Argument/Valency structure in prop bank, LCS database and Prague dependency treebank: A comparative pilot study

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 846-851

  Hajicòvá, Eva ^a   Kucèrová, Ivona ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY;

PILOT STUDIES; PRAGUE DEPENDENCY TREEBANK;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84858871771     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Dorr, B.J. (2001). LCS Verb Database, O!ine Software Database of Lexcal Conceptual Structures and Documentation, UMCP. http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~bonnie/LCS-Database-Documentation, html.
2. Dor, B.J. & Olsen, B.M. (1997). Aspectual Modifications to a LCS Database for NLP Applications. Techmcal Report LAMP-TR-007, UMIACS-TR-97-21, CS-TR- 3763, Unvers^ty of Maryland, College Park. http://lamp.cfa.umd.edui/MediaiPublications/Papers/LAMP-007iLAMP-007.pdf.
3. Hajic, J. (1998). Building a Syntacticlly Annotated Corpus: The Prague Dependency Treebank. In E. Hajicova (Ed.): Issues of Valency and Meaning. Studies in Honor of Jarmila Panevova (pp. 106-133). Prague: Kaolinum, Charles Unversity Press.
4. Hajic, J. et al. (2001). The Prague Dependency Treebank. CDROM. Linguistic Data Consortium, Urnv. of Pennsylvania, PA. Cat. CLDC2001T10. ISBN 1- 58563-212-0.
5. Hajicova, E. et al. (2000). A Manual for Tectogrammatic Taggng of the Prague Dependency Treebank. UFAL/CKL Technical Repor TR-2000-09, Czech Republic: Charles Unversety.
6. LCS (2001).http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~bonnie/LCS-Database-Documentation.html.
7. Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Prelimnary Investigation. Clhcago and London: The Unversity of Chcago Press.
8. NEGRA (2002). http://www.colbuni-sb.de/sfb378/negra-corpus/.
9. Palmer, M., Rosenzweig, J. & Cotton, S. (2001): Automatic Predicate Argument Anaysss of the Penn Tree Bank. In J. Alan (Ed.): Proceedings of HLT 2001, First International Conference on Human Language Technology Research. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufamm. http//hlt2001.org/papers/hit20011-10.pdf.
10. Panevova, J. (1994). Valency Frames and the Meanng of the Sentence. In Ph.L. Luelsdorff (Ed.): The Prague School of Structural and Functional Linguistics (pp. 223-243). Lingmstic and Literary Studies in Eastern Europe 41, Amsterdam-Philadelphia: JohnBenjamns.
11. Sgall P., Hajicova E. & Panevova J. (1986). The Meanng of the Sentence in IIs Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel, Prague: Academia.
12. Stianakova-Lopatkova, M. & Zabokrsky, Z. (2002). Valency Dictionary of Czech Verbs: Complex Tectogrammatical Annotation. Proceedings of Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Las Pamas, Span.
13. Tesniere, L. (1959). Elements de syntaxe structurale. Pars.