Highly parallel translation of dna sequences into small molecules

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Weisinger, Rebecca M ^a   Wrenn, S Jarrett ^a,b   Harbury, Pehr B ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; CONJUGATION; DEVICES; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; GENETIC CODE; IN VITRO STUDY; MESOFLUIDIC DEVICE; GENE LIBRARY; GENETICS; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR LIBRARY; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; REPRODUCIBILITY;

DNA;

COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; DNA; GENE LIBRARY; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SMALL MOLECULE LIBRARIES;

EID: 84859048365     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028056     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Vaughan TJ, Williams AJ, Pritchard K, Osbourn JK, Pope AR, et al. (1996) Human antibodies with sub-nanomolar affinities isolated from a large non-immunized phage display library. Nature biotechnology 14: 309-314.
2. Wilson DS, Keefe AD, Szostak JW, (2001) The use of mRNA display to select high-affinity protein-binding peptides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 3750-3755.
3. Bock LC, Griffin LC, Latham JA, Vermaas EH, Toole JJ, (1992) Selection of single-stranded DNA molecules that bind and inhibit human thrombin. Nature 355: 564-566.
4. Burmeister PE, Lewis SD, Silva RF, Preiss JR, Horwitz LR, et al. (2005) Direct in vitro selection of a 2′-O-methyl aptamer to VEGF. Chemistry & biology 12: 25-33.
5. Tian Y, Adya N, Wagner S, Giam CZ, Green MR, et al. (1995) Dissecting protein:protein interactions between transcription factors with an RNA aptamer. RNA 1: 317-326.
6. Wrenn SJ, Harbury PB, (2007) Chemical evolution as a tool for molecular discovery. Annual review of biochemistry 76: 331-349.
7. Clark MA, (2010) Selecting chemicals: the emerging utility of DNA-encoded libraries. Current opinion in chemical biology 14: 396-403.
8. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ, (2001) Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Advanced drug delivery reviews 46: 3-26.
9. Wrenn SJ, Weisinger RM, Halpin DR, Harbury PB, (2007) Synthetic ligands discovered by in vitro selection. Journal of the American Chemical Society 129: 13137-13143.
10. Clark MA, Acharya RA, Arico-Muendel CC, Belyanskaya SL, Benjamin DR, et al. (2009) Design, synthesis and selection of DNA-encoded small-molecule libraries. Nature chemical biology 5: 647-654.
11. Kleiner RE, Dumelin CE, Tiu GC, Sakurai K, Liu DR, (2010) In vitro selection of a DNA-templated small-molecule library reveals a class of macrocyclic kinase inhibitors. Journal of the American Chemical Society 132: 11779-11791.
12. Mannocci L, Melkko S, Buller F, Molnar I, Bianke JP, et al. (2010) Isolation of potent and specific trypsin inhibitors from a DNA-encoded chemical library. Bioconjugate chemistry 21: 1836-1841.
13. Mills DR, Peterson RL, Spiegelman S, (1967) An extracellular Darwinian experiment with a self-duplicating nucleic acid molecule. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 58: 217-224.
14. Tuerk C, Gold L, (1990) Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. Science 249: 505-510.
15. Ellington AD, Szostak JW, (1990) In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands. Nature 346: 818-822.
16. Joyce GF, (1989) Amplification, mutation and selection of catalytic RNA. Gene 82: 83-87.
17. Scott JK, Smith GP, (1990) Searching for peptide ligands with an epitope library. Science 249: 386-390.
18. Carothers JM, Oestreich SC, Davis JH, Szostak JW, (2004) Informational complexity and functional activity of RNA structures. Journal of the American Chemical Society 126: 5130-5137.
19. Lancet D, Sadovsky E, Seidemann E, (1993) Probability model for molecular recognition in biological receptor repertoires: significance to the olfactory system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90: 3715-3719.
20. Valler MJ, Green D, (2000) Diversity screening versus focussed screening in drug discovery. Drug discovery today 5: 286-293.
21. Lipinski C, Hopkins A, (2004) Navigating chemical space for biology and medicine. Nature 432: 855-861.
22. Brenner S, Lerner RA, (1992) Encoded combinatorial chemistry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89: 5381-5383.
23. Weisinger RM, Marinelli RJ, Wrenn SJ, Harbury PB, (2012) Mesofluidic devices for DNA-programmed combinatorial chemistry.
24. Halpin DR, Harbury PB, (2004) DNA display I. Sequence-encoded routing of DNA populations. PLoS biology 2: E173.