메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 198, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

Radiation dose management: Part 2, estimating fetal radiation risk from CT during pregnancy

Author keywords

ALARA; CT; Dose; Dose estimation; Fetus; Pregnancy; Radiation

Indexed keywords

CANCER RISK; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FETUS; FETUS RISK; GESTATIONAL AGE; HIGH RISK INFANT; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL EXPOSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION HAZARD; RADIATION SAFETY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK REDUCTION;

EID: 84859127855     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7458     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (44)

References (12)
  • 1
    • 78650825587 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Body CT during pregnancy: Utilization trends, examination indications, and fetal radiation doses
    • Goldberg-Stein S, Liu B, Hahn PF, Lee SI. Body CT during pregnancy: utilization trends, examination indications, and fetal radiation doses. AJR 2011; 196:146-151
    • (2011) AJR , vol.196 , pp. 146-151
    • Goldberg-Stein, S.1    Liu, B.2    Hahn, P.F.3    Lee, S.I.4
  • 3
    • 0036831529 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: Topics in CT - Radiation dose in CT
    • McNitt-Gray MF. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT - radiation dose in CT. RadioGraphics 2002; 22:1541-1553
    • (2002) RadioGraphics , vol.22 , pp. 1541-1553
    • McNitt-Gray, M.F.1
  • 4
    • 36849057737 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Imaging the pregnant patient for nonobstetric conditions: Algorithms and radiation dose considerations
    • Patel SJ, Reede DL, Katz DS, Subramaniam R, Amorosa JK. Imaging the pregnant patient for nonobstetric conditions: algorithms and radiation dose considerations. RadioGraphics 2007; 27:1705-1722
    • (2007) RadioGraphics , vol.27 , pp. 1705-1722
    • Patel, S.J.1    Reede, D.L.2    Katz, D.S.3    Subramaniam, R.4    Amorosa, J.K.5
  • 6
    • 53749083052 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Radiation dose to the fetus for pregnant patients undergoing multidetector CT imaging: Monte Carlo simulations estimating fetal dose for a range of gestational age and patient size
    • Angel E, Wellnitz CV, Goodsitt MM, et al. Radiation dose to the fetus for pregnant patients undergoing multidetector CT imaging: Monte Carlo simulations estimating fetal dose for a range of gestational age and patient size. Radiology 2008; 249:220-227
    • (2008) Radiology , vol.249 , pp. 220-227
    • Angel, E.1    Wellnitz, C.V.2    Goodsitt, M.M.3
  • 7
    • 0025139506 scopus 로고
    • Estimated fetal radiation dose from multislice CT studies
    • Felmlee JP, Gray JE, Leetzow ML, Price JC. Estimated fetal radiation dose from multislice CT studies. AJR 1990; 154:184-190
    • (1990) AJR , vol.154 , pp. 184-190
    • Felmlee, J.P.1    Gray, J.E.2    Leetzow, M.L.3    Price, J.C.4
  • 8
    • 66149105525 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Utilization of imaging in pregnant patients: 10-Year review of 5270 examinations in 3285 patients-1997-2006
    • Lazarus E, DeBenedectis C, North D, Spencer PK, Mayo-Smith WW. Utilization of imaging in pregnant patients: 10-year review of 5270 examinations in 3285 patients-1997-2006. Radiology 2009; 251:517-524
    • (2009) Radiology , vol.251 , pp. 517-524
    • Lazarus, E.1    DeBenedectis, C.2    North, D.3    Spencer, P.K.4    Mayo-Smith, W.W.5
  • 9
    • 34547761744 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Radiation exposure and pregnancy: When should we be concerned?
    • McCollough CH, Schueler BA, Atwell TD, et al. Radiation exposure and pregnancy: when should we be concerned? RadioGraphics 2007; 27:909-917
    • (2007) RadioGraphics , vol.27 , pp. 909-917
    • McCollough, C.H.1    Schueler, B.A.2    Atwell, T.D.3
  • 11
    • 16244398029 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ACOG Committee opinion number 299, September 2004 (replaces no. 158, September 1995): Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy
    • ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice
    • ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee opinion number 299, September 2004 (replaces no. 158, September 1995): guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104:647-651
    • (2004) Obstet Gynecol , vol.104 , pp. 647-651


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.