Pitch enumeration: Failure to subitize in audition

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  McLachlan, Neil M ^a   Marco, David J T ^a   Wilson, Sarah J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; AUDITORY SYSTEM PARAMETERS; COCHLEAR NERVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MUSIC; PITCH; VISUAL SYSTEM; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859219944     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033661     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Wender K, Rothkegel R, (2000) Subitizing and its subprocesses. Psych Res 64: 81-92.
2. Kaufman E, Lord M, Reese T, Volkmann J, (1949) The discrimination of visual number. Am J Psych 62: 498-525.
3. Piazza M, Mechelli A, Butterworth B, Price CJ, (2002) Are subitizing and counting implemented as separate or functionally overlapping processes? NeuroImage 15: 435-446.
4. Vetter P, Butterworth B, Bahrami B, (2008) Modulating attentional load affects numerosity estimation: Evidence against a pre-attentive subitizing mechanism. PloS ONE 3: e3269.
5. Terhardt E, (1974) Pitch, consonance, and harmony. J Acoust Soc Am 55: 1061-1069.
6. Thurlow WR, Rawlings IL, (1959) Discrimination of number of simultaneously sounding tones. J Acoust Soc Am 31: 1332-1336.
7. Ward R, (1954) Subjective musical pitch. J Acoust Soc Am 26: 520-529.
8. Houtsma AJM, Smurzynsak J, (1990) Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am 87: 304-310.
9. McLachlan NM, (2009) A computational model of human pitch strength and height judgments. Hear Res 249: 23-35.
10. Seither-Preisler M, Johnson L, Krumbholz K, Nobbe A, Patterson R, et al. (2007) Tone sequences with conflicting fundamental pitch and timbre changes are heard differently by musicians and nonmusicians. J Exp Psych: Hum Perc Perform 33: 743-751.
11. McLachlan NM, Wilson SJ, (2010) The Central Role of Recognition in Auditory Perception: A Neurobiological Model. Psych Rev 117: 175-196.
12. Moore BCJ, Hafter ER, Glasberg BR, (1996) The probe signal method and auditory filter shape: Results from normal and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 99: 542-552.
13. DeWitt L, Crowder R, (1987) Tonal fusion of consonant musical intervals: The oomph in Stumpf. Perc Psychophys 41: 73-84.
14. Parncutt R, (1989) Harmony: A psychoacoustical approach (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
15. Moore B, (1973) Frequency difference limens for short duration tones. J Acoust Soc Am 54: 610-619.
16. Alain C, (2007) Braking the wave: Effects of attention and learning on concurrent sound perception. Hear Res 229: 225-236.
17. Assmann PF, Paschall DD, (1998) Pitches of concurrent vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 103: 1150-1160.
18. Takeuchi AH, Hulse SH, (1993) Absolute pitch. Psych Bull 113: 345-361.
19. Krumhansl CL, (1990) Cognitive foundations of musical pitch (Oxford University Press, New York).
20. McLachlan NM, Keramati Nigjeh B, Hasell A, (2003) The design of bells with harmonic overtones. J Acoust Soc Am 114: 505-511.