ChronoTape: Tangible timelines for family history

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, TEI 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 49-56

  Bennett, Peter ^a   Fraser, Mike ^a   Balaam, Madeline ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Genealogy; Inheritance; Personalisation; Temporal Tangible User Interfaces

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL COMPONENTS; DIGITAL MATERIALS; GENEALOGY; GRACEFUL DEGRADATION; INHERITANCE; ONLINE RECORDS; PERSONALISATION; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES; TANGIBLE INTERFACES; TANGIBLE USER INTERFACES;

HISTORY; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; USER INTERFACES;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84859059273     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2148131.2148144     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. R. Banks. The future of looking back. Microsoft Press, 2011.
2. P. Bennett. The Representation and Control of Time in Tangible User Interfaces. PhD thesis, Queen's University Belfast, 2010.
3. P. Bennett and S. O'Modhrain. The BeatBearing: a tangible rhythm sequencer. In Proc. of NordiCHI, 2008.
4. A. Cassinelli and M. Ishikawa. Khronos projector. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH Emerging technologies, 2005.
5. E. Costanza, S. Shelley, and J. Robinson. Introducing Audio d-touch: A tangible user interface for music composition and performance. In Proc. of DAFx, 2003.
6. T. Döring and S. Beckhaus. The card box at hand: exploring the potentials of a paper-based tangible interface for education and research in art history. In Proc. of TEI, 2007.
7. K. P. Fishkin. A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 8(5):347-358, 2004.
8. M. Fraser, A. Boddington, M. Dade-Robertson, R. Davies, G. Earl, M. Jones, and L. Moreau. PATINA: Personal architectonics of interactions with artefacts. In Proc. of Digital Futures, 2010.
9. Genetealogy. Motivations survey, May 2005. http://www.genetealogy.com/ survey 5 05.html.
10. D. Holman, R. Vertegaal, M. Altosaar, N. Troje, and D. Johns. Paper windows: interaction techniques for digital paper. In Proc. of CHI, 2005.
11. M. Kaltenbrunner and R. Bencina. reacTIVision: a computer-vision framework for table-based tangible interaction. In Proc. of TEI, 2007.
12. D. Kirk and A. Sellen. On human remains: Excavating the home archive. Technical Report MSR-TR-2008-8, Microsoft, 2008.
13. D. S. Kirk and R. Banks. On the design of technology heirlooms. In Proc. of SIMTech, 2008.
14. S. R. Klemmer, J. Graham, G. J. Wolff, and J. A. Landay. Books with voices: paper transcripts as a physical interface to oral histories. In Proc. of CHI, 2003.
15. W. E. Mackay and A. Fayard. Designing interactive paper: lessons from three augmented reality projects. In Proc. of IWAR'98, 1999.
16. M. Massimi and R. M. Baecker. A death in the family: Opportunities for designing technologies for the bereaved. In Proc. of CHI, 2010.
17. W. Odom, J. Pierce, E. Stolterman, and E. Blevis. Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design. In Proc. of CHI, 2009.
18. H. Schnadelbach, B. Koleva, M. Flintham, M. Fraser, S. Izadi, P. Chandler, M. Foster, S. Benford, and C. Greenhalgh. The Augerscope: A mixed reality interface for outdoors. In Proc. of CHI, 2001.
19. K. L. Schrier. Revolutionizing history education: Using augmented reality games to teach histories. Master's thesis, MIT, 2005.
20. A. Sellen and R. Harper. The Myth of the Paperless Office. MIT Press, 2002.
21. Society of Genealogists. Information leaflet no. 4. http://www.sog.org. uk/leaflets/notes.pdf, 1998.
22. B. A. Ullmer. Tangible Interfaces for Manipulating Aggregates of Digital Information. PhD thesis, School of Architecture and Planning, MIT, 2002.