Infection and revision strategies in total disc arthroplasty

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 471-474

  Gerometta, Antoine ^a   Rodriguez Olaverri, Juan Carlos ^a   Bittan, Fabian ^b  

^a LENOX HILL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; C REACTIVE PROTEIN;

ALLOGRAFT; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTHRODESIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEBRIDEMENT; DEVICE REMOVAL; DISKITIS; DRUG INDICATION; ERYTHROCYTE SEDIMENTATION RATE; HUMAN; INFECTION PREVENTION; INFECTION RISK; LEUKOCYTOSIS; OSTEOTOMY; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; REOPERATION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SPINE STABILIZATION; STAPHYLOCOCCUS INFECTION; STREPTOCOCCUS INFECTION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT FAILURE; WOUND DRAINAGE; WOUND IRRIGATION;

DEBRIDEMENT; DRAINAGE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; REOPERATION; THERAPEUTIC IRRIGATION; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84859160303     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1436-y     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Tropiano (2010) Expert's comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled "Revision of a lumbar disc arthroplasty following late infection". Eur Spine J 19:682-684
2. Spivak JM, Petrizzo AM (2010) Revision of a lumbar disc arthroplasty following late infection. Eur Spine J 19:677-681
3. Kostuik JP (2004) Complications and surgical revision for failed disc arthroplasty. Spine J 4(6 Suppl):289S-291S
4. Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM et al (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, Multicenter Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study of the Pro- Disc (R)-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 32(11):1155-1162 (Pubitemid 46743014)
5. Hannibal M, Thomas DJ, Low J et al (2007) ProDisc-L total disc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine 32(21):2322-2326 (Pubitemid 47508839)
6. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD et al (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration Investi- gational Device Exemptions Study of lumbar total disc replace- ment with the CHARITE(TM) artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30(14):1565-1575 (Pubitemid 41024950)
7. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE (TM) artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and corre- lation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 30 (14):1576-1583 (Pubitemid 41022418)
8. Wagner WH, Regan JJ, Leary SP et al (2006) Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charite lumbar artificial disc replacement. J Vasc Surg 44:1266-1272 (Pubitemid 44828397)
9. McAfee PC, Geisler FH, Saiedy SS et al (2006) Revisability of the Charite artificial disc replacement. Spine 31:1217-1226
10. Patel AA, Brodke DS, Pimenta L et al (2008) Revision strategies in lumbar total disc. Arthroplast 33:1276-1283 (Pubitemid 351698807)
11. Leary SP, Regan JJ, Lanman TH (2007) Revision and explantation strategies involving the Charite lumbar artificial disc replacement. Spine 32:1001-1011 (Pubitemid 46646767)
12. Bertagnoli R, Zigler J, Karg A et al (2005) Complications and strategies for revision surgery in total disc replacement. Orthop Clin North America 36:389-395 (Pubitemid 40805100)
13. Petrizzo AM, Spivak JM, Song EW, Bendo JA, Errico TJ, Goldstein JA (2005) Adverse events in patients undergoing total disc arthroplasty at a major academic center. A review of 93 patients (presented at North American Spine Society, SA5 and IMAST in 2005)
14. Cavanaugh DA, Nunley PD, Kerr EJ et al (2009) Delayed hyperreactivity to metal ions after cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine 34:E262-E265
15. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE (2004) Review article. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 351(16):1645-1654
16. Del Pozo JL, Patel R (2009) Clinical practice: infection associated with prosthetic joints. N Engl J Med 361(8):787-794
17. Brau SA, Delamarter RB, Kropf MA, Watkins RG 3rd, Williams LA SML, Bae HW (2008) Access strategies for revision in anterior lumbar surgery. Spine 33(15):1662-1667
18. Sasso RC, Kenneth Burkus J, LeHuec JC (2003) Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure. Spine 28:1023-1026 (Pubitemid 36583334)
19. Griffith SL, Shelokov AP, Buttner-Janz K et al (1994) A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the LINK SB Charité intervertebral prosthesis. The initial European experience. Spine 19:1842-1849 (Pubitemid 24314197)
20. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F (1996) Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 21:995-1000 (Pubitemid 26127221)
21. Zeegers WS, Bohnen LM, Laaper M et al (1999) Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 8:210-217