The TUNA-REG challenge 2009: Overview and evaluation results

Proceedings of the 12th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, ENLG 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 174-182

  Gatt, Albert ^a   Belz, Anja ^b   Kow, Eric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION METHOD; EVALUATION RESULTS; HUMAN TASKS;

EID: 84858953230     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. A. Belz and A. Gatt. 2007. The attribute selection for gre challenge: Overview and evaluation results. InProceedings of UCNLG+MT: Language Generation and Machine Translation.
2. A. Belz and A. Gatt. 2008. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic evaluation measures for referring expression generation. In Proceedings of the 46th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'08), pages 197-200.
3. A. Black, P. Taylor, and R. Caley, 1999. The Festival Speech Synthesis System: System Documentation. University of Edinburgh, 1.4 edition.
4. K. I. Forster and J. C. Forster. 2003. DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1):116-124. (Pubitemid 37545055)
5. A. Gatt, A. Belz, and Eric Kow. 2008. The tuna challenge 2008: Overview and evaluation results. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Natural Language Generation (INLG'08).
6. K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T.Ward, andW.-J. Zhu. 2001. BLEU: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. IBM research report, IBM Research Division.
7. S. Papineni, T. Roukos, W. Ward, and W. Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a. method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proc. 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-02), pages 311-318.
8. R. Ratliff. 1993. Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3):510- 532.