The added-value approach in siting nuclear waste facilities

Radwaste Solutions

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 38-51

  Kojo, Matti ^a   Richardson, Phil ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COOPERATION AGREEMENT; FINLAND; NUCLEAR WASTE REPOSITORIES; POLITICAL CONSTRAINTS; POWER COMPANY; TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS;

ELECTRIC UTILITIES; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

RADIOACTIVE WASTES;

COOPERATIVE SECTOR; INCENTIVE; RADIOACTIVE WASTE; REPOSITORY; VOLUNTARY APPROACH; WASTE FACILITY; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

FINLAND; SWEDEN;

EID: 84859046607     PISSN: 15294900     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. A. Bergmans, M. Elam, D. Kos, M. Polic, P. Simmons, G. Sundqvist and J. Walls, "Wanting the Unwanted: Ef-fects of Public and Stakeholder In-volvement in the Long-Term Man-agement of Radioactive Waste and the Siting of Repository Facility," Fi-nal Report of the CARL project (2008).
2. G. Mackerron and F. Berkhout, "Learning to Listen: Institutional Change and Legitimation in U.K. Radioactive Waste Policy," J. Risk Research, 12, 7-8, 989 (2009).
3. J. Richardson, G. Gustafsson, and G. Jordan, "The Concept of Policy Style," Policy Styles in Western Eu-rope, p. 1, J. Richardson, Ed., George Allen &Unwin, London (1982).
4. O. Renn, Risk Governance. Cop-ing with Uncertainty in a Complex World, Earthscan, London (2008).
5. A. Blowers and G. Sunqvist, "Ra-dioactive Waste Management-Tech- nocratic Dominance in an Age of Participation," J. Integrative Envi-ronmental Sciences, 7,3, 149 (2010).
6. S. Saurugger, "The Social Con-struction of Participatory Turn: The Emergence of a Norm in the Euro-pean Union," European J. Political Research, 49,4, 471 (2010).
7. S. Tiihonen, From Governing to Governance. A Process of Change,Tampere University Press, Tampere (2008).
8. J. Chilvers and J. Burgess, "Power Relations: the Politics of Risk and Procedure in Nuclear Waste Gover-: nance," Environment and Planning A, 40,1881 (2008).
9. G. Sunqvist and M. Elam, "Public Involvement Designed to Circum-vent Public Concern? The 'Participa-tory Turn' in European Nuclear Ac-tivities," Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 1, 4, 203 (2010).
10. H. Strauss, "Involving the Finnish Public in Nuclear Facility Licensing: Participatory Democracy and Indus-trial Bias," J. Integrative Environ-mental Sciences, 7,3, 211 (2010).
11. B. S. Frey, F. Oberholzer-Gee, and R. Eichenberger, "The Old Lady Visits Your Backyard: A Tale of Morals and Markets," J. Political Economy, 104,6, 1297(1996).
12. M. Kojo and P. Richardson, The Role of Compensation in Nuclear Waste Facility Siting. A Literature Re-view and Real Life Examples, Arenas for Risk Governance (ARGONA), University of Tampere and Galson Sciences Ltd.; www.argonaproject.eu/ docs/argona-del16b-compensation. pdf(2009).
13. D. S. Zinberg, "Public Participa-tion: U.S. and European Perspec-tives," The Politics of Nuclear Waste, p. 160, E.W Colglazier Jr., Ed., Perg-amon Press, New York (1982).
14. B. Solomon and D. Cameron, "Nuclear Waste Repository Siting. An Alternative Approach," Energy Policy, 564 (December 1985).
15. L. J. Carter, Nuclear Imperatives and Public Trust. Dealing with Ra-dioactive Waste, Resources for the Future Inc., Washington, D.C. (1987).
16. G. Jacob, Site Unseen. The Poli-tics of Siting a Nuclear Waste Reposi-tory, University of Pittsburg Press, Pittsburgh (1990).
17. D. Easterling, "Fair Rules for Sit-ing a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository," J. Policy Analysis and Management, 11,3, 442 (1992).
18. E. B. Sigmon, "Achieving A Ne-gotiated Compensation Agreement in Siting: The MRS Case," J. of Policy Analysis and Management, 6, 2, 170(1987).
19. J. Flynn et al., One Hundred Centuries of Solitude. Redirecting America's High-Level Nuclear Waste Policy, Westview Press, Boulder, San Francisco, Oxford (1995).
20. D. Easterling and H. Kunreuther, The Dilemma of Siting a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/ Dordrecht/London (1995).
21. H. Jenkins-Smith and H. Kunreuther, "Mitigation and Benefits Measures as Policy Tools for Siting Potentially Hazardous Facilities: Determinants of Effectiveness and Appropriateness," Risk Analysis, 21, 2, 371 (2001).
22. Meeting report, 3KQ and DIALOGUEBYDESIGN, UK CARL Workshop, Energus Centre, Workington, Cumbria, U.K., October 2022,2009.
23. P. Richardson, "Brief 3: Community Benefits and Support Packages," Cowam in Practice (Contract Number: FP6-036455), Theme 1 Report D3; http://cowam.com/IMG/pdf D2-5 B -Community Support.pdf (2009).
24. A. Bergmans, "International Benchmarking of Community Benefits Related to Facilities for Radioactive Waste Management," Report commissioned by EDRAM, Nirond 2010-01 E, Ondraf/Niras (2010).
25. R. Kemp, The Politics of Radioactive Waste Disposal, Manchester University Press, Manchester (1992).
26. R. Gregory, H. Kunreuther, D. Easterling, and K. Richards, "Incentives Policies to Site Hazardous Waste Facilities," Risk Analysis, 11,4, 667(1991).
27. N. Chapman, C. McCombie, and P. Richardson, SAPIERR-2 Strategic Action Plan for Implementation of European Regional Repositories: Stage 2, Work Package 3, Economic Aspects of Regional Repositories (2008).
28. H. Kunreuther and D. Easterling, "The Role of Compensation in Siting Hazardous Facilities," Public Policy Analysis and Management, 15,4, 601 (1996).
29. S. A. Carnes, E. D. Copenhaver, J. H. Sorenson, E.J. Soderstrom, J. H. Reed, D. J. Bjornstad and E. Peele, "Incentives and Nuclear Waste Siting: Prospects and Constraints," Energy Systems and Policy, 7,4, 323 (1983).
30. "Fostering a Durable Relationship Between a Waste Management Facility and its Host Community; Adding Value Through Design and Process," NEA No. 6176, OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris (2007).
31. P. Richardson, "A Review of Benefits Offered to Volunteer Communities for Siting Nuclear Waste Facilities," (M 1996:C) Swedish National Co-ordinator for Nuclear Waste Disposal (1998).
32. E. Säynässalo, "Nuclear Energy Policy Processes in Finland in a Comparative Perspective: Complex Mechanisms of a Strong Administrative State," The Renewal of Nuclear Power in Finland, p. 126, M. Kojo and T. Litmanen, Eds., Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2009).
33. "Survey of National Programs for Managing High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel," A Report to Congress and the Secretary of Energy, U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (October 2009).
34. G. Sundqvist, The Bedrock of Opinion. Science, Technology and Society in the Siting of High-Level Nuclear Waste, " Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dortrecht (2002).
35. M. Kojo, "The Strategy of Site Selection for the Spent Nuclear Fuel Repository in Finland, The Renewal of Nuclear Power in Finland, p. 161, M. Kojo and T. Litmanen, Eds., Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2009).
36. R. Darst and J. Dawson, "Waiting for the Nuclear Renaissance: Exploring the Nexus of Expansion and Disposal in Europe," Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 1, 4, Article 3 (2010).
37. M. Kari, M. Kojo, and T Litmanen, "Community Divided. Adaptation and Aversion towards the Spent Nuclear Fuel Repository in Eurajoki and its Neighbouring Municipalities," University of Jyväskylä and University of Tampere (2010); http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39- 4149-9.
38. S. Engström, "The SKB Added Value Program," presented at Sweco Eurofutures Seminar, September 2009.
39. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, Vattenfall AB, E.ON Kärnkraft AB, Forsmark Kraftgrupp AB, OKG Aktiebolag, Oskarshamns Kommun, Östhammars Kommun, Samarbetsavtal angdende utvecklingsinsatser i Oskarshamns och Osthammars kommuner i anslutning till genomförandet av det svenska kärnavfalls-programmet," Bilaga 1: Mervärdeinsatser i Kommunerna, Bilaga 2: Principer för beräkning av mervärden (2009).
40. "Olkiluoto on nostanut Eurajoen kuntatalouden omaan luokkaansa," Satakunnan Kansa, (newspaper) (December 2,2009).