Glandulocalyx upatoiensis, a fossil flower of Ericales (Actinidiaceae/ Clethraceae) from the Late Cretaceous (Santonian) of Georgia, USA

Annals of Botany

Volumn 109, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 921-936

  Schõnenberger, Jũrg ^a   Balthazar, Maria Von ^a   Takahashi, Masamichi ^b   Xiao, Xianghui ^c   Crane, Peter R ^d   Herendeen, Patrick S ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d Yale University   (United States)

^e CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

Actinidiaceae; Clethraceae; Ericales; flowers; fossils; Glandulocalyx upatoiensis; Late Cretaceous; Santonian

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; ESTIVATION; FLOWER; FOSSIL RECORD; FRUIT; MORPHOLOGY; NEW SPECIES; PALEOBOTANY; SANTONIAN; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SEED; SPECIMEN BANK; TOMOGRAPHY;

ACTINIDIACEAE; ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; CLETHRACEAE; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; FOSSIL; FRUIT; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PLANT SEED; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASTRUCTURE; UNITED STATES;

ACTINIDIACEAE; ANGIOSPERMS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CLETHRACEAE; FLOWERS; FOSSILS; FRUIT; GEORGIA; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PHYLOGENY; SEEDS;

GEORGIA; UNITED STATES;

ACTINIDIACEAE; ASTERIDS; CLETHRACEAE; CYRILLACEAE; ERICACEAE; ERICALES; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; RORIDULACEAE; SARRACENIACEAE;

EID: 84859175168     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcs009     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Agardh JG. 1858. Theoria systematis plantarum. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup.
2. Albach DC, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Olmstead RG. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of asterids based on sequences of four genes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 88: 163-212. (Pubitemid 32643979)
3. Anderberg AA. 1992. The circumscription of the Ericales, and their cladistic relationships to other families of higher dicotyledons. Systematic Botany 17: 660-675.
4. Anderberg AA. 1993. Cladistic interrelationships and major clades of the Ericales. Plant Systematics and Evolution 184: 207-231.
5. Anderberg AA, Rydin C, KällersjöM. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in the order Ericales s.l.: analyses of molecular data from five genes from the plastid and mitochondrial genomes. American Journal of Botany 89: 677-687. (Pubitemid 34439725)
6. APG III. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 105-121.
7. Artopoeus A. 1903. Über den Bau und die Öffnungsweise der Antheren und die Entwicklung der Samen der Erikaceen. Flora 92: 309-345.
8. Barkman TJ, Lim SH, Salleh KM, Nais J. 2004. Mitochondrial DNA sequences reveal the photosynthetic relatives of Rafflesia, the world's largest flower. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 787-792. (Pubitemid 38121036)
9. Bell CD, Soltis DE, Soltis PS. 2010. The age and diversification of the angiosperms re-revisited. American Journal of Botany 97: 1296-1303.
10. Brown EGS. 1935. The floral mechanism of Saurauia subspinosa Anth. Transactions and Proceedings of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 31: 485-497.
11. Brown WH. 1938. The bearing of nectaries on the phylogeny of flowering plants. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 79: 549-595.
12. Cane JH. 1993. Reproductive role of sterile pollen in Saurauia (Actinidiaceae), a cryptically dioecious neotropical tree. Biotropica 25: 493-495.
13. Christopher RA. 1982. Palynostratigraphy of the basal Cretaceous units of the eastern Gulf and southern Atlantic Coastal Plains. In Arden DD, Beck BF, Morrow E. eds. Proceedings of the Second Symposium on the Geology of the Southeastern Coastal Plain. Atlanta: Georgia Geological Survey, 10-23.
14. Conran JG. 2004. Roridulaceae. In Kubitzki K ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Volume VI. Flowering plants -dicotyledons. Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 339-342.
15. Copeland HF. 1941. Further studies on Monotropoideae. Madron"o 6: 97-144.
16. Copeland HF. 1947. Observations on the structure and classification of the Pyroleae. Madron"o 9: 33-64.
17. Crepet WL. 1996. Timing in the evolution of derived floral characters: Upper Cretaceous (Turonian) taxa with tricolpate and tricolpate derived pollen. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 90: 339-359.
18. Crepet WL. 2008. The fossil record of angiosperms requiem or renaissance? Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 95: 3-33. (Pubitemid 351568506)
19. Cronquist A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
20. Dahlgren R. 1983. General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. Nordic Journal of Botany 3: 119-149.
21. Dickison WC. 1972. Observations on the floral morphology of some species of Saurauia, Actinidia, and Clematoclethra. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 88: 43-54.
22. Diels L. 1930. Roridulaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K. eds. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Vol. 18a. 2nd edn. Leipzig: W. Engelmann, 346-348.
23. Dressler S, Bayer C. 2004. Actinidiaceae. In Kubitzki K. ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Volume VI. Flowering plants -dicotyledons. Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 14-19.
24. Endress PK. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Friis EM. 1985. Actinocalyx gen.nov., sympetalous angiosperm flowers from the Upper Cretaceous of southern Sweden. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 45: 171-183.
26. Friis EM, Crane PR, Pedersen KR. 2011. Early flowers and angiosperm evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Haber WA, Bawa KS. 1984. Evolution of dioecy in Saurauia (Dilleniaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71: 289-293.
28. Henrickson J. 1972. A taxonomic revision of the Fouquieriaceae. Aliso 7: 439-537.
29. Hermann PM, Palser BF. 2000. Stamen development in the Ericaceae. I. Anther wall, microsporogenesis, inversion, and appendages. American Journal of Botany 87: 934-957. (Pubitemid 30466775)
30. Hunter GE. 1966. Revision of Mexican and Central American Saurauia (Dilleniaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 53: 47-89.
31. Igersheim A. 1993. The character states of the Caribbean monotypic endemic Strumpfia (Rubiaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 13: 545-559. (Pubitemid 2015908)
32. Igersheim A, Cichocki O. 1996. A simple method for microtome sectioning of prehistoric charcoal specimens, embedded in 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 92: 389-393.
33. Kavaljian LG. 1952. The floral morphology of Clethra alnifolia with some notes on C. acuminata and C. arborea. Contributions from the Hull Botanical Laboratory 632. Botanical Gazette 113: 392-413.
34. Keller JA, Herendeen PS, Crane PR. 1996. Fossil flowers and fruits of the Actinidiaceae from the Campanian (Late Cretaceous) of Georgia. American Journal of Botany 83: 528-541.
35. Kubitzki K. 2004a. Cyrillaceae. In Kubitzki K. ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Volume VI. Flowering plants -dicotyledons. Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 114-116.
36. Kubitzki K. (ed.) 2004b. The families and genera of vascular plants. Volume VI. Flowering plants -dicotyledons. Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
37. Kubitzki K. 2004c. Sarraceniaceae. In: Kubitzki K. ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Volume VI. Flowering plants -dicotyledons. Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 422-425.
38. Leslie AB, Herendeen PS, Crane PR. 2009. Upatoia barnardii gen. et sp. nov., an araucarian pollen cone with in situ pollen from the Late Cretaceous (Santonian) of Georgia, USA. Grana 48: 128-135.
39. Luna I, Ochoterena H. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of the genera of Theaceae based on morphology. Cladistics 20: 223-270. (Pubitemid 39009290)
40. Lupia R, Schneider H, Moeser GM, Pryer KM, Crane PR Marsileaceae sporocarps and spores from the Late Cretaceous of Georgia, U.S.A. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: 975-988.
41. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2010. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.74. http://mesquiteproject.org.
42. Magallón S. 2010. Using fossils to break long branches in molecular dating: a comparison of relaxed clocks applied to the origin of angiosperms. Systematic Biology 59: 384-399.
43. Magallón S, Castillo A. 2009. Angiosperm diversification though time. American Journal of Botany 96: 349-365.
44. Magallón S, Crane PR, Herendeen PS. 1999. Phylogenetic pattern, diversity and diversification of eudicots. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 297-372. (Pubitemid 29358256)
45. Magallón-Puebla S, Herendeen PS, Crane PR. 1997. Quadriplatanus georgianus gen. et sp. nov.: staminate and pistillate platanaceous flowers from the Late Cretaceous (Coniacian-Santonian) of Georgia, USA. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158: 373-394. (Pubitemid 27474106)
46. Martínez-Millán M, Crepet WL, Nixon KC. 2009. Pentapetalum trifasciculandricus gen. et sp. nov., a thealean fossil flower from the Raritan Formation, New Jersey, USA (Turonian, Late Cretaceous). American Journal of Botany 96: 933-949.
47. Matthews JR, Knox EM. 1926. The comparative morphology of the stamen in the Ericaceae. Transactions and Proceedings of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 29: 243-281.
48. Matthews JR, Taylor DW. 1926. The structure and development of the stamen in Erica hirtiflora. Transactions and Proceedings of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 29: 235-242.
49. Nixon KC, Crepet WL. 1993. Late Cretaceous fossil flowers of ericalean affinity. American Journal of Botany 80: 616-623. (Pubitemid 23394627)
50. Paterson BR. 1961. Studies of floral morphology in the Epacridaceae. Botanical Gazette 122: 259-279.
51. PyykköM. 1969. Placentation in the Ericales. I. Pyrolaceae and Monotropaceae. Annales Botanici Fennici 6: 255-268.
52. Reed SM. 2006. Reproductive biology of Clethra alnifolia. Horticultural Science 41: 567-570.
53. Renner SS. 1989. Floral biological observations on Heliamphora tatei (Sarraceniaceae) and other plants from Cerro de la Neblina in Venezuela. Plant Systematics and Evolution 163: 21-29.
54. Schmid R. 1978. Actinidiaceae, Davidiaceae, and Paracryphiaceae: systematic considerations. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 100: 196-204.
55. Schnarf K. 1924. Bemerkungen zur Stellung der Gattung Saurauia im System. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien, Abteilung I. 133: 17-28.
56. Schneider JV, Bayer C. 2004. Clethraceae. In Kubitzki K. ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Volume VI. Flowering plants -dicotyledons. Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 69-73.
57. Schönenberger J. 2009. Comparative floral structure and systematics of Fouquieriaceae and Polemoniaceae (Ericales). International Journal of Plant Sciences 170: 1132-1167.
58. Schönenberger J, Friis EM. 2001. Fossil flowers of ericalean affinity from the Late Cretaceous of Southern Sweden. American Journal of Botany 88: 467-480. (Pubitemid 33644894)
59. Schönenberger J, Anderberg AA, Sytsma KJ. 2005. Molecular phylogenetics and patterns of floral evolution in the Ericales. International Journal of Plant Sciences 166: 265-288. (Pubitemid 40428673)
60. Schönenberger J, von Balthazar M, Sytsma KJ. 2010. Diversity and evolution of floral structure among early diverging lineages in the Ericales. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365: 437-448.
61. Shreve F. 1906. The development and anatomy of Sarracenia purpurea. Botanical Gazette 42: 107-123.
62. Soejarto DD. 1969. Aspects of reproduction in Saurauia. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 50: 180-196.
63. Soltis D, Soltis P, Chase M, et al. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 381-461. (Pubitemid 30661223)
64. Stevens PF. 2001. onwards. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 9, June 2008 [and more or less continuously updated since]. http://www.mobot. org/mobot/research/apweb/.
65. Stevens PF, Luteyn J, Oliver EGH, et al. 2004. Ericaceae. In: Kubitzki K. ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. VI. Flowering plants. -dicotyledons. Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 145-194.
66. Strauss SY, Zangerl AR. 2002. Plant-insect interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. In Herrera CM, Pellmyr O. eds. Plant-animal interactions: an evolutionary approach. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 77-106.
67. Thomas JL. 1961. The genera of the Cyrillaceae and Clethraceae of the Southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 42: 96-106.
68. Uphof JCT. 1936. Sarraceniaceae. In: Engler A, Harms H. eds. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Vol. 17b. 2nd edn. Leipzig: W. Engelmann, 704-727.
69. Vogel S. 1978. Evolutionary shifts from reward to deception in pollen flowers. In Richards AJ. ed. The pollination of flowers by insects. London: Academic Press, 89-96.
70. Zhang X-P, Anderberg AA. 2002. Pollen morphology in the ericoid clade of the order Ericales, with special emphasis on Cyrillaceae. Grana 41: 201-215. (Pubitemid 36058790)