How can the public sector resolve complex issues?: Strategies for steering, administering and coping

Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 8-16

  Head, Brian W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Governance; Public administration; Public policy; Public sector organizations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859120848     PISSN: 17574323     EISSN: 17574331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17574321011028954     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Allen, G.M. and Gould, E.M. (1986), “Complexity, wickedness and public forests”, Journal of Forestry, Vol. 84 No. 4, pp. 20-4.
2. APSC (2007), “Tackling wicked problems: a public policy perspective”, Australian Public Service Commission, Canberra, available at: www.apsc.gov.au/publications07/wickedproblems.pdf (accessed 30 June 2009).
3. Bardach, E. (1998), Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftsmanship, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
4. Bemelmans-Videc, M.L., Rist, R. and Vedung, E. (Eds) (1998), Carrots, Sticks and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation, Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ.
5. Bentley, T. and Wilsdon, J. (Eds) (2003), The Adaptive State, Demos, London.
6. Bingham, L.B., Nabatchi, T. and O'Leary, R. (2005), “The new governance: practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 65 No. 5, pp. 547-58.
7. Bogdanor, V. (Ed.) (2005), Joined-up Government, Oxford University Press and the British Academy, Oxford.
8. Bryson, J.M., Crosby, B.C. and Stone, M.M. (2006), “The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 66, S1, pp. 44-55.
9. Camillus, J.C. (2008), “Strategy as a wicked problem”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86 No. 5, pp. 99-106.
10. Chapman, J. (2004), System Failure: Why Governments Must Learn to Think Differently, 2nd ed., Demos, London.
11. Conklin, J. (2006), “Wicked problems and social complexity”, in Conklin, J. (Ed.), Dialogue Mapping: Building Understanding of Wicked Problems, Wiley, Chichester.
12. Freeman, D.M. (2000), “Wicked water problems: sociology and local water organizations in addressing water resources policy”, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 483-91.
13. Goldsmith, S. and Eggers, W.D. (2004), Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
14. Head, B.W. (2008a), “Assessing network-based collaborations: effectiveness for whom?”, Public Management Review, Vol. 10 No. 6, pp. 733-49.
15. Head, B.W. (2008b), “Three lenses of evidence-based policy”, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 67 No. 1, pp. 1-11.
16. Head, B.W. (2008c), “Wicked problems in public policy”, Public Policy, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 101-18.
17. Head, B.W. and Alford, J. (2008), “Wicked problems: the implications for public management”, paper presentation to International Research Society for Public Management Conference, Brisbane, 26 March.
18. Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E. (2003), “Collaborative policy making: governance through dialogue”, in Hajer, M. and Wagenaar, H. (Eds), Deliberative Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 33-59.
19. Keast, R., Mandell, M., Brown, K. and Woolcock, G. (2004), “Network structures: working differently and changing expectations”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 64 No. 3, pp. 363-71.
20. Koppenjan, J. and Klijn, E.H. (2004), Managing Uncertainties in Networks, Routledge, London.
21. Kreuter, M., De Rosa, C., Howze, E. and Baldwin, G. (2004), “Understanding wicked problems: a key to advancing environmental health promotion”, Health Education & Behavior, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 441-54.
22. Lovan, W.R., Murray, M. and Shaffer, R. (Eds) (2004), Participatory Governance: Planning, Conflict Mediation and Public Decision-Making in Civil Society, Ashgate, Aldershot.
23. Mandell, M.P. (Ed.) (2001), Getting Results through Collaboration: Networks and Network Structures for Public Policy and Management, Quorum Books, Westport.
24. Nutley, S., Walter, I. and Davies, H. (2007), Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services, Policy Press, Bristol.
25. Pacanowsky, M. (1995), “Team tools for wicked problems”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 36-51.
26. Parker, S. and Gallagher, N. (Eds) (2007), The Collaborative State: How Working Together Can Transform Public Services, Demos, London.
27. Pollitt, C. (1990), Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience, Blackwell, Oxford.
28. Pressman, J.L. and Wildavsky, A. (1973), Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
29. Rittel, H.W.J. and Webber, M.M. (1973), “Dilemmas in a general theory of planning”, Policy Sciences, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 155-69.
30. Roberts, N.C. (2000), “Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution”, International Public Management Review, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1-19.
31. Salamon, L.M. (Ed.) (2002), The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
32. Schon, D.A. and Rein, M. (1994), Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies, Basic Books, New York, NY.
33. Wallace, M. (2008), “The dynamics of coping: maintaining normal public service while orchestrating complex change”, paper presented at Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management, Brisbane, 26 March, available at: www.irspm2008.bus.qut.edu.au/papers/documents/pdf/Wallace%20-%20The%20Dynamics%20of%20Coping%20-%20IRSPM%20-%202008.pdf (accessed 30 June 2009).