Perspectives on the art and science of management scholarship

Academy of Management Perspectives

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 6-11

  Devinney, Timothy M ^a   Siegel, Donald S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859089419     PISSN: 15589080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amp.2012.0001     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Feigenbaum, S., & Levy, D. M. (1993). The market for (ir)reproducible econometrics. Accountability in Research, 3(1), 25-43.
2. Hubbard, R., & Vetter, D. E. (1996). An empirical comparison of published replication research in accounting, economics, finance, management, and marketing. Journal of Business Research, 35(2), 153-164. (Pubitemid 126159608)
3. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Mayo, D. (1996). Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (1997). Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 626-657. (Pubitemid 127089718)
7. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Teoh, S. H. (1999). Issues in the use of the event study methodology: A critical analysis of corporate social responsibility studies. Organizational Research Methods, 2(4), 340-365.
8. Oberheim, E. (2005). On the historical origins of the contemporary notion of incommensurability: Paul Feyerabend's assault on conceptual conservatism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 36(2), 363-390. (Pubitemid 40792329)
9. Venaik, S., Midgley, D. F., & Devinney, T. M. (2004). A new perspective on the integration-responsiveness pressures confronting multinational firms. Management International Review, 44(1), 15-48.