Examining learning in multiple settings: Using a linkograph to examine design learning

Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures 2005 - Proceedings of the 11th International CAAD Futures Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 187-196

  Kvan, Thomas K ^a   Gao, Song G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Design process; Learning; Linkograph

Indexed keywords

DESIGN COMMUNICATION; DESIGN EXCHANGES; DESIGN LEARNING; DESIGN PROCESS; DOUBLE-LOOP LEARNING; DYNAMIC PROCESS; LEARNING; LINKOGRAPH; TEXT-BASED COMMUNICATION;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 84859078815     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Andriessen, J.H.E. 1996. The why, how and what to evaluate of interaction technology: A review and proposed integration. In Cscw Requirements and Evaluation, eds. Peter J. Thomas: 106-124. Berlin: Springer.
2. Argyris, Chris, and Donald A. Schön. 1996. Organizational learning II: Theory, Method and Practice. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
3. Biggs, John B. 1999. Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education: Open University Press.
4. Cross, Nigel. 1980. Design methods and learning methods. In Proceedings of the 1980 Design Research Society Conference, eds. James A Powell: 281-296. Guilford: Westbury House.
5. Cuff, Dana. 1991. Architecture: The story of practice. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
6. Doolittle, Peter E. 1997. Vygotsky's zone of proximal development as a theoretical foundation for cooperative learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 8(1): 83-103.
7. Eason, K., and W. Olphert. 1996. Early evaluation of the organisational implications of cscw systems. In Cscw Requirements and Evaluation, eds. Peter J. Thomas: 75-89. Berlin: Springer.
8. Fiol, C.M., and M.A. Lyles. 1985. Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review 10(4): 803-813.
9. Gabriel, G., and M.L. Maher. 2000. Analysis of design communication with and without computer mediation. In Collaborative Design: Proceedings of Codesigning 2000, eds. S.A.R. Scrivener, L.J. Ball and A. Woodcock: 329-337. London: Springer.
10. Goldschmidt, Gabriela. 1990. Linkography: Assessing design productivity. In Cybernetics and Systems'90, eds. R. Trappl: 291-298. Singapore: World Scientific.
11. Kvan, Thomas, and Song Gao. 2004. Problem framing in multiple settings. International Journal of Architectural Computing 2(4): 443-460.
12. Kvan, Thomas, John T. H. Wong, and Alonso Vera. 2003. The contribution of structural activities to successful design. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology 16(2/3): 122-126.
13. Lahti, Henna, Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, and Kai Hakkarainen. 2004. Collaboration patterns in computer supported collaborative designing. Design Studies 25(4): 351-371.
14. Schön, Donald A. 1985. The design studio: An Exploration of Its Traditions and Potentials, London: RIBA Publications.
15. Vygotskii, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process, ed. Michael Cole, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.