Battle Experiments of Naval Air Defense with Discrete Event System-based Mission-level Modeling and Simulations

Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 173-187

  Kim, Jeong Hoon ^a   Choi, Chang Beom ^a   Kim, Tag Gon ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

battle experiment; command and control; discrete event system; mission level; modeling and simulation

Indexed keywords

AEGIS SYSTEMS; COMMAND AND CONTROL; CRITICAL PARAMETER; CRITICAL TASKS; DISCRETE EVENTS; ENGAGEMENT LEVELS; MILITARY DOMAINS; MISSION EXECUTION; MISSION LEVEL; MODELING AND SIMULATION; NAVAL AIR DEFENSE; PAPER MODELS; VARYING PARAMETERS; WEAPON SYSTEM;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION; DISPENSERS; EXPERIMENTS; FLEET OPERATIONS; WARSHIPS;

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 84858980138     PISSN: 15485129     EISSN: 1557380X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1548512911401446     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Piplani LK, Mercer JG and Roop RO Systems acquisition manager's guide for the use of models and simulations. Report of the DSMC 1993-1994. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Systems Management College, 1994.
2. Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (US). Acquisition modeling and simulation master plan. Systems Engineering Forum, April 2006.
3. Shufelt JW A vision for future virtual training. In: RTO Human Factors and Medicine Panel Workshop, West Point, NY, June 2006, pp.KN2-1-KN2-12.
4. Cramer MA, Beach JE, Mazzuchi TA and Sarkani S. Understanding information uncertainty within the context of a net-centric data model: a mine warfare example. Int C2 J 2009; 3: 1-55.
5. Manclark J. Air Force test and evaluation presentation. U.S. Air Force T&E Days. Albuquerque, NM, February 2009.
6. Harrison N., Gilbert B., Lauzon M., Jeffrey A., Lalancette C., Lestage R.,et al.A M&S process to achieve reusability and interoperability. In: Proceedings of the RTO NMSG Conference, Paris, October2002.
7. McGraw RM and MacDonald RA Abstract modeling for engineering and engagement level simulations. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, Orlando, FL, 2000, pp.326-334.
8. Zeigler BP, Praehofer H. and Kim TG Theory of modeling and simulation. 2nd ed. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 2000.
9. Committee on Technology for Future Naval Forces, National Research Council. Creating and improving intellectual and technological infrastructure for M&S. Technology for the United States Navy Corps, 2000-2035: becoming a 21st-century force: volume 9: modeling and simulation. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. USA 1997, Chapter 6, pp.70-90.
10. Department of the Navy (US). Naval command and control. Naval doctrine publication 6. Norfolk, VA: Naval Doctrine Command, 1995.
11. Carley KM and Lin Z. Organizational designs suited to high performance under stress. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1995; 25: 221-230.
12. Liebhaber MJ and Smith CAP. Naval air defense threat assessment: cognitive factors and model. In: Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Monterey, CA: June 2000.
13. Calfee SH Autonomous agent-based simulation of an AEGIS cruiser combat information center performing battle group air-defense commander operations Master's thesis. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School, 2003.
14. Lalis V. Exploring naval tactics with UAVs in an island complex using agent-based simulation. Master's thesis. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School, 2007.
15. Ercetin A. Operational-level naval planning using agent-based simulation. Master's thesis. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School, 2001.
16. Moulin M. and Briancon PD Force protection: the protection of French navy warships. DOCTRINE November 15, November 2008, pp.46-49.
17. Maiorano AG, Carr NP and Bender TJ A primer on naval theater air defense. Joint Forces Quarterly, Spring, 1996: 23-28.
18. Young N. and Stacey BA Naval air defence: softkill, hardkill, and platform signature coordination. J Battlefield Technol 2007; 10: 9-12.
19. Montgomery DC, Peck EA and Vinning GG Introduction to linear regression analysis. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley, 2001.
20. Zeigler BP DEVS Representation of dynamical systems: event-based intelligent control. Proc IEEE 1989; 77: 72-80.
21. Michael JA and Richard FD Modeling the Lanchester laws with system dynamics. J Defense Model Simulat 2008; 5: 1-20.
22. Lucas T., Sanchez S., Brown L. and Vinyard W. Better designs for high-dimensional explorations of distillations. In: Maneuver Warfare Science 2002, United States Marine Corps Project Albert, Quantico, VA, 2002.