tool to communicate ingroup warmth. 2011b:.
24. van Leeuwen E.,van Knippenberg D.,Ellemers N.Continuing and changing group identities: The effects of merging on social identification and ingroup bias.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2003;29:679-690.
25. Vorauer J. D.,Main K. J.,O'Connell G. B.How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998;75:917-937.
26. Vorauer J. D.,Sasaki S. J.Helpful only in the abstract?.Psychological Science. 2009;20:191-197.
27. Wenzel M.,Mummendey A.,Waldzus S.Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model.European Review of Social Psychology. 2007;18:331-372.
28. Wit A. P.,Kerr N. L."Me versus just us versus us all" categorization and cooperation in nested social dilemmas.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002;83:616-637.