Incidence of ovarian maldescent in women with müllerian duct anomalies: Evaluation by MRI

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 198, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Allen, Jared W ^a   Cardall, Seth ^b   Kittijarukhajorn, Mayuree ^a   Siegel, Cary L ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Utah Radiology Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

Infertility; MRI; M llerian duct anomalies; Ovarian cysts

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; FEMALE GENITAL TRACT MALFORMATION; FEMALE GENITAL TRACT PARAMETERS; FOLLICLE COUNT; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; KIDNEY MALFORMATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULLERIAN DUCT ANOMALY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARY DISEASE; OVARY MALDESCENT; OVARY POSITION; OVARY SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UTERINE AGENESIS; UTERUS BICORNIS; UTERUS DIDELPHYS; UTERUS HYPOPLASIA; UTERUS MALFORMATION; UTERUS SEPTUS; UTERUS UNICORNIS;

ABNORMALITIES, MULTIPLE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KIDNEY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MULLERIAN DUCTS; OVARY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84859117982     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.6595     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Müllerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 2004; 233:19-34
2. Dabirashrafi H, Mohammad K, Moghadami-Tabrizi N. Ovarian malposition in women with uterine anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83:293-294
3. Verkauf BS, Bernhisel MA. Ovarian maldescent. Fertil Steril 1996; 65:189-192
4. The American Fertility Society. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988; 49:944-955
5. Ombelet W, Grieten M, DeNeubourg P, et al. Undescended ovary and unicornuate uterus: simplified diagnosis by the use of clomiphene citrate ovarian stimulation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Hum Reprod 2003; 18:858-862
6. Wharton LR. Two cases of supernumerary ovary and one of accessory ovary, with an analysis of previously reported cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1959; 78:1101-1119
7. Lachman MF, Berman MM. The ectopic ovary: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1991; 115:233-235
8. Pellerito JS, McCarthy SM, Doyle MB, Glickman MG, DeCherney AH. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology 1992; 183:795-800
9. Bardo DM, Black M, Schenk K, Zaritzky MF. Location of the ovaries in girls from newborn to 18 years of age: reconsidering ovarian shielding. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39:253-259
10. Beski S, Gorgy A, Venkat G, Craft IL, Edmonds K. Gestational surrogacy: a feasible option for patients with Rokitansky syndrome. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:2326-2328
11. Raziel A, Vaknin Z, Schachter M, et al. Ultrasonographic-guided percutaneous transabdominal puncture for oocyte retrieval in a rare patient with Rokitansky syndrome in an in vitro fertilization surrogacy program. Fertil Steril 2006; 86:1760-1763
12. Kives SL, Perlman S, Bond S. Ruptured hemorrhagic cyst in an undescended ovary. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39:e4-e6
13. Seoud MA, Khayyat H, Mufarrij IK. Ectopic pregnancy in an undescended fallopian tube: an unusual presentation. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69:455-457