Monitoring the performance of innovative and traditional biocides mixed with consolidants and water-repellents for the prevention of biological growth on stone

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 423, Issue , 2012, Pages 132-141

  Pinna, Daniela ^a   Salvadori, Barbara ^a,b   Galeotti, Monica ^a  

^a Geriatric Department   (Italy)

^b Istituto per la Conservazione e la Valorizzazione dei Beni Culturali Sesto Fiorentino   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biological growth; Bioreceptivity; Copper nanoparticles; Organic treatments; Prevention; Re colonization

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL GROWTH; BIORECEPTIVITY; COPPER NANOPARTICLES; ORGANIC TREATMENT; PREVENTION; RE-COLONIZATION;

BIOCIDES; MARBLE; METAL NANOPARTICLES; MIXTURES; NONINVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES; PLASTER; SANDSTONE; SILICONES;

SUBSTRATES;

BIOCIDE; CHEMICAL COMPOUND; CONSOLIDANT; COPPER NANOPARTICLE; DIBUTYLIN DILAURATE; METHYLETHOXY POLYSILOXANE; NANOPARTICLE; PARALOID B72; POLYSILOXANE; TETRAETHOXYSILANE; TRIBUTYLIN OXIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER REPELLENT;

ABSORPTION; COPPER; MARBLE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PESTICIDE; SANDSTONE; SUBSTRATE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL COLONIZATION; BIOLOGICAL GROWTH; BIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS CONCERNING THE ENTIRE ORGANISM; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GEOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; GROWTH; ITALY; MARBLE; MEASUREMENT; MICROSCOPY; PLASTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SANDSTONE; STEREOMICROSCOPY; STONE; WATER ABSORPTION;

ABSORPTION; BIOFILMS; CALCIUM CARBONATE; COPPER; DISINFECTANTS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; METAL NANOPARTICLES; ORGANOTIN COMPOUNDS; SILANES; SILOXANES; TRIALKYLTIN COMPOUNDS;

EID: 84859103618     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Appolonia L., Fassina V., Matteoli U., Mecchi A.M., Nugari M.P., Pinna D., et al. Methodology for the evaluation of protective products for stone materials. Part II: experimental tests on treated samples. Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Methods of Evaluating Products for the Conservation of Porous Building Materials in Monuments 1995, 301-316. Roma, ICCROM.
2. Ariño X., Canals A., Gomez-Bolea A., Saiz-Jimenez C. Assessment of the performance of a water-repellent/biocide treatment after 8 years. Proceedings of the Congress on Protection and Conservation of the Cultural Heritage of the Mediterranean Cities 2002, 121-125. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse.
3. Bartolini M., Nugari M.P. Resistance to biodeterioration of some products used for rising damp barrier. Proceedings of the Congress on Protection and Conservation of the Cultural Heritage of the Mediterranean Cities 2002, 397-400. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse.
4. Bracci S., Melo M.J. Correlating natural ageing and Xenon irradiation of Paraloid® B72 applied on stone. Polym Degrad Stab 2003, 80:533-541.
5. Brugnara M., Degasperi E., Della Volpe C., Maniglio D., Penati A., Siboni S., et al. The application of the contact angle in monument protection: new materials and methods. Colloids Surf, A 2004, 241:299-312.
6. Plant biology for cultural heritage - biodeterioration and conservation 2008, The Getty Conservation Institute. G. Caneva, M.P. Nugari, O. Salvadori (Eds.).
7. Cappitelli F., Zanardini E., Sorlini C. The biodeterioration of synthetic resins used in conservation. Macromol Biosci 2004, 4(4):399-406.
8. Cappitelli F., Nosanchuk J.D., Casadevall A., Toniolo L., Brusetti L., Florio S., et al. Synthetic consolidants attacked by melanin-producing fungi: case study of the biodeterioration of Milan (Italy) cathedral marble treated with acrylics. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007, 73(1):271-277.
9. Caputo G., Maetzke G. Presentazione del rilievo di Fiesole Antica. Studi Etruschi 1959, 27:41.
10. Delgado Rodrigues J., Anjos M.V., Charola A.E. Recolonization of marble sculptures in a garden environment. Proceedings of the Workshop Biocolonization of Stone: Control and Preventive Methods 2011, 71-86. Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.
11. Di Taranto N., Lo Perfido S., van der Werf I., Mangone A., Ciuffi N., Sabbatini L. Synthesis and analytical characterisation of copper-based nanocoatings for bioactive stone artworks treatment. Anal Bioanal Chem 2011, 399:473-481.
12. EN15886 Conservation of cultural property. Test methods - colour measurement of surfaces 2010.
13. Ferreira Pinto A., Delgado Rodrigues J. Assessment of the durability of water-repellents by means of exposure tests. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone. Venice 2000, Vol. 2:273-285.
14. Fratini F. Le malte degli edifici termali dell'area archeologica di Fiesole. Institute for the Conservation and Valorisation of Cultural Heritage, Italian National Research Council, Firenze. Internal report, 2005. Unpublished results.
15. Gomez-Bolea A., Ariño X., Balzarotti R., Saiz-Jimenez C. Surface treatment of stones: consequences on lichen colonization. Proceedings of the Congress Of microbes and art, Firenze 1999, 233-237.
16. Gu J.-D. Microbiological deterioration and degradation of synthetic polymeric materials: recent research advances. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2003, 52:69-91.
17. Henriques F., Charola A.E., Moreira Rato V., Fraria Rodriguez P. Development of biocolonization resistant mortars: preliminary results. Restoration of buildings and monuments = Bauinstandsetzen und Baudenkmalpflege 2007, 13:389-400.
18. Hoppert M., Konig S. The succession of biofilms on building stone and its possible impact on biogenic weathering. Proceedings of the Congress Heritage, Weathering and Conservation 2006, 311-315. Taylor & Francis Group, London.
19. Karatasios I., Theoulakis P., Kalagri A., Sapalidis A., Kilikoglou V. Evaluation of consolidation treatments of marly limestones used in archaeological monuments. Constr Build Mater 2009, 23:2803-2812.
20. Koestler R.J. Polymers and resins as food for microbes. Proceedings of the Congress of Microbes and Art, Firenze 1999, 153-167.
21. Laurenzi Tabasso M. Testing consolidants. A case study on the selection of consolidants for the plaster of wall paintings. Proceedings of the International Symposium Stone Consolidation in Cultural Heritage. Lisbon 2008, 15-27.
22. Lugauskas A., Levinskaite L., Pečiulyte D. Micromycetes as deterioration agents of polymeric materials. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2003, 52:233-242.
23. Malagodi M., Nugari M.P., Altieri A., Lonati G. Effects of combined application of biocides and protectives on marble. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone. Venice 2000, Vol. 2:225-233.
24. Melo M.J., Bracci S., Camaiti M., Chiantore O., Piacenti F. Photodegradation of acrylic resins used in the conservation of stone. Polym Degrad Stab 1999, 66:23-30.
25. Miller A. Z, Laiz L, Dionísio A. Macedo MF. Primary bioreceptivity: A comparative study of different Portuguese lithotypes. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2006, 57:136-142.
26. Moreau C., Vèrges-Belmin V., Leroux L., Orial G., Fronteau G., Barbin V. Water-repellent and biocide treatments: assessment of the potential combinations. J Cult Herit 2008, 9:394-400.
27. Nascimbene J., Salvadori O. Lichen Recolonization on Restored Calcareous Statues of Three Venetian Villas. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2008, 62:313-318.
28. Nascimbene J., Salvadori O., Nimis P. L. Monitoring Lichen Recolonization on a Restored Calcareous Statue. Sci Total Environ 2009, 407:2420-2426.
29. Nugari M.P., Salvadori O. Biocides and treatment of stone: limitation and future prospects. Proceedings of the Congress Art, Biology and Conservation: Biodeterioration of Works of Art. New York 2003, 518-535.
30. Pallecchi P., Pinna D. Azione della crescita dei licheni sulla pietra nell'area archeologica di Fiesole. Stud Geobotanica 1988, 8:113-124.
31. Prieto B., Silva B. Estimation of the potential bioreceptivity of granitic rocks from their intrinsic properties. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2005, 56(4):206-215.
32. Quaresima R., Baccante A., Volpe R., Corain B. Realisation and possibility of polymeric metalo-organic matixes with biocides activity. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on the conservation of Monuments in the Mediterranean Rhodes 1997, 323-335.
33. Salvadori O., Charola A.E. Methods to prevent biocolonization and recolonization: an overview of current research for architectural and archaeological heritage 2011, 37-50. Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.
34. Salvadori O., Nugari M.P. The effect of microbial growth on synthetic polymers used on works of art. Biodeterioration 7 1988, 424-427. Elsevier, Amsterdam. D.R. Houghton, R.N. Smith, H.O.W. Smith (Eds.).
35. Sebastián E.M., de la Torre M.J., Cazalla O., Coltrone G., Rodríguez-Navarro C. Evaluation of treatments on biocalcarenites with ultrasound. Proceedings of the 6th World Conference on NDT and Microanalysis in Diagnostics and Conservation of Cultural and Environmental Heritage. Rome 1999, Vol. 4, issue 12.
36. Shirakawa M.A., Beech I.B., Tapper R., Cincotto M.A., Gambale W. The development of a method to evaluate bioreceptivity of indoor mortar plastering to fungal growth. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2003, 51(2):83-92.
37. Snethlage R., Sterflinger K. Stone Conservation - Chapter 7. Stone in Architecture. Fourth Edition. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2011, 512. S. Siegesmund, R. Snethlage (Eds.).
38. Stroganov V.F., Kukoleva D.A., Akhmetshin AS A.S., Stroganov I.V. Biodeterioration of polymers and polymer composite materials. Polym Sci 2009, 2(3):164-166.
39. Tiano P., Pardini C. Valutazione in situ dei trattamenti protettivi per il materiale lapideo. Proposta di una nuova semplice metodologia. Arkos 2004, 5:30-36.
40. Toniolo L., Paradisi A., Goidanich S., Carnelli D., Pennati G. Surface consolidation of ancient plasters: the problem of the efficacy evaluation. Proceedings of the International Symposium Stone Consolidation in Cultural Heritage. Lisbon 2008, 251-260.
41. Urzi' C., De Leo F. Evaluation of the efficiency of water-repellent and biocide compounds against microbial colonization of mortars. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2007, 60:25-34.
42. Urzi' C., De Leo F., Galletta M., Salamone P., Balzarotti R. Efficiency of biocide in "in situ" and "in vitro" treatment. Study case of the "Templete de Mudejar", Guadalupe, Spain. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone. Venice 2000, 531-539.
43. Vandevoorde D., Pamplona M., Schalm O., Vanhellemont Y., Cnudde V., Verhaeven E. Contact sponge method: performance of a promising tool for measuring the initial water absorption. J Cult Herit 2009, 10(1):41-47.
44. Vèrges-Belmin V., Rolland O., Leroux L. Can we be confident in colour measurements performed outdoors. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone. Torun (Poland) 2008, 539-546.
45. Warscheid T., Leisen H. Microbiological studies on stone deterioration and development of conservation measures at Angkor Wat. Proceedings of the Workshop Biocolonization of Stone: Control and Preventive Methods 2011, 1-18. Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.
46. Wheeler G. Alkoxysilanes and the consolidation of stone 2005, The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, CA.