Individual tree biomass model by tree origin, site classes and age groups

Shengtai Xuebao/ Acta Ecologica Sinica

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 740-757

  Li, Haikui ^a   Ning, Jinkui ^b  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF FORESTRY   (China)

^b JIANGXI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Above ground biomass; Age groups; Below ground biomass; Biomass model; Site classification; Weighted least square

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ALLOMETRY; BARK; BIOMASS; CALIBRATION; CONIFEROUS TREE; DATA SET; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ERROR ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

LARIX; PINUS MASSONIANA;

EID: 84859115278     PISSN: 10000933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5846/stxb201106300978     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ter-Mikaelian M T, Korzukhin M D. Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species. Forest Ecology and Management, 1997, 97 (1):1-24.
2. Jenkins J C, Chojnacky D C, Heath L S, Birdsey R A. National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. Forest Science, 2003, 49 (1): 12-35.
3. Lambert M C, Ung C H, Raulier F. Canadian national tree aboveground biomass equations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2005, 35(8): 1996-2018.
4. Cole T G, Ewel J J. Allometric equations for four valuable tropical tree species. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 229 (1/3): 351-360.
5. Banaticla M R N, Sales R F, Lasco R D. Biomass equations for tropical tree plantation species using secondary data for the Philippines. 2005. In: Harrison S R, Herbohn J L, Suh J, Mangaoang E, Vanclay J. ACIAR smallholder forestry project-redevelopment of a timber industry following extensive land clearing: Proceeding from the End-of-Project workshop, Ormoc, the Philippines, 185-193.
6. Zabek L M, Prescott C E. Biomass equations and carbon content of above ground leafless biomass of hybrid poplar in Coastal British Columbia. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 223 (1/3): 291-302.
7. Repola J, Ojansuu R, Kukkola Mikko. Biomass functions for scots pine, Norway spruce and birch in Finland. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute, 2007. (http:/ / www. metla. fi/ julkaisut/ workingpapers/2007/ mwp053. htm).
8. Mikšys V, Varnagiryte-Kabasinskiene I, Stupak Inge, Armolaitis K, Kukkola M, Wójcik J. Above-ground biomass functions for Scots pine in Lithuania. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2007, 31 (10): 685-692.
9. Mani S, Parthasarathy N. Above-ground biomass estimation in ten tropical dry erergreen forest site of peninsular India. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2007, 31 (5): 284-290.
10. Muukkonen P, Lehtonen A. Needle and branch biomass turnover rates of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2004, 34 (12): 2517-2527.
11. Verónica G, Luis P P, Gerardo R. Allometric relations for biomass partitioning of Nothofagus Antarctica trees of different crown classes over a site quality gradient. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010, 259 (6): 1118-1126.
12. Porté A, Trichet P, Bert D, Loustau D. Allometric relationships for branch and tree woody biomass of Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aït.). Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, (158): 71-83.
13. Russell M B, Burkhart H E, Amateis R L. Biomass partitioning in a miniature-scale loblolly pine spacing trial. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2009, 39 (12): 320-329.
14. Brandeis T J, Delaney M, Parresol B R, Royer L. Development of equations for predicting Puerto Rican subtropical dry forest biomass and volume. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 233 (1): 133-142.
15. Tahvanainen T, Forss E. Individual tree models for the crown biomass distribution of Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch in Finland. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255 (3/4): 455-467.
16. Gehring C, Park S, Denich M. Liana allometric biomass equations for Amazonian primary and secondary forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 195 (1/2): 69-83.
17. Snorrason A, Einarsson S F. Single-tree biomass and stem volume functions for eleven tree species used in Icelandic forestry. Icelandic Agricultural Science, 2006, 19: 15-24.
18. Carvalho J P, Parresol B R. Additivity in tree biomass components of Pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.). Forest Ecology and Management, 2003, 179 (1/3): 269-276.
19. Salis S M, Assis M A, Mattos P P, Pião A C S. Estimating the aboveground biomass and wood volume of savanna woodlands in Brazil's Pantanal wetlands based on allometric correlations. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 228 (1/3): 61-68.
20. Návar J. Allometric equations for tree species and carbon stocks for forest of northwestern Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 257 (2): 427-434.
21. Ribeiro S C, Fehrmann L, Soares C P B, Jacovine L A G, Kleinn C, Gaspar R O. Above-and belowground biomass in a Brazilian Cerrado. Forest Ecology and Management, 2011, 262 (3): 491-499.
22. Xiao C W, Ceulemans R. Allometric relationships for below-and aboveground biomass of young Scots pines. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 203 (1/3): 177-186.
23. Saint-André L, M'Bou A T, Mabiala A, Mouvondy W, Jourdan C, Roupsard O, Deleporte P, Hamel O, Nouvellon Y. Age-related equations for above-and below-ground biomass of a Eucalyptus hybrid in Congo. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 205 (1/3): 199-214.
24. Luo T, Brown S, Pan Y, Shi P, Ouyang H, Yu Z, Zhu H. Root biomass along subtropical to alpine gradients: global implication form Tibetan transect studies. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 206 (1/3): 349-363.
25. Peichl M, Arain M A. Allometry and partitioning of above-and belowground tree biomass in an age-sequence of white pine forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 253 (1/3):68-80.
26. Peri P L, Gargaglione V, Pastur G M. Dynamics of above-and below-ground biomass and nutrient accumulation in an age sequence of Nothofagus Antarctica forest of Southern Patagonia. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 233 (1): 85-99.
27. Pang W S, Li L C, Gao Z H, Zhang X Q. Study on biomass and productivity in ecology system of China fir plantation. Hunan Forestry Science and Technology, 1978, (2): 2-14.
28. Feng Z W, Zhang J W, Deng S J. Study on biomass production of China fir plantation // The comprehensive scientific expedition team of Chinese academy of science for agriculture modernization in Taoyuan county in Hunan province. The report set on comprehensive survey in Xiantao. Changsha: Hunan Science and Technology House. 1980:322-333.
29. Yu X T. Chian fir. Fuzhou: Fujian Science and Technology house. 1983: 55-58.
30. Chen Z S, Fang Q. A study on nutrient content and biomass of Populus Bolleana. Forest Research, 1988, 1 (5): 535-540.
31. Dang C L, Wu Z L. Studies on the biomass of Pinus Yunnanesis forest. Acta Bontica Yunnaica, 1991, 13 (1): 59-64.
32. Wang C K. Biomass allometric equations for 10 co-occurring tree species in Chinese temperate forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 222 (1/3), 9-16.
33. Feng Z W, Chen C Y, Zhang J W, Wang K P, Zhao J L, Gao H. Detemination of biomass of Pinus Massonian Stand in Huitong County, Hunan province. Scientia Slivae Sincae, 1982, 18(2): 127-134.
34. Ma Q Y. A study on the biomass of Chinese pine forests. Journal of Beijing Forestry Universtiy, 1989, 11 (4): 1-10.
35. Zhang B L. Study on biomass and Productivity of Quercus lidotungensis stands in ziwuling forest region of Shaanxi province. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 1990, 5 (1): 1-7.
36. Xu H Y, Zheng S K, Lu Y N. The biomass of (I-75/58) Poplar plantation. Scientia Slivae Sincae, 1990, 26 (1): 22-29.
37. Xu H, Zhang H R. Study on biomass model of tree and stand. Kunming: Yunnan Science and Technology House, 2002: 116-150.
38. Luo Q B, Zeng W S, Hu D B, Bao T H, Lin W Z. Establishment and application of compatible tree above ground biomass models. Journal of Natural Resource, 1991, 14 (3): 271-277.
39. Zeng W S, Xia Z S, Zhu S, Luo H Z. Estatblishment of tree volume and aboveground biomass equation for Masson pine plantation in Guizhou Province. Scientia Slivae Sincae, 2011, 47 (3): 96-101.
40. Li H K, Lei Y C. Estimation and evulation of forest biomass carbon storage in China. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2010: 14-16, 21-23.
41. Tang S Z, Li Y. Statistics base of biomathematics model. Beijing: Science Press, 2002: 130-138.
42. Tang S Z, Lang K J, Li H K. Calculation for statistics and biomathematics model. Beijing: Science Press, 2009: 268-290.
43. Geron C D, Ruark G A. Comparison of constant and variable allometric ratio for predicting foliar biomass of various tree genera. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1988, 18 (10): 1298-1304.
44. Xu H, Wang M L. Comparison of CAR and VAR Biomass Models. Forestry Studies in China, 2010, (1): 32-36.
45. Ruark G A, Martin G L, Bockheim J G. Comparison of constant and variable allometric ratios for estimating Populus tremuloides biomass. Forest Science, 1987, 33 (2): 294-300.
46. Zeng W S, Luo Q B, He D B. Research on weighting regression and modeling. Scientia Slivae Sincae, 1999, 35 (5):5-11.
47. Moreno E, Torres Francisco, Casella G. Testing equality of regression coefficients in heteroscedastic normal regression models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2005, 131 (1): 117-134.
48. Zeng W S, Tang S Z. Establishment of below-ground biomass equations for larch in northeastern and Masson pine in southern Chian. Journal of Beijing Forestry Universtiy, 2011, 33 (2): 1-6.