Increases in electroencephalogram and electromyogram variability are associated with an increased incidence of intraoperative somatic response

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 759-770

  Mathews, Donald M ^a   Clark, Laura ^b   Johansen, Jay ^c   Matute, Emilio ^d   Seshagiri, Chandran V ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Hospital Sanitas La Moraleja   (Spain)

^e MEDTRONIC INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL; SEVOFLURANE;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANTINOCICEPTION; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BISPECTRAL INDEX; COMPOSITE VARIABILITY INDEX; DEMOGRAPHY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; INTRAOPERATIVE SOMATIC RESPONSE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT;

EID: 84859073646     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182455ac2     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Prys-Roberts C. Anaesthesia: a practical or impractical construct? Br J Anaesth 1987;59:1341-5 (Pubitemid 17159331)
2. Bennett C, Voss LJ, Barnard JP, Sleigh JW. Practical use of the raw electroencephalogram waveform during general anesthesia: the art and science. Anesth Analg 2009;109:539-50
3. Hemmerling TM, Le N. Brief review: neuromuscular monitoring - an update for the clinician. Can J Anaesth 2007;54:58 -72
4. Guignard B. Monitoring analgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2006;20:161-80
5. Rampil IJ, Laster MJ. No correlation between quantitative electroencephalographic measurements and movement response to noxious stimuli during isoflurane anesthesia in rats. Anesthesiology 1992;77:920-5
6. Huang L, Yu P, Ju F, Cheng J. Prediction of response to incision using the mutual information of electroencephalograms during anaesthesia. Med Eng Phys 2003;25:321-7 (Pubitemid 36332096)
7. Sebel PS, Lang E, Rampil IJ, White PF, Cork R, Jopling M, Smith NT, Glass PS, Manberg P. A multicenter study of bispectral electroencephalogram analysis for monitoring anesthetic effect. Anesth Analg 1997;84:891-9 (Pubitemid 27147721)
8. Guignard B, Menigaux C, Dupont X, Fletcher D, Chauvin M. The effect of remifentanil on the bispectral index change and hemodynamic responses after orotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2000;90:161-7 (Pubitemid 30022990)
9. Bloom M, Kearse L, Rosow C, Sebel P, Glass PS, Devlin P, Greenwald S. Bispectral index measures EEG changes due to response to stimulus. Anesthesiology 1995;83:A516
10. Menigaux C, Guignard B, Adam F, Sessler DI, Joly V, Chauvin M. Esmolol prevents movement and attenuates the BIS response to orotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 2002;89:857-62 (Pubitemid 35469043)
11. Röpcke H, Rehberg B, Koenen-Bergmann M, Bouillon T, Bruhn J, Hoeft A. Surgical stimulation shifts EEG concentration-response relationship of desflurane. Anesthesiology 2001;94:390-9 (Pubitemid 32198444)
12. Seshagiri CV, Smith C, Greenwald SD. CVI predicts intraoperative somatic responses better than heart rate. Anesth Analg 2008;106:S-28
13. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-36 (Pubitemid 12142173)
14. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839-43 (Pubitemid 13033817)
15. Eger EI II. Age, minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration, and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration-awake. Anesth Analg 2001;93:947-53
16. Millan MJ. The induction of pain: an integrative review. Prog Neurobiol 1999;57:1-164 (Pubitemid 28551764)
17. Wennervirta J, Hynynen M, Koivusalo AM, Uutela K, Huiku M, Vakkuri A. Surgical stress index as a measure of nociception/antinociception balance during general anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;52:1038-45
18. Kallio H, Lindberg LI, Majander AS, Uutela KH, Niskanen ML, Paloheimo MP. Measurement of surgical stress in anaesthetized children. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:383-9
19. Struys MM, Vanpeteghem C, Huiku M, Uutela K, Blyaert NB, Mortier EP. Changes in a surgical stress index in response to standardized pain stimuli during propofol-remifentanil infusion. Br J Anaesth 2007;99:359-67 (Pubitemid 47321535)
20. Storm H. Changes in skin conductance as a tool to monitor nociceptive stimulation and pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008;21:796-804
21. von Dincklage F, Hackbarth M, Mager R, Rehberg B, Baars JH. Monitoring of the responsiveness to noxious stimuli during anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil by using RIII reflex threshold and bispectral index. Br J Anaesth 2010;104:201-8
22. Oka S, Chapman CR, Kim B, Nakajima I, Shimizu O, Oi Y. Pupil dilation response to noxious stimulation: effect of varying nitrous oxide concentration. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118:2016-24 (Pubitemid 47187753)