Respondent-driven sampling

Stata Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 72-93

  Schonlau, Matthias ^a   Liebau, Elisabeth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b DIW BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Rds; Rds network; Respondent driven sampling; St0247

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859040746     PISSN: 1536867X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1536867x1201200106     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abdul-Quader, A. S., D. D. Heckathorn, C. McKnight, H. Bramson, C. Nemeth, K. Sabin, K. Gallagher, and D. C. Des Jarlais. 2006. Effectiveness of respondentdriven sampling for recruiting drug users in New York City: Findings from a pilot study. Journal of Urban Health 83: 459-476.
2. Gile, K. J. 2011. Improved inference for respondent-driven sampling data with application to HIV prevalence estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 106: 135-146.
3. Goel, S., and M. J. Salganik. 2010. Assessing respondent-driven sampling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 6743-6747.
4. Heckathorn, D. D. 1997. Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems 44: 174-199.
5. Heckathorn, D. D. 2002. Respondent-driven sampling II: Deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems 49: 11-34.
6. Heckathorn, D. D. 2007. Extensions of respondent-driven sampling: Analyzing continuous variables and controlling for differential recruitment. Sociological Methodology 37: 151-207.
7. Heckathorn, D. D., S. Semaan, R. S. Broadhead, and J. J. Hughes. 2002. Extensions of respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of injection drug users aged 18-25. AIDS and Behavior 6: 55-67.
8. Iguchi, M. Y., A. J. Ober, S. H. Berry, T. Fain, D. D. Heckathorn, P. M. Gorbach, R. Heimer, A. Kozlov, L. J. Ouellet, S. Shoptaw, and W. A. Zule. 2009. Simultaneous recruitment of drug users and men who have sex with men in the United States and Russia using respondent-driven sampling: Sampling methods and implications. Journal of Urban Health 86 (Suppl. 1): 5-31.
9. Johnston, L., H. O'Bra, M. Chopra, C. Mathews, L. Townsend, K. Sabin, M. Tomlinson, and C. Kendall. 2010. The associations of voluntary counseling and testing acceptance and the perceived likelihood of being HIV-infected among men with multiple sex partners in a South African township. AIDS and Behavior 14: 922-931.
10. Johnston, L. G. 2008. Behavioural surveillance: Introduction to respondent driven sampling Participant manual, Global AIDS Program (GAP) Surveillance Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://globalhealthsciences.ucsf.edu/sites/default/files/content/pphg/surveillance/modules/global-trainings/respondent-driven-sampling-2008.pdf.
11. Johnston, L. G., M. Malekinejad, C. Kendall, I. M. Iuppa, and G. W. Rutherford. 2008. Implementation challenges to using respondent-driven sampling methodology for HIV biological and behavioral surveillance: Field experiences in international settings. AIDS and Behavior 12 (Suppl. 1): 131-141.
12. Malekinejad, M., L. G. Johnston, C. Kendall, L. R. Kerr, M. R. Rifkin, and G. W. Rutherford. 2008. Using respondent-driven sampling methodology for HIV biological and behavioral surveillance in international settings: A systematic review. AIDS and Behavior 12 (Suppl. 1): 105-130.
13. RDS. 2006. RDS Analysis Tool 5.6 User Manual. Ithaca, NY: RDS.
14. Rothbart, G. S., M. Fine, and S. Sudman. 1982. On finding and interviewing the needles in the haystack: The use of multiplicity sampling. Public Opinion Quarterly 46: 408-421.
15. Salganik, M. J. 2006. Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling. Journal of Urban Health 83 (Suppl. 1): 98-112.
16. Salganik, M. J., and D. D. Heckathorn. 2004. Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology 34: 193-239.
17. Volz, E., and D. D. Heckathorn. 2008. Probability based estimation theory for respondent driven sampling. Journal of Official Statistics 24: 79-97.
18. Volz, E., C. Wejnert, I. Degani, and D. D. Heckathorn. 2010. Respondent-Driven Sampling Analysis Tool (RDSAT) Version 6.0 Beta. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
19. Wejnert, C. 2009. An empirical test of respondent-driven sampling: Point estimates, variance, degree measures, and out-of-equilibrium data. Sociological Methodology 39: 73-116.
20. Wejnert, C., and D. D. Heckathorn. 2008. Web-based network sampling: Efficiency and efficacy of respondent-driven sampling for online research. Sociological Methods and Research 37: 105-134.