Infected total hip arthroplasty revision: One- or two-stage procedure?

Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 144-150

  Klouche, S ^a   Leonard, P ^a   Zeller, V ^a   Lhotellier, L ^a   Graff, W ^a   Leclerc, P ^a   Mamoudy, P ^a   Sariali, E ^b  

^a Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon Teaching Hospital   (France)

^b PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Infection; Revision; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CITROBACTER KOSERI; CLINICAL TRIAL; DECISION TREE; DRUG EFFICACY; ERADICATION THERAPY; FOLLOW UP; GERM CELL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NONHUMAN; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPIONIBACTERIUM ACNES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; REINFECTION; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS LUGDUNENSIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INJECTIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84858978661     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18770568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.08.018     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bozic K., Ries M.D. The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2005, 87:1746-1751.
2. Klouche S., Sariali E., Mamoudy P. Total hip arthroplasty revision due to infection: a cost analysis approach. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010, 96:124-132.
3. Lidwell O.M. Clean air at operation and subsequent sepsis in the joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986, 211:91-102.
4. Lecuire F., Gontier D., Carrere J., Giordano N., Rubini J., Basso M. Ten-year surveillance of nosocomial surgical site infections in an orthopaedic surgery department. Rev Chir Orthop 2003, 89:479-486.
5. Toms A., Davidson D., Masri, Duncan C.P. The management of peri-prosthetic infection in total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006, 88:149-155.
6. Puolakka T.J., Pajamaki K.J., Halonen P.J., et al. The Finnish Arthroplasty Register: report of the hip register. Acta Orthop Scand 2001, 72:433-441.
7. Lucht U. The Danish Hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000, 71:433-439.
8. Bozic K., Katz P., Cisternas M., Ono L., Ries M.D., Showstack J. Hospital resource utilization for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2005, 87:570-576.
9. Jafari S.M., Coyle C., Mortazavi J., Sharkey P.F., Parvizi J. Revision hip arthroplasty: infection is the most cause of failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:2046-2051.
10. Tsukayama D., Estrada R., Gustilo R. Infection after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the teatment of one hundred and six infections. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1996, 78:512-523.
11. Vielpeau C., Lortat-Jacob A. Les reprises de prothèses totales de hanche infectées. Rev Chir Orthop 2002, 88Suppl:S161-S208.
12. Elson R. Exchange arthroplasty for infection. Perspectives from the United Kingdom. Orthop Clin North Am 1993, 24:761-767.
13. Garvin K., Fitzgerald R.H., Salvati, Brause B.D., Nercessian O.A., Wallrichs S.L., et al. Reconstruction of the infected total hip and knee arthroplasty with gentamycin-impregnated Palacos bone cement. Instr Course Lect 1993, 42:293-302.
14. Colyer R.A., Capello W.N. Surgical treatment of the infected hip implant: two-stage reimplantation with a one-month interval. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 298:75-79.
15. Ure K.J., Amstutz H., Nasser S., Schmalzried T.P. Direct-exchange arthroplasty fort he treatment of infection after total hip replacement. An average ten year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1998, 80:961-968.
16. Callaghan J.J., Katz R.P., Johnston R.C. One-stage revision surgery of the infected hip: a minimum 10-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999, 369:139-143.
17. Jackson W.O., Schmalzried T.P. Limited role of direct exchange arthroplasty in the treatment of infected total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000, 381:101-105.
18. Raut W., Siney P.D., Wroblewski B.M. One-stage revision of infected total hip replacements with discharging sinuses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994, 76:721-724.
19. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System. http://www.asahq.org/clinical/physicalstatus.htm.
20. Paprosky W.G., Perona P.G., Lawrence J.M. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1994, 9:33-44.
21. Paprosky W.G., Bradford M.S., Younger T.I. Classification of bone defects in failed prostheses. Chir Organi Mov 1994, 79:285-291.
22. Merle d'Aubigné R. Numerical classification of the function of the hip. Rev Chir Orthop 1970, 56:481-486.
23. Lortat-Jacob A., Desplaces N., Gaudias J., et al. Infection secondaire de prothèse articulaire: critères du diagnostic, traitement et prévention. Rev Chir Orthop 2002, 88:51-61.
24. Schmalzried T.P. The infected hip: telltale signs and treatment options. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21(4 Suppl. 1):97-100.
25. Surin V.V., Sundholm K., Backman L. Infection after total hip replacement. With special reference to a discharge from the wound. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1983, 65:412-418.
26. Cabrita H.B., Croci A.T., Camargo O.P., Lima A.L. Prospective study of the treatment of infected hip arthroplasties with or without the use of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer. Clinics 2007, 62:99-108.
27. Banit D.M., Kaufer H., Hartford J.M. Intraoperative frozen section analysis in revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 401:230-238.