An uneven spread: A review of public involvement in the National Institute of Health Research's Health Technology Assessment program

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 343-347

  Moran, Rebecca ^a   Davidson, Peter ^b  

^a ROYAL CORNWALL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consumers; HTA; NIHR; Patient and public involvement; Research management

Indexed keywords

CONSUMERS; HTA; NIHR; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; RESEARCH MANAGEMENT;

PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH;

PUBLIC HEALTH;

ARTICLE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLICATION; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TECHNOLOGY; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMANS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 84858965961     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462311000559     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Boote J, Baird W, Beecroft C. Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: A narrative review of case examples. Health Policy. 2010;95:10-23.
2. Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: A review and research agenda. Health Policy. 2002;61:213-236. (Pubitemid 34669916)
3. Department of Health. Best research for best health: A new national health research strategy. London: Department of Health; 2006.
4. Hanley B, Bradburn J, Barnes M, et al. Involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research: Briefing notes for researchers. INVOLVE 2004.
5. Hanney S, Kuruvilla S, Soper B, Mays N. Who needs what from a national health research system: Lessons from reforms to the English Department of Health's R&D system. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8:11.
6. Mitton C, Smith N, Peacock S, et al. Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review. Health Policy. 2009;91:219-228.
7. National Institute of Health Research. www.nihr.ac.uk (accessed November 11, 2010) .
8. O'Donnell M, Entwistle V. Consumer involvement in research projects: The activities of research funders. Health Policy. 2004;69:229-238. (Pubitemid 38798445)
9. Oliver S, Milne R, Bradburn J, et al. Involving consumers in a needs-led research programme: A pilot project. Health Expect. 2001;4:18-28. (Pubitemid 32230114)
10. Oliver S, Armes DG, Gyte G. Public involvement in setting a national research agenda: A mixedmethods evaluation. Patient. 2009;2:179-190.
11. Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R, et al. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: Developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:1-148.
12. Royle J, Oliver S. Consumer involvement in the health technology assessment program. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:493-497. (Pubitemid 39491499)
13. Saunders C, Girgis A. Status, challenges and facilitators of consumer involvement in Australian health and medical research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8:34.
14. Staley K. Exploring impact: Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. INVOLVE; 2009.
15. Staniszewska S, Herron-Marx S, Mockford C. Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement: The need for an evidence base. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008;20:373-374.
16. Stevens A, Milne R. Health technology assessment in England andWales. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:11-24. (Pubitemid 38656957)
17. Telford R, Boote J, Cooper C. What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expect. 2004;7:209-220. (Pubitemid 39166370)
18. Thompson J, Barber R, Ward PR, et al. Health researchers'attitudes towards public involvement in health research. Health Expect. 2009;12:209-220.