Prediction of communication structures based on product structures

Invest on Visualization - Proceedings of the 13th International DSM Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 291-300

  Biedermann, Wieland ^a   Lindemann, Udo ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Communication structure; Product structure; Structural comparison

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE WORK; COMMUNICATION STRUCTURES; COST AND SCHEDULE; MARKET PRESSURE; PROCESS COMPLEXITY; PRODUCT STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL COMPARISON; STRUCTURE-BASED;

VISUALIZATION;

COMMUNICATION;

EID: 84859032709     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Baldwin, C.Y., & Clark, K.B. (2000) Design Rules, Vol. 1: The Power of Modularity. MIT Press.
2. Browning, T.R. (2001). Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering management, 48, 292-306. (Pubitemid 32933089)
3. Conway, M.E. (1968). How Do Committees Invent? Datamation, 14, 28-31.
4. de Weck, O.L. (2007). On the Role of DSM in Designing Systems and Products for Changeability. In Proceedings of the 9th International DSM Conference, Munich, October 2007 (pp. 311-324), Munich: Shaker.
5. Kreimeyer, M. (2010). A Structural Measurement System for Engineering Design Processes. Munich: Dr-Hut.
6. Langer, U., Knoblinger, C., & Lindemann, U. (2010). Analysis of Dynamic Changes and Iterations in the Development Process of an Electrically Powered Go-Kart. In: Proceedings of 11th International Design Conference DESIGN 2010, Dubrovnik, May 2010 (pp. 307-318), Dubrovnik: Design Society.
7. Lindemann, U., Maurer, M., & Braun, T. (2009). Structural Complexity Management - An Approach for the Field of Product Development. Berlin: Springer.