A systematic approach of design theories using generativeness and robustness

ICED 11 - 18th International Conference on Engineering Design - Impacting Society Through Engineering Design

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 87-97

  Hatchuel, Armand ^a   Le Masson, Pascal ^a   Reich, Yoram ^b   Weil, Benoit ^a  

^a PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Comparative methodology; Design theory; Generativeness; Robustness

Indexed keywords

AXIOMATIC DESIGN; BODY OF KNOWLEDGE; COMPARATIVE METHODOLOGY; DESIGN PROCESS; DESIGN PROPOSAL; DESIGN SCIENCE; DESIGN STANDARD; DESIGN THEORY; FORMAL DESIGN; GENERATIVENESS; GENERATIVITY;

ENGINEERING; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84858858536     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Yoshikawa, H., Design philosophy: the state of the art. Annals of the CIRP, 1989, 38(2):579-586.
2. Finger, S. and Dixon, J.R., A Review of Research in Mechanical Engineering Design. Research in Engineering Design, 1989, 1, pp51-67 (part I) and 121-137 (Part II).
3. Braha, D. and Reich, Y., Topologial structures for modelling engineering design processes. Research in Engineering Design, 2003, 14(4), pp185-199.
4. Hatchuel, A. and Weil, B., C-K design theory: an advanced formulation. Research in Engineering Design, 2009, 19, pp181-192.
5. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W., Konstruktionslehre (English title: engineering design). (Springer Verlag, English edition: The Design Council, Heidelberg, English edition: London, 1977).
6. Rogers, P.C., Hsueh, S.-L. and Gibbons, A.S., The Generative Aspect of Design Theory. 5th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2005, pp3.
7. Jugulum, R. and Frey, D.D., Toward a taxonomy of concept designs for improved robustness. Journal of Engineering Design, 2007, 18(2), pp139-156.
8. Taguchi, G., System of Experimental Design: Engineering Methods to Optimize Quality and Minimize Cost. (American Supply Institute, 1987).
9. Tsui, K.-L., An Overview of Taguchi Method and newly developed statistical methods for robust design. IIE Transactions, 1992, 24(5), pp44-57.
10. Zeng, Y. and Gu, P., A science-based approach to product design theory: Part 1: formulation and formalization of design process. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 1999, 15, pp331-339.
11. Zeng, Y. and Gu, P., A science-based approach to product design theory: Part 2: formulation of design requirements and products. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 1999, 15, pp341-352.
12. Hansen, F., Konstruktionssytematik, eine Arbeitsweise für fortschrittliche Konstrukteure. (VEB Verlag Technik, Berlin, 1955).
13. Anschütz, F., Fritsch, M., Höhne, G., Langbein, P., Mehlberg, H. and Otte, V., Beiträge zum konstruktiven Entwicklungsprozess. Ilmenau, 1969).
14. Simon, H.A., ed. Models of Thought. (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1979).
15. Reich, Y., A Critical Review of General Design Theory. Research in Engineering Design, 1995, 7, pp1-18.
16. Takeda, H., Veerkamp, P., Tomiyama, T. and Yoshikawa, H., Modeling Design Processes. AI Magazine, 1990, Winter 1990, pp37-48.
17. Tomiyama, T. and Yoshikawa, H., Extended general design theory. pp32 (Centre for mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1986).
18. Yoshikawa, H., General Design Theory and a CAD System. In Sata and Warman, eds. Man-Machine Communication in CAD/CAM, proceedings of the IFIP WG5.2-5.3 Working Conference 1980 (Tokyo), pp35-57Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1981).
19. Suh, N.P., Principles of Design. (Oxford University Press, New York, 1990).
20. Suh, N.P., Applications of Axiomatic Design. In Integration of Process Knowledge into Design Support Systems, 1999 CIRP Design Seminar, 1. University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 24-26 March 1999. pp1-46 (Kluwer Academic Publishers)
21. Suh, N.P., A Theory of Complexity, Periodicity and the Design Axioms. Research in Engineering Design, 1999, 11, pp116-131.
22. Shai, O. and Reich, Y., Infused Design: I Theory. Research in Engineering Design, 2004, 15(2), pp93-107.
23. Shai, O. and Reich, Y., Infused Design: II Practice. Research in Engineering Design, 2004, 15(2), pp108-121.
24. Shai, O., Reich, Y. and Rubin, D., Creative Conceptual Design: Extending the Scope by Infused Design. Computer-Aided Design, 2009, 41(3), pp117-135.
25. Hatchuel, A. and Weil, B., A new approach of innovative design: an introduction to C-K theory. In ICED'03, August 2003. Stockholm, Sweden. pp14
26. Hatchuel, A. and Weil, B., Design as Forcing: deepening the foundations of C-K theory. In International Conference on Engineering Design. Paris. pp12
27. Kazakçi, A. and Hatchuel, A., Is "creative subject" of Brouwer a designer? - an Analysis of Intuitionistic Mathematics from the Viewpoint of C-K Design Theory?. In International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED'09. Stanford CA, 24-27 August 2009.
28. Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P. and Weil, B., Teaching Innovative Design Reasoning: How C-K Theory Can Help to Overcome Fixation Effect. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 2011, 25(1), pp77-92.
29. Hatchuel, A., Towards Design Theory and expandable rationality: the unfinished program of Herbert Simon. Journal of Management and Governance, 2002, 5(3-4), pp260-273.
30. Le Masson, P. and Weil, B., Aux sources de la R&D: genèse des théories de la conception réglée en Allemagne (1840-1960). Entreprises et histoire, 2010, 2010(1), pp11-50.
31. Le Masson, P., Weil, B. and Hatchuel, A., Strategic Management of Design and Innovation. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).
32. Reich, Y., Shai, O., Subrahmanian, E., Hatchuel, A. and Le Masson, P., The interplay between design and mathematics: introduction and bootstrapping effects. In 9th International Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis. Haifa, Israel. pp5
33. Boden, M.A., The creative mind. Myths and Mechanisms. (George Weidenfeld and Nicolson Ltd, 1990).
34. Gero, J.S., Creativity, emergence and evolution in design: concepts and framework. Knowledge-Based Systems, 1996, 9(7), pp435-448. (Pubitemid 126371186)
35. Nagai, Y., Taura, T. and Mukai, F., Concept Blending and Dissimilarity. Factors for Creative Design Process - A Comparison between the Linguistic Interpretation Process and Design Process. In Design Research Society Biennial Conference. Sheffield, UK, 16-19 July 2008.